skip to main content
10.1145/2502081.2502121acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Facilitating fashion camouflage art

Published:21 October 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Artists and fashion designers have recently been creating a new form of art -- Camouflage Art -- which can be used to prevent computer vision algorithms from detecting faces. This digital art technique combines makeup and hair styling, or other modifications such as facial painting to help avoid automatic face-detection. In this paper, we first study the camouflage interference and its effectiveness on several current state of art techniques in face detection/recognition; and then present a tool that can facilitate digital art design for such camouflage that can fool these computer vision algorithms. This tool can find the prominent or decisive features from facial images that constitute the face being recognized; and give suggestions for camouflage options (makeup, styling, paints) on particular facial features or facial parts. Testing of this tool shows that it can effectively aid the artists or designers in creating camouflage-thwarting designs. The evaluation on suggested camouflages applied on 40 celebrities across eight different face recognition systems (both non-commercial or commercial) shows that 82.5% ~ 100% of times the subject is unrecognizable using the suggested camouflage.

References

  1. Harvey, A. 2010. CV Dazzle: Camouflage from Computer Vision. Available at: http://cvdazzle.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Viola, P., and Jones, M. J. 2004. Robust Real-Time Face Detection. Int. J. Comput. Vision57, 2 (May 2004), 137--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Sky Biometry. Available at: http://www.skybiometry.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ramanathan, N., Chowdhury, A., and Chellappa, R. 2004. Facial similarity across age, disguise, illumination and pose, in Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing, 3, 1999--2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Singh, R., Vatsa, M., and Noore A., 2009. Face recognition with disguise and single gallery images. Image and Vision Computing, 27, 3, 245--257. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Phillips, J., Todd Scruggs, W., O'Toole, A.J., Flynn, P. J., Bowyer, K.W., Schott, C.L., and Sharpe, M. 2007. FRVT 2006 and ICE 2006 Large-Scale Results. NISTIR 7408.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. DIS Magazine, 2013. How to Hide from Machines. Available at: http://dismagazine.com/dystopia/evolved-lifestyles/8115/anti-surveillance-how-to-hide-frommachines/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis, G., and Hall, M. 2012. The Makeup Artist Handbook: Techniques for Film, Television, Photography, and Theatre. Taylor & Francis US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Luckiesh, M. 1922. Visual Illusion: Their Causes, Characteristics and Applications. D. Van Nostrand Company, New York.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Phan, M. 2012. Michelle Phan Tutorials. Available at: http://michellephan.com/blog/cat/tutorialsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Google+/Google Picasa Face Recognition. 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Baidu Face Search. 2013. Available at: http://stu.baidu.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Duda, R. O., Hart, P. E., and Stork, D. G. 2001. Pattern Classification, Wiley Interscience. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Sirovich, L., Kirby, M. 1987. Low-dimensional procedure for the characterization of human faces. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 4 (3): 519--524.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Belhumeur, P., Hespanha, J., and Kriegman, D. 1997. Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: Recognition Using Class Specific Linear Projection, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 19(7):711--720. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Brunelli, R., and Poggio, T. 1993. "Face Recognition: Features vs. Templates," IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 15(10): 1042--1053. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kanade, T. 1973. Picture Processing System by Computer Complex and Recognition of Human Faces. doctoral dissertation, Kyoto University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Brunelli, R., Poggio, T. 1993. Face recognition: features versus templates, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 15(10): 1042--1052. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Edwards, G. J., Cootes, T. F., Taylor, C. J. 1998. Face Recognition using Acitive Appearance Models. In Proceedings of 5th European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV '98), 2: 581--595. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Cox, I.J., Ghosn, J., and Yianilos, P.N. 1996. Feature-based face recognition using mixture-distance. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR '96), 209--216. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Wiskott, L., Fellous, J.-M., Kruger, N., and Von der Malsburg, C. 1997. Face recognition by elastic bunch graph matching. International Conference on Image Processing, 1:129--132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Craw, I., Tock, D., and Bennett, A. 1992. Finding Face Features. In Proceedings of 2nd European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV '92), Springer-Verlag, London, UK, 92--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Ahonen, T., Hadid, A., and Pietikainen, M. 2006. Face Description with Local Binary Patterns: Application to Face Recognition, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 28(12): 2037--2041. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Liu, C., and Wechsler, H. 2003. Independent component analysis of Gabor features for face recognition, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 14(4): 919--928. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Anderson, I. 2008. 1940s Hairstyle Book by Anderson (Vintage Hairstyling). Bramcost Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Animal Painted on Lips. 2011. Available at: http://toxel.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. PicTriev. 2013. Available at: http://www.pictriev.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Chiang, P., Liao, W., Li, T. 2004. Automatic Caricature Generation by Analyzing Facial Features, in Proceeding of 2004 Asia Conference on Computer Vision (ACCV2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Cootes, T.F., Edwards, G.J,; and Taylor, C.J., Active appearance models, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 23(6): 681--685. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Milborrow, S., Morkel, J., and Nicolls, F. 2010. The MUCT Landmarked Face Database, Pattern Recognition Association of South Africa.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Facilitating fashion camouflage art

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MM '13: Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Multimedia
      October 2013
      1166 pages
      ISBN:9781450324045
      DOI:10.1145/2502081

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 October 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      MM '13 Paper Acceptance Rate47of235submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate995of4,171submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      MM '24
      MM '24: The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
      October 28 - November 1, 2024
      Melbourne , VIC , Australia

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader