skip to main content
10.1145/2487294.2487332acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescprConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Determinants of success in crowdsourcing software development

Published:30 May 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the advent of digitization, recent years have witnessed a surge toward collective undertaking of production process different from traditional ways of organizing. In this vein, crowdsourcing has lent itself into a successful emerging mode of organizing and firms are increasingly using it in their value creation activities. However, despite popularity in practice, crowdsourcing has received little attention from IS scholars. Specifically, what the determinants of success in this model are remains an unexplored area of research that we strive to address in this paper. We focus on software development via crowdsourcing and drawing on studies from IS success, OSS and software development, we build a model of success that has three determinants: the characteristics of the project, the composition of the crowd and the relationship among key players. Finally, we describe our research methodology and conclude with potential contributions of our work.

References

  1. Sieg, J.H., M.W. Wallin, and G. Von Krogh, "Managerial challenges in open innovation: a study of innovation intermediation in the chemical industry". R&d Management, 2010. 40(3): p. 281--291.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Brabham, D.C., "Moving the crowd at threadless". Information, Communication & Society, 2010. 13(8): p. 1122--1145.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jouret, G., "Inside Cisco's search for the next big idea". Harvard business review, 2009. 87(9): p. 43--45.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Benbasat, I. and R.W. Zmud, "The identity crisis within the IS discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline's core properties". Mis Quarterly, 2003: p. 183--194. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Lakhani, K., D. Garvin, and E. Lonstein, "TopCoder (A): Developing software through crowdsourcing". Harvard Business School General Management Unit case, 2010(610-032).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Oshri, I., J. Kotlarsky, and L.P. Willcocks, The handbook of global outsourcing and offshoring 2011: Palgrave Macmillan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Mahnke, V., J. Wareham, and N. Bjorn-Andersen, "Offshore middlemen: transnational intermediation in technology sourcing". Journal of Information Technology, 2008. 23(1): p. 18--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Wexler, M.N., "Reconfiguring the sociology of the crowd: exploring crowdsourcing". International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 2011. 31(1/2): p. 6--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Meirelles, P., et al. A study of the relationships between source code metrics and attractiveness in free software projects. in Software Engineering (SBES), 2010 Brazilian Symposium on. 2010. IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. De Wulf, K., et al., "The role of pleasure in web site success". Information & Management, 2006. 43(4): p. 434--446. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Soh, C., M.L. Markus, and K.H. Goh, "Electronic marketplaces and price transparency: Strategy, information technology, and success". Mis Quarterly, 2006. 30(3): p. 705--723. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Gil-García, J.R. and T.A. Pardo, "E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations". Government Information Quarterly, 2005. 22(2): p. 187--216.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Markus, M.L., "Toward a theory of knowledge reuse: Types of knowledge reuse situations and factors in reuse success". Journal of Management Information Systems, 2001. 18(1): p. 57--94. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Wu, J.-H. and Y.-M. Wang, "Measuring KMS success: A respecification of the DeLone and McLean's model". Information & Management, 2006. 43(6): p. 728--739. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Häyrinen, K., K. Saranto, and P. Nykänen, "Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature". International journal of medical informatics, 2008. 77(5): p. 291.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Sharma, R. and P. Yetton, "The contingent effects of training, technical complexity, and task interdependence on successful information systems implementation". Mis Quarterly, 2007. 31(2): p. 219--238. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Wixom, B.H. and H.J. Watson, "An empirical investigation of the factors affecting data warehousing success". Mis Quarterly, 2001. 25(1): p. 17--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Subramaniam, C., R. Sen, and M.L. Nelson, "Determinants of open source software project success: A longitudinal study". Decision Support Systems, 2009. 46(2): p. 576--585. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Howe, J. The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Magazine, 2006. 14, 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Greengard, S., "Following the crowd". Communications of the ACM, 2011. 54(2): p. 20--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Huston, L. and N. Sakkab, "Connect and develop". Harvard business review, 2006. 84(3): p. 58--66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Bonabeau, E., "Decisions 2.0: the power of collective intelligence". Mit Sloan Management Review, 2009. 50(2): p. 45--52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Cook, S., "The contribution revolution". Harvard business review, 2008. 