System-level calibration for data fusion in wireless sensor networks

Abstract

Wireless sensor networks are typically composed of low-cost sensors that are deeply integrated in physical environments. As a result, the sensing performance of a wireless sensor network is inevitably undermined by biases in imperfect sensor hardware and the noises in data measurements. Although a variety of calibration methods have been proposed to address these issues, they often adopt the device-level approach that becomes intractable for moderate-to large-scale networks. In this article, we propose a two-tier system-level calibration approach for a class of sensor networks that employ data fusion to improve the sensing performance. In the first tier of our calibration approach, each sensor learns its local sensing model from noisy measurements using an online algorithm and only transmits a few model parameters. In the second tier, sensors' local sensing models are then calibrated to a common system sensing model. Our approach fairly distributes computation overhead among sensors and significantly reduces the communication overhead of calibration compared with the device-level approach. Based on this approach, we develop an optimal model calibration scheme that maximizes the target detection probability of a sensor network under bounded false alarm rate. Our approach is evaluated by both experiments on a testbed of TelosB motes and extensive simulations based on synthetic datasets as well as data traces collected in a real vehicle detection experiment. The results demonstrate that our system-level calibration approach can significantly boost the detection performance of sensor networks in scenarios with low signal-to-noise ratios.

References

1. Andersen, R. 2007. Modern Methods for Robust Regression. Sage Publications.
2. Astrom, K. and Wittenmark, B. 1994. Adaptive Control. Addison-Wesley.
3. Balzano, L. and Nowak, R. 2007. Blind calibration of sensor networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN'07). 79--88.
4. Bychkovskiy, V., Megerian, S., Estrin, D., and Potkonjak, M. 2003. A collaborative approach to in-place sensor calibration. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN'03). 301--316.
5. Clouqueur, T., Saluja, K. K., and Ramanathan, P. 2004. Fault tolerance in collaborative sensor networks for target detection. IEEE Trans. Comput. 53, 3, 320--333.
6. Crossbow. 2013. Mica and mica2 wireless measurement system datasheets. http://gyro.xbow.com/Products/Product_pdf_files/Datasheets/Wireless/6020-0041-01_A_MICA.pdf.
7. Duarte, M. and Hu, Y.-H. 2004. Vehicle classification in distributed sensor networks. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 64, 7, 826--838.
8. Fabeck, G. and Mathar, R. 2007. In-situ calibration of sensor networks for distributed detection applications. In Proceedings of the 3^rd International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing (ISSNIP'07).
9. Feng, J., Megerian, S., and Potkonjak, M. 2003. Model-based calibration for sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2^nd IEEE International Conference on Sensors (Sensors'03). 737--742.
10. Fuwa, K. and Valle, B. 1963. The physical basis of analytical atomic absorption spectrometry. The pertinence of the beer-lambert law. Anal. Chem. 35, 8, 942--946.
11. Gu, L., Jia, D., Vicaire, P., Yan, T., Luo, L., Tirumala, A., Cao, Q., He, T., Stankovic, J. A., Abdelzaher, T., and Krogh, B. H. 2005. Lightweight detection and classification for wireless sensor networks in realistic environments. In Proceedings of the 3^rd ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys'05). 205--217.
12. Hata, M. 1980. Empirical formula for propagation loss in land mobile radio services. IEEE Trans. Vehic. Technol. 29, 3, 317--325.
13. He, T., Krishnamurthy, S., Stankovic, J. A., Abdelzaher, T., Luo, L., Stoleru, R., Yan, T., Gu, L., Hui, J., and Krogh, B. 2004. Energy-efficient surveillance system using wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2^nd International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys'04). 270--283.
14. Hwang, J., He, T., and Kim, Y. 2007. Exploring in-situ sensing irregularity in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 5^th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys'07). 547--561.
15. Ihler, A. T., Fisher, J. W., Moses, R. L., and Willsky, A. S. 2004. Nonparametric belief propagation for self-calibration in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN'04). 225--233.
16. Li, D. and Hu, Y.-H. 2003. Energy-based collaborative source localization using acoustic microsensor array. EUROSIP J. Appl. Signal Process. 2003, 4, 321--337.
17. Li, D., Wong, K. D., Hu, Y.-H., and Sayeed, A. M. 2002. Detection, classification and tracking of targets in distributed sensor networks. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 19, 2, 17--30.
18. Miluzzo, E., Lane, N., Campbell, A., and Olfati-Saber, R. 2008. CaliBree: A self-calibration system for mobile sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 4^th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS'08). 314--331.
19. Moses, R. and Patterson, R. 2002. Self-calibration of sensor networks. In SPIE: Unattended Ground Sensor Technologies and Applications IV. Vol. 4743. 491.
20. Ni, K., Ramanathan, N., Chehade, M., Balzano, L., Nair, S., Zahedi, S., Kohler, E., Pottie, G., Hansen, M., and Srivastava, M. 2009. Sensor network data fault types. ACM Trans. Sensor Netw. 5, 3, 25.
21. Ramanathan, N., Balzano, L., Burt, M., Estrin, D., Harmon, T., Harvey, C., Jay, J., Kohler, E., Rothenberg, S., and Srivastava, M. 2006. Rapid deployment with confidence: Calibration and fault detection in environmental sensor networks. Tech. rep., Center for Embedded Networked Sensing, UCLA.
22. Robertson, C. and Williams, D. 1971. Lambert absorption coefficients of water in the infrared. J. Optim. Soc. Amer. 61, 10, 1316--1320.
23. Rousseeuw, P., Leroy, A., and Wiley, J. 1987. Robust Regression and Outlier Detection. Vol. 3. Wiley Online Library.
24. Santini, S. and Romer, K. 2006. An adaptive strategy for quality-based data reduction in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 3^rd International Conference on Networked Sensing Systems (INSS'06). 29--36.
25. Sheng, X. and Hu, Y.-H. 2005. Maximum likelihood multiple-source localization using acoustic energy measurements with wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 53, 1, 44--53.
26. Tan, R., Xing, G., Liu, X., Yao, J., and Yuan, Z. 2010. Adaptive calibration for fusion-based wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 29^th Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM'10). 1--9.
27. Varshney, P. K. 1996. Distributed Detection and Data Fusion. Springer.
28. Whitehouse, K. and Culler, D. 2002. Calibration as parameter estimation in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1^st ACM International Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications (WSNA'02). 59--67.
29. Woo, A., Tong, T., and Culler, D. 2003. Taming the underlying challenges of reliable multihop routing in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1^st ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys'03). 14--27.
30. Zhuang, Y., Chen, L., Wang, X., and Lian, J. 2007. A weighted moving average-based approach for cleaning sensor data. In International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS'07).
31. Zuniga, M. and Krishnamachari, B. 2004. Analyzing the transitional region in low power wireless links. In Proceedings of the 1^st IEEE International Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON'04). 517--526.

Index Terms

• Computer systems organization

  • Embedded and cyber-physical systems

  • Real-time systems

• Hardware

  • Hardware test

  • Robustness