skip to main content
research-article

Exploring Sustainable Practices in Workplace Settings through Visualizing Electricity Consumption

Published:01 November 2013Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

People’s domestic habits are increasingly being targeted to reduce levels of CO2 emissions. Whereas domestic energy consumption has received a lot of attention with several reported studies on sustainable practices, there are very few studies on workplace practices. Nevertheless, these are considered as having much potential for reducing energy consumption. This article presents the findings from two field studies where two different types of prototypes for visualizing energy use were designed, implemented and evaluated in different types of workplace settings -- factories and offices. The studies used design probes to explore how visual feedback for electricity use was interpreted and acted upon by employees in work settings. A striking observation was that it is very difficult to get people to change to more pro-environmental behavior and practices in a workplace environment. The article discusses why this might be the case.

References

  1. Bång, M., Gustafsson, A., and Katzeff, C. 2007. Promoting renewed domestic energy consumption patterns with pervasive learning games. In Persuasive Technology, W. Ijsselsteijn, Y. de Kort, C. Midden, B. Eggen, B. J. Fogg Eds., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4744, Springer, Berlin, 55--63. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bird, J. and Rogers, Y. 2010. The pulse of tidy street: Measuring and publicly displaying domestic electricity consumption. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Energy Awareness and Conservation through Pervasive Applications (Pervasive’10).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Blevis, E. 2007. Sustainable interaction design: Invention & disposal, renewal & reuse. In Proceedings of CHI 2007. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Broms, L. Katzeff, C., Bång, M., Nyblom Å., Ilstedt-hjelm, S., and Ehrnberger, K. 2010. Coffee maker patterns and the design of energy feedback artifacts. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS). ACM, 93--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bruce, T. 2008, Ett energieffektivare Sverige. Nationell handlingsplan för energieffektiviseringar - Bilaga till Energieffektiviseringsutredningens delbetänkande. Statens Offentliga Utredningar.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Brynjarsdóttir, H., Håkansson, M., Pierce, J., Baumer, E., DiSalvo, C., and Sengers, P. 2012. Sustainably unpersuaded: How persuasion narrows our vision of sustainability. In Proceedings of the ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’12). ACM, 947--956. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Darby, S., 2006. The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption. A Review for DEFRA of the Literature on Metering, Billing and Direct Displays. Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Darby, S. 2010. Smart metering: What potential for householder engagement? Build. Res. Inf. 38, 5, 442--457.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Disalvo, C., Sengers, P., and Brynjarsdóttir, H. 2010. Mapping the landscape of sustainable HCI. In Proceedings of CHI’10. ACM, New York, 1975--1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Diykyoto. 2008. http://www.diykyoto.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Fischer, C. 2008. Feedback on household electricity consumption. A tool for saving energy? Energy Efficiency 1, 79--104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Foster, D., Lawson, S., Linehan, C., Wardman, J., and Blythe, M. 2012. Watts in it for me? Design implications for implementing effective energy interventions in organisations. In Proceedings of CHI’12. ACM, 2357--2365. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Frayling, C. 1993/4. Research in art and design. Royal College of Art Papers 1, 1, 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Froelich, J., Findlater, L., and Landay, J. 2010. The design of eco-feedback technology. In Proceedings of CHI’10. ACM, New York, 1999--2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Gaver, W., Dunne, A., and Pacenti, E. 1999. Cultural probes. Interactions 6, 1, 21--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Gaver, W., Beaver, J., and Benford, S. 2003. Ambiguity as a resource for design. In Proceedings of CHI’03. ACM, New York, 233--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Gustafsson, A. and Gyllenswärd, M. 2005. The poweraware cord: Energy awareness through ambient information display. In Proceedings of the CHI EA’05. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Gustafsson, A., Katzeff, C., and Bång, M. 2009. Evaluation of a pervasive game for domestic energy engagement among teenagers. In Proceedings of Computers in Entertainment (CIE). ACM, 4, 54:1--54--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Hargreaves, T. 2011. Practicing behavior change: Applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behavior change. J. Consum. Cult. 11, 1, 79--99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Jönsson, L., Broms, L., and Katzeff, C. 2010. Watt-lite: Energy statistics made tangible. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS). ACM, 240--243. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Katzeff, C., Nyblom, Å., Tunheden, S., and Torstensson, C., 2011. User centred design and evaluation of EnergyCoach -- An interactive energy service for households. Behav. Inf. Tech. Taylor & Frances Group, 1--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Klemmer, S. R., Hartmann, B., and Takayama, L. 2006. How bodies matter: Five themes for interaction design. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS). ACM, 140--149. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Kripendorff, K. 1995. On the essential context of artifacts or on the proposition that “Design is making sense (of things). In The Meaning of Products, P. Dormer Ed., Thames & Hudson, UK, 156--184.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Lindén, A.-L. and Carlsson-Kanyama, A. 2002. Voluntary agreements - A measure for energy efficiency in industries? Lessons from a Swedish programme. Energy Policy 10, 897--905.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Marshall, P., Price, S., and Rogers, Y. 2003. Conceptualising tangibles to support learning. In Proceedings of Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC’03). 101--109. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Mazé, R. and Redström, J. 2007. Difficult forms: Critical practices in design and research. In Proceedings of the IASDR07 Conference on Emerging Trends in Design Research. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Mazé, R. and Redström, J. 2008. Switch! Energy ecologies in everyday life. Int. J. Des.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Papanek, V. 1995. The Green Imperative; Ecology and Ethics in Design and Architecture. Thames & Hudson, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Pierce, J. and Paulos, E. 2012. Beyond energy monitors: Interaction, energy, and emerging energy systems. In Proceedings of CHI’12. ACM, New York, 665--674. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Preda, A. 1999. The turn to things: Arguments for a sociological theory of things. Sociolo. Quart., 40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Schwartz, T., Betz, M., Ramirez, L., and Stevens, G. 2010. Sustainable energy practices at work: Understanding the role of workers in energy conservation. In Proceedings of NordiCHI 2010 (Reykjavik, Iceland, Oct. 16--20). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Seligman, C., Darley, J. M., and Becker, L. J. 1978. Behavioral approaches to residential energy conservation. In Saving Energy in the Home. Princeton’s Experiments at Twin River, R. S. Socolow Ed., Ballinger Publishing Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Simon, J., Jahn, M., and Al-akkad, A. 2012. Saving energy at work: The design of a pervasive game for office spaces. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM’12). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Spagnolli, A., Corradi, N., Gamberini, L., Hoggan, E., Jacucci, G., Katzeff, C., Broms, L., and Jönsson, L. 2011. Eco-feedback on the go: Motivating energy awareness. Computer, 38--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Trygg, L. 2006. Swedish industrial and energy supply measures in a European system perspective. Linköping Studies in Science & Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Yun, T.-J. 2009. Investigating the impact of a minimalist in-home energy consumption display. In Proceedings of CHI’09, Spotlight on Work in Progress. ACM, 4418--4422. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Exploring Sustainable Practices in Workplace Settings through Visualizing Electricity Consumption

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
      ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction  Volume 20, Issue 5
      November 2013
      129 pages
      ISSN:1073-0516
      EISSN:1557-7325
      DOI:10.1145/2533682
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 November 2013
      • Revised: 1 June 2013
      • Accepted: 1 June 2013
      • Received: 1 August 2012
      Published in tochi Volume 20, Issue 5

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader