Engineering adaptive user interfaces for enterprise applications

ABSTRACT

The user interface (UI) layer is considered an important component in software applications since it links the users to the software's functionality. Enterprise applications such as enterprise resource planning and customer relationship management systems have very complex UIs that are used by users with diverse needs in terms of the required features and layout preferences. The inability to cater for the variety of user needs diminishes the usability of these applications. One way to cater for those needs is through adaptive UIs. Some enterprise software providers offer mechanisms for tailoring UIs based on the variable user needs, yet those are not generic enough to be used with other applications and require maintaining multiple UI copies manually. A generic platform based on a model-driven approach could be more reusable since operating on the model level makes it technology independent. The main objective of this research is devising a generic, scalable, and extensible platform for building adaptive enterprise application UIs based on a runtime model-driven approach. This platform primarily targets UI simplification, which we defined as a mechanism for increasing usability through adaptive behavior by providing users with a minimal feature-set and an optimal layout based on the context-of-use. This paper provides an overview of the research questions and methodology, the results that were achieved so far, and the remaining work.

References

1. Akiki, P. A., Bandara, A. K., and Yu, Y. Using Interpreted Runtime Models for Devising Adaptive User Interfaces of Enterprise Applications. ICEIS'12, SciTePress (2012), 72--77.
2. Akiki, P. A., Bandara, A. K., and Yu, Y. RBUIS: Simplifying Enterprise Application User Interfaces through Engineering Role-Based Adaptive Behavior. EICS'13, ACM (2013), Forthcoming.
3. Akiki, P. A., Bandara, A. K., and Yu, Y. Crowdsourcing User Interface Adaptations for Minimizing the Bloat in Enterprise Applications. EICS'13, ACM (2013), Forthcoming.
4. Akiki, P. A., Bandara, A. K., and Yu, Y. Cedar Studio: An IDE Supporting Adaptive Model-Driven User Interfaces for Enterprise Applications. EICS'13, ACM (2013), Forthcoming.
5. Bacha, F., Oliveira, K., and Abed, M. A Model Driven Architecture Approach for User Interface Generation Focused on Content Personalization. RCIS'11, IEEE (2011), 1--6.
6. Benyon, D. Adaptive systems: a solution to usability problems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 3, 1 Springer (1993), 65--87.
7. Blumendorf, M., Lehmann, G., and Albayrak, S. Bridging Models and Systems at Runtime to Build Adaptive User Interfaces. EICS'10, ACM (2010), 9--18.
8. Calvary, G., Coutaz, J., Dâassi, O., Balme, L., and Demeure, A. Towards a New Generation of Widgets for Supporting Software Plasticity: The "Comet". Eng. HCI and Interactive Systems. Springer (2005), 306--324.
9. Calvary, G., Coutaz, J., Thevenin, D., Limbourg, Q., Bouillon, L., and Vanderdonckt, J. A Unifying Reference Framework for Multi-Target User Interfaces. Interacting with Computers 15, 3, Elsevier (2003), 289--308.
10. Carroll, J. M. and Carrithers, C. Training Wheels in a User Interface. CACM 27, 8, ACM (1984), 800--806.
11. Easterbrook, S., Singer, J., Storey, M.-A., and Damian, D. Selecting Empirical Methods for Software Engineering Research. Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering, Springer (2008), 285--311.
12. Ferraiolo, D. F., Sandhu, R., Gavrila, S., Kuhn, D. R., and Chandramouli, R. Proposed NIST Standard for RoleBased Access Control. TISSEC, ACM (2001), 224--274.
13. Florins, M. and Vanderdonckt, J. Graceful Degradation of User Interfaces as a Design Method for Multiplatform Systems. IUI'04, ACM (2004), 140--147.
14. Gajos, K. Z., Weld, D. S., and Wobbrock, J. O. Automatically Generating Personalized User Interfaces with Supple. Artificial Intelligence, Elsevier (2010), 910--950.
15. Kramer, J. and Magee, J. Self-Managed Systems: an Architectural Challenge.FOSE'07, IEEE (2007), 259--268.
16. Lepreux, S., Vanderdonckt, J., and Michotte, B. Visual Design of User Interfaces by (De)Composition. DSVIS'07, Springer-Verlag (2007), 157--170.
17. Lykkegaard, B. and Elbak, A. IDC - Document at a Glance - LC52T. International Data Corporation (2011).
18. McGrenere, J., Baecker, R. M., and Booth, K. S. An Evaluation of a Multiple Interface Design Solution for Bloated Software. CHI'02, ACM (2002), 164--170.
19. Paterno, F. Model-based Design and Evaluation of Interactive Applications. Springer-Verlag (1999).
20. Reinecke, K. and Bernstein, A. Improving Performance, Perceived Usability, and Aesthetics with Culturally Adaptive User Interfaces. TOCHI 18, ACM (2011), 1--29.
21. Shneiderman, B. Promoting Universal Usability with Multi-Layer Interface Design. CUU'03, ACM (2003), 1--8.
22. Singh, A. and Wesson, J. Evaluation Criteria for Assessing the Usability of ERP Systems. SAICSIT '09, ACM (2009), 87--95.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

• Software and its engineering

  • Software creation and management

    • Designing software

      • Software implementation planning

        • Software design techniques

    • Software development process management

  • Software organization and properties

    • Software system structures

      • Software architectures