86(10): p. 60--69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Doan, A., R. Ramakrishnan, and A.Y. Halevy, "Crowdsourcing systems on the World-Wide Web". Communications of the ACM, 2011. 54(4): p. 86--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Haythornthwaite, C. Crowds and communities: Light and heavyweight models of peer production. 2009. IEEE Computer Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Proulx, S., et al., "Paradoxical empowerment of produsers in the context of informational capitalism". New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 2011. 17(1): p. 9--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Afuah, A. and C.L. Tucci, "Crowdsourcing As a Solution to Distant Search". Academy of Management review, 2012. 37(3): p. 355--375.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Leimeister, J., et al., "Leveraging crowdsourcing: activation-supporting components for IT-based ideas competition". Journal of Management Information Systems, 2009. 26(1): p. 197--224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Agarwal, R. and H.C. Lucas Jr, "The information systems identity crisis: Focusing on high-visibility and high-impact research". Mis Quarterly, 2005: p. 381--398. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Frey, B.S. and R. Jegen, "Motivation crowding theory". Journal of economic surveys, 2001. 15(5): p. 589--611.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Raymond, E., "The cathedral and the bazaar". Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 1999. 12(3): p. 23--49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. DeLone, W.H. and E.R. McLean, "Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable". Information systems research, 1992. 3(1): p. 60--95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Seddon, P.B., "A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success". Information systems research, 1997. 8(3): p. 240--53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Crowston, K., H. Annabi, and J. Howison, "Defining open source software project success". Former Departments, Centers, Institutes and Projects, 2003: p. 4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Comino, S., F.M. Manenti, and M.L. Parisi, "From planning to mature: On the success of open source projects". Research Policy, 2007. 36(10): p. 1575--1586.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Liang, T.P., et al., "Effect of team diversity on software project performance". Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2007. 107(5): p. 636--653.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Kotlarsky, J. and I. Oshri, "Social ties, knowledge sharing and successful collaboration in globally distributed system development projects". European Journal of Information Systems, 2005. 14(1): p. 37--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Kotlarsky, J., P.C. Van Fenema, and L.P. Willcocks, "Developing a knowledge-based perspective on coordination: The case of global software projects". Information & Management, 2008. 45(2): p. 96--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Rottman, J.W. and M.C. Lacity, "Proven Practices for Effectively Offshoring Proven Practices for Effectively Offshoring IT Work". Mit Sloan Management Review, 2006. 47(3): p. 56--63.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Srikanth, K. and P. Puranam, "Integrating distributed work: comparing task design, communication, and tacit coordination mechanisms". Strategic Management Journal, 2011. 32(8): p. 849--875.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Singh, P.V., Y. Tan, and V. Mookerjee, "Network effects: The influence of structural social capital on open source project success". SSRN eLibrary, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Stewart, K.J. and S. Gosain, "The impact of ideology on effectiveness in open source software development teams". Mis Quarterly, 2006: p. 291--314. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Agerfalk, P.J. and B. Fitzgerald, "" Outsourcing to an Unknown Workforce: Exploring Opensourcing as a Global Sourcing Strategy". Management Information Systems Quarterly, 2008. 32(2): p. 385--409. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Zigurs, I. and B.K. Buckland, "A theory of task/technology fit and group support systems effectiveness". Mis Quarterly, 1998: p. 313--334. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Horton, J.J. and L.B. Chilton. The labor economics of paid crowdsourcing. 2010. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Gopal, A. and B.R. Koka, "The Role of Contracts on Quality and Returns to Quality in Offshore Software Development Outsourcing". Decision Sciences, 2010. 41(3): p. 491--516.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Gopal, A., et al., "Contracts in offshore software development: An empirical analysis". Management Science, 2003: p. 1671--1683. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Liker, J.K. and T.Y. Choi, "Building deep supplier relationships". Harvard business review, 2004. 82(12): p. 104--113.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Determinants of success in crowdsourcing software development

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGMIS-CPR '13: Proceedings of the 2013 annual conference on Computers and people research
      May 2013
      208 pages
      ISBN:9781450319751
      DOI:10.1145/2487294

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 May 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGMIS-CPR '13 Paper Acceptance Rate29of33submissions,88%Overall Acceptance Rate300of480submissions,63%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader