skip to main content
10.1145/2499777.2499779acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessplcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Clafer tools for product line engineering

Published:26 August 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Clafer is a lightweight yet expressive language for structural modeling: feature modeling and configuration, class and object modeling, and metamodeling. Clafer Tools is an integrated set of tools based on Clafer. In this paper, we describe some product-line variability modeling scenarios of Clafer Tools from the viewpoints of product-line owner, product-line engineer, and product engineer.

References

  1. Alloy. http://alloy.mit.edu.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Choco. http://www.emn.fr/z-info/choco-solver.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Clafer Compiler. https://github.com/gsdlab/clafer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Clafer Configurator. https://github.com/gsdlab/ClaferConfigurator.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Clafer Homepage. http://clafer.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Clafer Wiki. https://github.com/gsdlab/claferWiki.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. ClaferIG. https://github.com/gsdlab/claferIG.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. ClaferMOO. https://github.com/gsdlab/claferMoo.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. ClaferMoo Visualizer. https://github.com/gsdlab/claferMooVisualizer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Common Variability Language revised submission, 2012. http://www.omgwiki.org/variability/doku.php#cvl_revised_submission.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. K. Bąk, K. Czarnecki, and A. Wąsowski. Feature and meta-models in clafer: Mixed, specialized and coupled. In International Conference on Software Language Engineering, pages 291--301, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. Guo, K. Czarnecki, S. Apel, N. Siegmund, and A. Wasowski. Why CART works for variability-aware performance prediction? an empirical study on performance distributions. Technical report, GSD Lab, University of Waterloo, 04/2013 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. A. Murashkin, M. Antkiewicz, D. Rayside, and K. Czarnecki. Visualization and exploration of optimal variants in product line engineering.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. R. Olaechea, S. Stewart, K. Czarnecki, and D. Rayside. Modeling and multi-objective optimization of quality attributes in variability-rich software. In NFPinDSML, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Clafer tools for product line engineering

                            Recommendations

                            Comments

                            Login options

                            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                            Sign in
                            • Published in

                              cover image ACM Other conferences
                              SPLC '13 Workshops: Proceedings of the 17th International Software Product Line Conference co-located workshops
                              August 2013
                              148 pages
                              ISBN:9781450323253
                              DOI:10.1145/2499777

                              Copyright © 2013 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

                              Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

                              Publisher

                              Association for Computing Machinery

                              New York, NY, United States

                              Publication History

                              • Published: 26 August 2013

                              Check for updates

                              Qualifiers

                              • research-article

                              Acceptance Rates

                              Overall Acceptance Rate167of463submissions,36%

                            PDF Format

                            View or Download as a PDF file.

                            PDF

                            eReader

                            View online with eReader.

                            eReader