skip to main content
10.1145/2494266.2494288acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocengConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Interacting with digital cultural heritage collections via annotations: the CULTURA approach

Published:10 September 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper introduces the main characteristics of the digital cultural collections that constitute the use cases presently in use in the CULTURA environment. A section on related work follows giving an account on efforts on the management of digital annotations that are pertinent and that have been considered. Afterwards the innovative annotation features of the CULTURA portal for digital humanities are described; those features are aimed at improving the interaction of non-specialist users and general public with digital cultural heritage content. The annotation functions consist of two modules: the FAST annotation service as back-end and the CAT Web front-end integrated in the CULTURA portal. The annotation features have been, and are being, tested with different types of users and useful feedback is being collated, with the overall aim of generalising the approach to diverse document collections and not only the area of cultural heritage.

References

  1. Agosti, M. (1996). An overview of hypertext. In Agosti, M. and Smeaton, A., editors, Information Retrieval and Hypertext. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, pages 27--47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Agosti, M., and Ferro N. (2003). Annotations: enriching a digital library. In Koch, T., and Sølvberg, I. T., editors, Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Research andAdvanced Technology for Digital Libraries (ECDL 2003), LNCS 2769. Springer, Heidelberg, pages 88--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Agosti, M., Ferro, N., Frommholz, I., and Thiel, U. (2004). Annotations in Digital Libraries and Collaboratories - Facets, Models and Usage. In Heery, R. and Lyon, L., editors, Proc. 8th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (ECDL 2004), pages 244--255. LNCS 3232, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Agosti, M. and Ferro, N. (2005). Annotations as context for searching documents. In Crestani, F. and Ruthven, I., editors, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science - Context: Nature, Impact and Role. LNCS 3507. Springer, Heidelberg, pages 155--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Agosti, M., Ferro. N., and Orio, N. (2005). Annotating illuminated manuscripts: an effective tool for research and education. In: Marlino, M., Sumner, T. and Shipman III, F.M., editors, Proc. 5th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL 2005), ACM Press, New York, USA, 2005, pages 121--130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Agosti, M. and Ferro, N. (2006). Search Strategies for finding annotations and annotated documents: the FAST Service. In Larsen, H. L., Pasi, G., Ortiz-Arroyo, D., Andreasen, T., and Christiansen, H., editors, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Flexible Query Answering Systems (FQAS 2006), LNAI 4027. Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 270--281. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Agosti, M., Bonfiglio-Dosio, G., and Ferro, N. (2007). A Historical and Contemporary Study on Annotations to Derive Key Features for Systems Design. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 8(1):1--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Agosti, M., Ferro, N., and Orio, N. (2007). Annotations as a Tool for Disclosing Hidden Relationships Between Illuminated Manuscripts. In Basili, R. and Pazienza, M. T., editors, Proceedings of AI*IA 2007: Artificial Intelligence and Human-Oriented Computing, 10th Congress of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence, LNCS 4733, Springer, pages 662--673. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Agosti, M. and Ferro, N. (2008). A Formal Model of Annotations of Digital Content. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 26(1):3:1--3:57. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Barbera, N., Meschini, F., Morbidoni, C., and Tomasi, F. (2012). Annotating digital libraries and electronic editions in a collaborative and semantic perspective. In Agosti, M., Esposito, F., Ferilli, S., and Ferro, N., editors, Digital Libraries and Archives. 8th Italian Research Conference (IRCDL 2012),. CCIS 354, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, pages 46--57.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Bélanger, M.-E. (2010, 02 03). Ideals. Retrieved 10 25, 2012, from https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/15035/belanger.pdf?sequence=2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Bhagwat, D., Chiticariu, L., Tan, W.-C., and Vijayvargiya, G. (2004) An annotation management system for relational databases. In: Nascimento, M. A., Özsu, M. T., Kossmann, D., Miller, R. J., Blakeley, J. A., and Schiefer, K. B., editors, Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB 2004). Morgan Kaufmann, pages 900--911. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Brickley, D. and Guha, R.V. (2004). RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema - W3C Recommendation 10 Feb 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Buneman, P., Kostylev, E. V., and Vansummeren, S. (2013). Annotations are relative. In Tan, W.-C., Guerrini, G., Catania, B., and Gounaris, A., editors, Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2013). ACM, New York, NY, USA, pages 177--188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Candela, L., Castelli, D., Ferro, N., Koutrika, G., Meghini, C., Pagano, P., Ross, S., Soergel, D., Agosti, M., Dobreva, M., Katifori, V., and Schuldt, H. (2007). The DELOS Digital Library Reference Model. Foundations for Digital Libraries. ISTI-CNR at Gruppo ALI, Pisa, Italy. http://www.delos.info/files/pdf/ReferenceModel/DELOS_DLReferenceModel_0.98.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Deep Liquid, jCrop, http://deepliquid.com/content/Jcrop.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferro, N. (2009). Annotation Search: The FAST Way. In Agosti, M., Borbinha, J., Kapidakis, S., Papatheodorou, C., and Tsakonas, G., editors, Proc. 13th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (ECDL 2009), pages 15--26. LNCS 5714, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Ferro, N. and Silvello, G. (2013). NESTOR: A Formal Model for Digital Archives. Information Processing & Management, 49(6):1206--1240..Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Fielding, R. T. and Taylor, R. N. (2002). Principled Design of the Modern Web Architecture. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT), 2(2):115--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Hallam-Baker, P. M. and Behlendorf, B. (1996). Extended Log File Format - W3C Working DraftWD-logfile-960323. http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-logfile.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Hampson, C., Agosti, M., Orio, N., Bailey, E., Lawless, S., Conlan, O., and Wade, V. (2012). The CULTURA Project: Supporting Next Generation Interaction with Digital Cultural Heritage Collections. In Progress in Cultural Heritage Preservation - 4th International Conference (EuroMed 2012), pages 668--675. LNCS 7616, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Hampson, C., Lawless, S., Bailey, E., Yogev, S., Zwerdling, N., Carmel, D., Conlan, O., O'Connor, A. and Wade, V. (2012). CULTURA: A Metadata-Rich Environment to Support the Enhanced Interrogation of Cultural Collections. In Metadata and Semantics Research - 6th Research Conference (MTSR 2012), pages 227--238. CCIS 343, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Kahan, J. and Koivunen, M.-R. (2001) Annotea: an open RDF infrastructure for shared Web annotations. In Shen, V. Y., Saito, N., Lyu, M. R., and Zurko, M. E., editors, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW 2001), ACM Press, New York, pages 623--632. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Kostylev, E. V. and Buneman, P. (2012). Combining dependent annotations for relational algebra. In Deutsch, A., editor, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2012). ACM, New York, NY, USA, pages 196--207. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Lawless, S., Hampson, C., Mitankin, P., and Gerdjikov, S. (2013). Normalisation in Historical Text Collections. In Proceedings of Digital Humanities 2013, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA {In Press}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Marshall, C. C. (1998). Toward an ecology of hypertext annotation. In Akscyn, R., editor, Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (HT 1998): links, objects, time and space-structure in hypermedia systems, pages 40--49. ACM Press, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Martínez, J. M. (editor) (2004). MPEG-7 Overview. ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11N6828. Palma de Mallorca, Spain, pages 74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. MPEG home page, http://www.chiariglione.org/mpegGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Nagao, K. (2003). Digital content annotation and transcoding. Artech House Publishers. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. OASIS Search Web Services Technical Committee (2012). searchRetrieve: Part 5. CQL: The Contextual Query Language Version 1.0. http://docs.oasis-open.org/search-ws/searchRetrieve/v1.0/searchRetrieve-v1.0-part5-cql.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Okfn. (n.d.). Okfn Annotator. Retrieved 06 2012, from http://okfnlabs.org/annotator/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Rangy, http://code.google.com/p/rangy/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Salton, G., Fox, E. A., and Wu, H. (1983). Extended Boolean Information Retrieval. Communications of the ACM (CACM), 26(11):1022--1036. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Sanderson, R. and Van de Sompel, H. (2010). Making web annotations persistent over time. In Hunter, J., Lagoze, C., Giles, C. L., and Li, Y.-F., editors, Proceedings of the 2010 Joint International Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL 2010). ACM, pages 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. TILE. (2011). TILE: text-image linking environment. Retrieved 07 2012, from http://mith.umd.edu/tile/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Trinity College Dublin, 1641 Depositions. http://1641.tcd.ie/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Università degli Studi di Padova, IPSA (Imaginum Patavinae Scientiae Archivum). http:/ipsa.dei.unipd.it/en_GB/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang, X., Ye, L., Keogh, E., and Shelton, C. (2008). Annotating historical archives of images. In Larsen, R. L., Paepcke, A., Borbinha, J. L., and Naaman, M., editors, Proceedins of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL 2008), ACM, pages 341--350. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Interacting with digital cultural heritage collections via annotations: the CULTURA approach

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          DocEng '13: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM symposium on Document engineering
          September 2013
          582 pages
          ISBN:9781450317894
          DOI:10.1145/2494266

          Copyright © 2013 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 10 September 2013

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          DocEng '13 Paper Acceptance Rate16of50submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate178of537submissions,33%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader