skip to main content
10.1145/2505515.2507822acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Random walk-based graphical sampling in unbalanced heterogeneous bipartite social graphs

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 October 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

We investigate sampling techniques in unbalanced heterogeneous bipartite graphs (UHBGs), which have wide applications in real world web-scale social networks. We propose random walked-based link sampling and stratified sampling for UHBGs and show that they have advantages over generic random walk samplers. In addition, each sampler's node degree distribution parameter estimator statistic is analytically derived to be used as a quality indicator. In the experiments, we apply the two sampling techniques, with a baseline node sampling method, to both synthetic and real Facebook data. The experimental results show that random walk-based stratified sampler has significant advantage over node sampler and link sampler on UHBGs.

References

  1. M. Gjoka, M. Kurant, C. Butts, and A. Markopoulou. Walking in facebook: A case study of unbiased sampling of osns. In INFOCOM, March 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. Leskovec and C. Faloutsos. Sampling from large graphs. KDD '06, pages 631--636. ACM, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. L. Liu, J. Tang, J. Han, and S. Yang. Learning influence from heterogeneous social networks. Data Min. Knowl. Discov., 25(3):511--544, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. L. Lovasz. Random walks on graphs: A survey, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 21(6):1087--1092, 1953.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. M. E. J. Newman, S. H. Strogatz, and D. J. Watts. Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications. Phys. Rev. E, 64:026118, Jul 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. M. E. J. Newman, D. J. Watts, and S. H. Strogatz. Random graph models of social networks. PNAS, 99(Suppl 1):2566--2572, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Y. Xie, Z. Chen, K. Zhang, Y. Cheng, A. Agrawal, W. keng Liao, and A. Choudhary. Detecting and tracking disease outbreaks in real-time through social media. In IJCAI, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. K. Zhang, Z. Chen, Y. Cheng, Y. Xie, D. Downey, A. Agrawal, W. keng Liao, and A. Choudhary. A probabilistic graphical model for brand reputation assessment in social networks. In ASONAM '13, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Random walk-based graphical sampling in unbalanced heterogeneous bipartite social graphs

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CIKM '13: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management
      October 2013
      2612 pages
      ISBN:9781450322638
      DOI:10.1145/2505515

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 October 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      CIKM '13 Paper Acceptance Rate143of848submissions,17%Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader