ABSTRACT
Touchless gestural interaction enables users to interact with digital devices using body movements and gestures, and without the burden of a physical contact with technology (e.g., data gloves, body markers, or remote controllers). Most gesture-based touchless applications are designed for interaction with medium or, more often, large displays. Our research instead explores touchless gestural interaction "in-the- small", where the user interacts with small displays, of the size, for example, of a smart phone screen. Our work applies this to the domain of household appliances. We describe the design and evaluation of MOTIC (MOtion-based Touchless Interactive Cooking system), and highlight the complexity of employing touchless gestures to interact with visual interfaces constrained in size. This case study shows how existing design guidelines, mostly conceived for touchless gestural interaction "in the large", can be adapted and applied for gestural interaction in-the-small, and high-lights that touchless gestures have the potential of forming a valuable addition to our repertoire of interaction techniques with small displays.
- Ali Bigdelou, Loren Arthur Schwarz, N. N. An adaptive solution for intra-operative gesture-based human-machine interaction. Proc. IUI 2012, ACM (2012), 75--84 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ashbrook, D., Starner, T. Magic: a motion gesture design tool. Proc. CHI 2010, ACM (2010), 2159--2168. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Baudel, T., and Beaudouin-Lafon, M. Charade: remote control of objects using free-hand gestures. CACM 36, 7 (1993), 28--35. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bellucci, A., Malizia, A., Diaz, P., Aedo, I. Humandisplay interaction technology: Emerging remote interfaces for pervasive display environments. Pervasive Computing, IEEE 9, 2 (2010), 72--76. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Benavidez, P., and Jamshidi, M. Mobile robot navigation and target tracking system. Proc. SoSE 2011, (2011), 299--304.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Beyer, G., Alt, F., Müller, J., Schmidt, A., Isakovic, K., Klose, S., Schiewe, M., and Haulsen, I. Audience behavior around large interactive cylindrical screens. Proc. CHI 2011, ACM (2011), 1021--1030. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cassell, J. A framework for gesture generation and interpretation. Computer Vision in Human-Machine Interaction (1998), 191--215.Google Scholar
- De la Barré, R., Chojecki, P., Leiner, U., Mühlbach, L., and Ruschin, D. Touchless interaction-novel chances and challenges. In Human-Computer Interaction. Novel Interaction Methods and Techniques, J. Jacko, (ed.), LNCS 5611Springer (2009) 161--169. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Döring, T., Kern, D., Marshall, P., Pfeiffer, M., Schöning, S., Gruhn, V, Schmidt, A. Gestural interaction on the steering wheel: reducing the visual demand. Proc. CHI 2011, ACM (2011), 483--492 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Grandhi, S. A., Joue, G., and Mittelberg, I. Understanding naturalness and intuitiveness in gesture production: insights for touchless gestural interfaces. Proc. CHI 2011, ACM (2011), 821--824. Google ScholarDigital Library
- http://www.microsoft.com/enus/kinectforwindows/Google Scholar
- http://www.xbox.com/en us/kinectGoogle Scholar
- Johnson, R., O'Hara, K., Sellen, A., Cousins, C., and Criminisi, A. Exploring the potential for touchless interaction in image-guided interventional radiology. Proc. CHI 2011, ACM (2011), 3323--3332. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Heydekorn, J., Frisch, M., Dachselt, R.: Prospects of user elicited gestural interaction techniques. CHI 2010 Workshop on Natural User Interfaces: The Prospect and Challenge of Touch and Gestural Computing..Google Scholar
- Kuikkaniemi, K., Jacucci, G., Turpeinen, M., Hoggan, E., and Muandller, J. From space to stage: How interactive screens will change urban life. Computer 44, 6 (2011), 40--47. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kurtenbach, G., and Hulteen., E. Gestures in Human-Computer Communication. Addison-Wesley(1990).Google Scholar
- Maged N., Kamel B., Bryan J., Blanchard, C. W. J. M. A. T., and Gutierrez-Osuna, R. Web gis in practice: a microsoft kinect natural user interface for google earth navigation. Int. J. health geographics (2011), 10--45.Google Scholar
- Malizia, A. and Bellucci, A. The artificiality of natural user interfaces. CACM 55, 3 (March 2012), 36--38. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ng, J., Sim, T.-J., Foo, Y.-S., and Yeo, V. Gesture-based interaction with virtual 3d objects on large display: what makes it fun? Proc. CHI EA 2009, ACM (2009), 3751--3756. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nielsen, M., et al. Moeslund, T., Storring, M. and Granum, E. A Procedure for developing intuitive and ergonomic gesture interfaces for HCI. Proc. Gesture-Based Communication in Human-Computer Interaction: 5th Int. Gesture Workshop, GW 2003, LNCS 2915, Springer, Berlin (2004), 409--420.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Norman, D. A, Natural user interfaces are not natural. interactions, v.17 n.3, May + June 2010 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Norman, D. A, Nielsen, J. Gestural interfaces: a step backward in usability. interactions, v.17 n.5, September + October 2010 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pickering, C. A, Burnham, K. J, Richardson, M. J. A Research Study of Hand Gesture Recognition Technologies and Applications for Human Vehicle Interaction. Proc. Automotive Electronics, 3rd Institution of Engineering and Technology Conference (2007), 1--15Google Scholar
- Riener A. Gestural Interaction in Vehicular Applications. IEEE Computer, 42--47 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Scoditti, A., Blanch, R., and Coutaz.J. A novel taxonomy for gestural interaction techniques based on accelerometers. Proc. IUI 2011, ACM (2011), 63--72 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shan, C. Gesture control for consumer electronics. In Multimedia Interaction and Intelligent User Interfaces, L. Shao, C. Shan, J. Luo, and M. Etoh, (eds.), Advances in Pattern Recognition. Springer, 2010, pp. 107--128.Google Scholar
- Sven, G., Markus L., F. D. M. B. A. K. Using intelligent natural user interfaces to support sales conversations. Proc. IUI 2012, ACM (2012), 97--100 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vatavu, R.,. 2012. User-defined gestures for free-hand TV control. In Proceedings of the 10th European conference on Interactive tv and video (EuroiTV '12). ACM, 45--48. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wachs, J. P., Kölsch, M., Stern, H., and Edan, Y. Vision-based hand-gesture applications. CACM 54, 2 (2011), 60--71. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wei, J., Wang, X., Peiris, R. L., Choi, Y., Martinez, X. R., Tache, R., Koh, J. T. K. V., Halupka, V., and Cheok, A. D. Codine: an interactive multi-sensory system for remote dining. Proc. UbiComp 2011, ACM (2011), 21--30. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wobbrock, J. O., Morris, M. R., and Wilson, A. D. 2009. User-defined gestures for surface computing. In Proc. CHI '09. ACM (2009), 1083--1092. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Touchless gestural interaction with small displays: a case study
Recommendations
Models for Rested Touchless Gestural Interaction
SUI '15: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Symposium on Spatial User InteractionTouchless mid-air gestural interaction has gained mainstream attention with the emergence of off-the-shelf commodity devices such as the Leap Motion and the Xbox Kinect. One of the issues with this form of interaction is fatigue, a problem colloquially ...
Biting, Whirling, Crawling - Children's Embodied Interaction with Walk-through Displays
INTERACT '09: Proceedings of the 12th IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Part IUnderstanding of embodied interaction in the context of walk-through displays and designing for it is very limited. This study examined children's intuitive embodied interaction with a large, semi-visible, projective walk-through display and space ...
"Don't touch the oven": motion-based touchless interaction with household appliances
AVI '12: Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual InterfacesMotion-based touchless interaction empowers users to interact using movements and gestures, and without the burden of physical contact with technology (e.g., data gloves, body markers, or remote controllers). Most motion-based touchless applications are ...
Comments