skip to main content
10.1145/2502081.2502126acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

"Wow! you are so beautiful today!"

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 October 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Beauty e-Experts, a fully automatic system for hairstyle and facial makeup recommendation and synthesis, is developed in this work. Given a user-provided frontal face image with short/bound hair and no/light makeup, the Beauty e-Experts system can not only recommend the most suitable hairdo and makeup, but also show the synthetic effects. To obtain enough knowledge for beauty modeling, we build the Beauty e-Experts Database, which contains 1,505 attractive female photos with a variety of beauty attributes and beauty-related attributes annotated. Based on this Beauty e-Experts Dataset, two problems are considered for the Beauty e-Experts system: what to recommend and how to wear, which describe a similar process of selecting hairstyle and cosmetics in our daily life. For the what-to-recommend problem, we propose a multiple tree-structured super-graphs model to explore the complex relationships among the high-level beauty attributes, mid-level beauty-related attributes and low-level image features, and then based on this model, the most compatible beauty attributes for a given facial image can be efficiently inferred. For the how-to-wear problem, an effective and efficient facial image synthesis module is designed to seamlessly synthesize the recommended hairstyle and makeup into the user facial image. Extensive experimental evaluations and analysis on testing images of various conditions well demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed system.

References

  1. T. Ahonen, A. Hadid, and M. Pietikainen. Face description with local binary patterns: application to face recognition. TPAMI, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. S. Belongie, J. Malik, and J. Puzicha. Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts. TPAMI, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. F. Bookstein. Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. TPAMI, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Y. Boykov and O. Veksler. Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts. TPAMI, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. C. Chang and C. Lin. Libsvm: A library for support vector machines. In TIST, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. F. Chen and D. Zhang. A benchmark for geometric facial beauty study. In Int. Conf. Medical Biometrics, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. C. Chow and C. Liu. Approximating discrete probability distributions with dependence trees. TIT, 1968. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. T. Cootes, C. Taylor, D. Cooper, and J. Graham. Active shape models-their training and application. CVIU, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. Criminisi, P. Perez, and K. Toyama. Region filling and object removal by exemplar-based image inpainting. TIP, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. N. Dalal and B. Triggs. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In CVPR, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. de Berg, O. Cheong, M. van Kreveld, and M. Overmars. Computational Geometry: Algorithms and Applications. Springer-Verlag, third edition, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. P. Felzenszwalb, R. Girshick, D. McAllester, and D. Ramanan. Object detection with discriminatively trained part-based models. TPAMI, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. R. Feris and L. Davis. Image ranking and retrieval based on multi-attribute queries. In CVPR, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. A. Goshtasby. Piecewise linear mapping functions for image registration. PR, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. D. Guo and T. Sim. Digital face makeup by example. In CVPR, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. S. Haykin. Neural Networks. Prentice Hall, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. K. He, J. Sun, and X. Tang. Guided image filtering. In ECCV, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. G. Huang, M. Ramesh, T. Berg, and E. Learned. Labeled faces in the wild: A database for studying face recognition in unconstrained environments. Technical report, University of Massachusetts, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. T. Joachims. Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data. In ACM KDD, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. I. Jolliffe. Principal component analysis. Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. D. Koller and N. Friedman. Probabilistic Graphical Models: Principles and Techniques. MIT Press, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. A. Levin, D. Lischinski, and Y. Weiss. A closed-form solution to natural image matting. TPAMI, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. S. Liu, J. Feng, Z. Song, T. Zhang, H. Lu, C. Xu, and S. Yan. "Hi, magic closet, tell me what to wear". In ACM MM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. T. Mensink, J. Verbeek, and G. Csurka. Tree-structured crf models for interactive image labeling. TPAMI, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Y. Nagai, K. Ushiro, Y. Matsunami, T. Hashimoto, and Y. Kojima. Hairstyle suggesting system, hairstyle suggesting method, and computer program product. US Patent US20050251463 A1, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. C. Rother, V. Kolmogorov, and A. Blake. Grabcut: Interactive foreground extraction using iterated graph cuts. TOG, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. K. Scherbaum, T. Ritschel, M. Hullin, T. Thormahlen, V. Blanz, and H. Seidel. Computer-suggested facial makeup. CGF, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. W. Tong, C. Tang, M. Brown, and Y. Xu. Example-based cosmetic transfer. In FG, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. N. Wang, H. Ai, and F. Tang. What are good parts for hair shape modeling? In CVPR, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Y. Wang and G. Mori. A discriminative latent model of object classes and attributes. In ECCV, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Y. Yang and D. Ramanan. Articulated pose estimation with exible mixtures-of-parts. In CVPR, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. "Wow! you are so beautiful today!"

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        MM '13: Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Multimedia
        October 2013
        1166 pages
        ISBN:9781450324045
        DOI:10.1145/2502081

        Copyright © 2013 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 21 October 2013

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        MM '13 Paper Acceptance Rate47of235submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate995of4,171submissions,24%

        Upcoming Conference

        MM '24
        MM '24: The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
        October 28 - November 1, 2024
        Melbourne , VIC , Australia

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader