skip to main content
10.1145/2487788.2487967acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Linking inside a video collection: what and how to measure?

Published:13 May 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Although linking video to additional information sources seems to be a sensible approach to satisfy information needs of user, the perspective of users is not yet analyzed on a fundamental level in real-life scenarios. However, a better understanding of the motivation of users to follow links in video, which anchors users prefer to link from within a video, and what type of link targets users are typically interested in, is important to be able to model automatic linking of audiovisual content appropriately. In this paper we report on our methodology towards eliciting user requirements with respect to video linking in the course of a broader study on user requirements in searching and a series of benchmark evaluations on searching and linking.

References

  1. R. Aly, K. McGuinness, S. Chen, N. E. O'Conner, K. Chatfield, O. M. Parkhi, R. Arandjelovic, A. Zisserman, B. Fernando, T. Tuytelaars, D. Oneata, M. Douze, J. Revaud, D. P. J. Schwenninger, H. Wang, Z. Harchaoui, J. Verbeek, and C. Schmid. AXES at TRECVid 2012. In TREC 2012 Video Retrieval Evaluation Online Proceedings (TRECVid 2012), Geithesburg, U.S., December 2012. NIST.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. R. Aly, K. McGuinness, M. Kleppe, R. Ordelman, N. E. O'Connor, and F. de Jong. Link anchors in images: Is there truth? In Proceedings of the 12th Dutch Belgian Information Retrieval Workshop (DIR 2012), pages 1--4, Ghent, 2012. University Ghent.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. Bron, B. Huurnink, and M. de Rijke. Linking archives using document enrichment and term selection. In Proceedings of TPDL 2011, pages 2357--2360, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. K. Chatfield and A. Zisserman. Visor: Towards on-the-fly large-scale object category retrieval. In Asian Conference on Computer Vision, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. Eskevich, G. J. F. Jones, M. Larson, C. Wartena, R. Aly, T. Verschoor, and R. Ordelman. Comparing retrieval effectiveness of alternative content segmentation methods for internet video search. In 10th Workshop on Content-Based Multimedia Indexing, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. A. Foster and N. Ford. Serendipity and information seeking: an empirical study. Journal of Documentation, 59(3):321--340, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. A. Girgensohn, L. Wilcox, F. Shipman, and S. Bly. Designing affordances for the navigation of detail-on-demand hypervideo. In Proceedings of AVI 2004, pages 290--297. ACM, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. W. F. L. Heeren, L. B. van der Werff, R. J. F. Ordelman, A. J. van Hessen, and F. M. G. de Jong. Radio Oranje: Searching the Queen's speech(es). In C. L. A. Clarke, N. Fuhr, N. Kando, W. Kraaij, and A. P. de Vries, editors, Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGIR, Amsterdam, page 903, New York, July 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. P. Hoffmann, T. Kochems, and M. Herczeg. HyLive: Hypervideo-Authoring for Live Television. In Changing Television Environments, pages 51--60. Springer, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. B. Meixner, K. Matusik, C. Grill, and H. Kosch. Towards an easy to use authoring tool for interactive non-linear video. Multimedia Tools and Applications, pages 1--26, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. Morang, R. J. F. Ordelman, F. M. G. de Jong, and A. J. van Hessen. InfoLink: analysis of Dutch broadcast news and cross-media browsing. In Proceedings of ICME 2005, Los Alamitos, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. O. M. Parkhi, A. Vedaldi, and A. Zisserman. On-the-fly specific person retrieval. In International Workshop on Image Analysis for Multimedia Interactive Services. IEEE, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. I. Sawhney, N. and Balcom, D. and Smith. Authoring and navigating video in space and time. MultiMedia, IEEE, 4(4):30--39, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. F. Shipman, A. Girgensohn, and L. Wilcox. Authoring, viewing, and generating hypervideo: An overview of Hyper-Hitchcock. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl., 5(2):15:1--15:19, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. A. F. Smeaton, P. Over, and W. Kraaij. Evaluation campaigns and trecvid. In MIR '06: Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Workshop on Multimedia Information Retrieval, pages 321--330, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. S. Tan, C.-W. Ngo, H.-K. Tan, and L. Pang. Cross media hyperlinking for search topic browsing. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Multimedia, MM '11, pages 243--252, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Linking inside a video collection: what and how to measure?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WWW '13 Companion: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web
      May 2013
      1636 pages
      ISBN:9781450320382
      DOI:10.1145/2487788

      Copyright © 2013 Copyright is held by the International World Wide Web Conference Committee (IW3C2).

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 May 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      WWW '13 Companion Paper Acceptance Rate831of1,250submissions,66%Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader