skip to main content
10.1145/2484028.2484172acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Ranking explanatory sentences for opinion summarization

Published:28 July 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

We introduce a novel sentence ranking problem called explanatory sentence extraction (ESE) which aims to rank sentences in opinionated text based on their usefulness for helping users understand the detailed reasons of sentiments (i.e., "explanatoriness"). We propose and study several general methods for scoring the explanatoriness of a sentence. We create new data sets and propose a new measure for evaluation. Experiment results show that the proposed methods are effective, outperforming a state of the art sentence ranking method for standard text summarization.

References

  1. X. Ding, B. Liu, and P. S. Yu. A holistic lexicon-based approach to opinion mining. In WSDM '08: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Web search and web data mining, pages 231--240, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. G. Erkan and D. R. Radev. Lexrank: graph-based lexical centrality as salience in text summarization. J. Artif. Int. Res., 22(1):457--479, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. E. Hovy and C.-Y. Lin. Automated text summarization in SUMMARIST. In I. Mani and M. T. Maybury, editors, Advances in Automatic Text Summarization. MIT Press, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M. Hu and B. Liu. Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In KDD '04: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 168--177, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. Hu and B. Liu. Mining opinion features in customer reviews. In AAAI'04: Proceedings of the 19th national conference on Artifical intelligence, pages 755--760. AAAI Press, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Hu and B. Liu. Opinion extraction and summarization on the web. In AAAI'06: proceedings of the 21st national conference on Artificial intelligence, pages 1621--1624. AAAI Press, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. K. S. Jones, S. Walker, and S. E. Robertson. A probabilistic model of information retrieval: development and comparative experiments. Inf. Process. Manage., 36(6):779--808, Nov. 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. J. Kupiec, J. Pedersen, and F. Chen. A trainable document summarizer. In SIGIR '95: Proceedings of the 18th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 68--73, New York, NY, USA, 1995. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. C. D. Paice. Constructing literature abstracts by computer: techniques and prospects. Inf. Process. Manage., 26(1):171--186, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Ranking explanatory sentences for opinion summarization

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SIGIR '13: Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
          July 2013
          1188 pages
          ISBN:9781450320344
          DOI:10.1145/2484028

          Copyright © 2013 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 28 July 2013

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • short-paper

          Acceptance Rates

          SIGIR '13 Paper Acceptance Rate73of366submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader