skip to main content
10.1145/2506095.2506132acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesairConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Detection of target gases and optimal selection of SAW sensors for E-Nose applications

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 July 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Detection of hazardous gases has several commercial and industrial applications. Surface Acoustic Wave(SAW) sensors can provide chemical signatures of gases. A set of SAW sensors in conjunction with a suitably trained pattern recognition engine can work as an Electronic Nose(E-Nose) for a set of gases. For the best performance, the sensors used in the nose must have optimal responses to all the target gases. We first present a method for target gas detection from the sensed data and subsequently describe two novel candidate algorithms used for selection of a subset of sensors from a given set of sensors for an electronic nose.

References

  1. B. E. Boser, I. M. Guyon, and V. N. Vapnik. A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. In Proceedings of the fifth annual workshop on Computational learning theory, pages 144--152. ACM, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. C. J. Burges. A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data mining and knowledge discovery, 2(2):121--167, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. O. Canhoto and N. Magan. Electronic nose technology for the detection of microbial and chemical contamination of potable water. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 106(1):3--6, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. C.-C. Chang and C.-J. Lin. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2:27:1--27:27, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. K.-B. Duan and S. Keerthi. Which is the best multiclass svm method? an empirical study. Multiple Classifier Systems, pages 732--760, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. R. Dutta, K. Kashwan, M. Bhuyan, E. Hines, and J. Gardner. Electronic nose based tea quality standardization. Neural Networks, 16(5):847--853, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. D. James, S. Scott, Z. Ali, and W. OÂąÂŕhare. Chemical sensors for electronic nose systems. Microchimica Acta, 149(1):1--17, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. S. Jha and R. Yadava. Development of surface accoustic wave electronic nose using pattern recognition system. Defence Science Journal, 60(4):364--374, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. G. L. J. K Arshak, E. Moore and S. Clifford. A review of gas sensors employed in electronic nose applications. Sensors Review, 24(2):181--198, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. S. Martin, G. Frye, and S. Senturia. Dynamics and response of polymer-coated surface acoustic wave devices: effect of viscoelastic properties and film resonance. Analytical Chemistry, 66(14):2201--2219, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. H. T. Nagle, R. Gutierrez-Osuna, and S. S. Schiffman. The how and why of electronic noses. Spectrum, IEEE, 35(9):22--31, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. A. Nimal, U. Mittal, M. Singh, M. Khaneja, G. Kannan, J. Kapoor, V. Dubey, P. Gutch, G. Lal, K. Vyas, and D. Gupta. Development of handheld saw vapor sensors for explosives and cw agents. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 135(2):399--410, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. E. W. d. R. R.E. Baby, M. Cabezas. Electronic nose: a useful tool for monitoring environmental contamination. Sensors and Actuators B, 149(1):1--17, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. V. Vapnik. The nature of statistical learning theory. springer, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. H. Zhang and J. Wang. Detection of age and insect damage incurred by wheat, with an electronic nose. Journal of Stored Products Research, 43(4):489--495, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Detection of target gases and optimal selection of SAW sensors for E-Nose applications

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      AIR '13: Proceedings of Conference on Advances In Robotics
      July 2013
      366 pages
      ISBN:9781450323475
      DOI:10.1145/2506095

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 July 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate69of140submissions,49%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader