skip to main content
10.1145/2501025.2501033acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

ProfileRank: finding relevant content and influential users based on information diffusion

Published:11 August 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Understanding information diffusion processes that take place on the Web, specially in social media, is a fundamental step towards the design of effective information diffusion mechanisms, recommendation systems, and viral marketing/advertising campaigns. Two key concepts in information diffusion are influence and relevance. Influence is the ability to popularize content in an online community. To this end, influentials introduce and propagate relevant content, in the sense that such content satisfies the information needs of a significant portion of this community.

In this paper, we study the problem of identifying influential users and relevant content in information diffusion data. We propose ProfileRank, a new information diffusion model based on random walks over a user-content graph. ProfileRank is a PageRank inspired model that exploits the principle that relevant content is created and propagated by influential users and influential users create relevant content. A convenient property of ProfileRank is that it can be adapted to provide personalized recommendations.

Experimental results demonstrate that ProfileRank makes accurate recommendations, outperforming baseline techniques. We also illustrate relevant content and influential users discovered using ProfileRank. Our analysis shows that ProfileRank scores are more correlated with content diffusion than with the network structure. We also show that our new modeling is more efficient than PageRank to perform these calculations.

References

  1. L. Adamic and E. Adar. Friends and neighbors on the web. Social networks, 25(3):211--230, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. R. Baeza-Yates, B. Ribeiro-Neto, et al. Modern information retrieval, volume 82. Addison-Wesley New York, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Baluja, R. Seth, D. Sivakumar, Y. Jing, J. Yagnik, S. Kumar, D. Ravichandran, and M. Aly. Video suggestion and discovery for youtube: taking random walks through the view graph. In WWW, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. Bianchini, M. Gori, and F. Scarselli. Inside pagerank. ACM Trans. Internet Technol., 5(1):92--128, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. Cha, H. Haddadi, F. Benevenuto, and K. P. Gummadi. Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy. In ICWSM, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. M. Cha, A. Mislove, and K. P. Gummadi. A measurement-driven analysis of information propagation in the flickr social network. In WWW, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. Chen, R. Nairn, L. Nelson, M. Bernstein, and E. Chi. Short and tweet: experiments on recommending content from information streams. In CHI, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. De Choudhury, S. Counts, and M. Czerwinski. Identifying relevant social media content: leveraging information diversity and user cognition. In HT, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. Franceschet. Pagerank: standing on the shoulders of giants. Commun. ACM, 54(6):92--101, June 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. N. Friedkin. A structural theory of social influence, volume 13. Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. M. Gomez Rodriguez, J. Leskovec, and A. Krause. Inferring networks of diffusion and influence. In SIGKDD, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. A. Goyal, F. Bonchi, and L. V. Lakshmanan. Learning influence probabilities in social networks. In WSDM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. D. Gruhl, R. Guha, D. Liben-Nowell, and A. Tomkins. Information diffusion through blogspace. In WWW, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Hannon, M. Bennett, and B. Smyth. Recommending twitter users to follow using content and collaborative filtering approaches. In RecSys, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Y. Kim and K. Shim. Twitobi: A recommendation system for twitter using probabilistic modeling. ICDM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. M. Kleinberg. Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. In SODA, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. H. Kwak, C. Lee, H. Park, and S. Moon. What is twitter, a social network or a news media? In WWW, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. V. Leroy, B. B. Cambazoglu, and F. Bonchi. Cold start link prediction. In SIGKDD, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. J. Leskovec, L. A. Adamic, and B. A. Huberman. The dynamics of viral marketing. ACM Trans. Web, 1(1):5, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. J. Leskovec, L. Backstrom, and J. Kleinberg. Meme-tracking and the dynamics of the news cycle. In SIGKDD, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. D. Liben-Nowell and J. Kleinberg. The link prediction problem for social networks. In CIKM, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Technical Report 1999-66, Stanford InfoLab, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. F. Ricci, L. Rokach, and B. Shapira. Introduction to recommender systems handbook. Recommender Systems Handbook, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. D. M. Romero, W. Galuba, S. Asur, and B. A. Huberman. Influence and passivity in social media. In PKDD, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. A. Silva, H. Valiati, S. Guimarães, and W. Meira Jr. From individual behavior to influence networks: A case study on twitter. In Webmedia, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. J. Tang, J. Sun, C. Wang, and Z. Yang. Social influence analysis in large-scale networks. In KDD, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. H. Tong, C. Faloutsos, and J.-Y. Pan. Fast random walk with restart and its applications. In ICDM, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. H. Tong, S. Papadimitriou, P. S. Yu, and C. Faloutsos. Proximity tracking on time-evolving bipartite graphs. In SDM, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. D. Watts. A twenty-first century science. Nature, 445(7127), 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. J. Weng, E.-P. Lim, J. Jiang, and Q. He. Twitterrank: finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers. In WSDM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. V. V. Williams. Multiplying matrices faster than coppersmith-winograd. In STOC, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. J. Yang and J. Leskovec. Patterns of temporal variation in online media. In WSDM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. ProfileRank: finding relevant content and influential users based on information diffusion

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SNAKDD '13: Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Social Network Mining and Analysis
      August 2013
      114 pages
      ISBN:9781450323307
      DOI:10.1145/2501025

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 August 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Upcoming Conference

      KDD '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader