ABSTRACT
This paper examines the use of touchscreen smartphones, focusing on physical access. Using interviews and observations, we found that participants with dexterity impairment considered a smartphone both useful and usable, but tablet devices offer several important advantages. Cost is a major barrier to adoption. We describe usability problems that are not addressed by existing accessibility options, and observe that the dexterity demands of important accessibility features made them unusable for many participants. Despite participants' enthusiasm for both smartphones and tablet devices, their potential is not yet fully realized for this population.
- Anthony, L., Kim, Y., Findlater, L. 2013. Analyzing user-generated YouTube videos to understand touchscreen use by people with motor impairments. In Proceedings of CHI 2013, 1223--1232. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Comscore. 2013. Mobile Future in Focus 2013. Retrieved April 18, 2013, from Comscore: http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Presentations_and_Whitepapers/2013/2013_Mobile_Future_in_Focus.Google Scholar
- Condado, A., Godinho, R., Zacaries, M., and Lobo, F. 2011. EasyWrite: A touch-based entry method for mobile devices. In Proc. INTERACT 2011 Workshop on Mobile Accessibility (MOBACC 2011), Lisbon, Portugal, 1--8.Google Scholar
- Davis, F. and Venkatesh, V. 1996. A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments. Int. Journal of Human-Computer Studies 45, 19--45. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ericsson. 2012. Ericsson Mobility Report on the Pulse of the Networked Society. Retrieved April, 2013, from Ericsson: http://www.ericsson.com/res/docs/2012/ericsson-mobility-report-november-2012.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Froehlich, J., Wobbrock, J. O., and Kane, S. K. 2007. Barrier pointing: using physical edges to assist target acquisition on mobile device touch screens. In Proc. 9th Int. ACM SIGACCESS Conf. on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 19--26. DOI=10.1145/1296843.1296849. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hager, E. IPad opens world to a disabled boy, New York Times, 2010. Retrieved April, 2013, from http://66.77.252.5/content/files/iPad_opens_world_to_disabled_boy.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Kane, S. K., Jayant, C., Wobbrock, J. O., and Ladner, R. E. 2009. Freedom to roam: a study of mobile device adoption and accessibility for people with visual and motor disabilities. In Proc. 11th Int. ACM SIGACCESS Conf. on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 115--122. DOI=10.1145/1639642.1639663. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Krigger, K. 2006. Cerebral Palsy: An overview. American Family Physician 73(1), American Academy of Family Physicians, 91--100. Retrieved May 2013 at www.aafp.org/afp.Google Scholar
- Kurniawan, S. 2008. Older people and mobile phones: A multi-method investigation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66 (12), 889--901. Google ScholarDigital Library
- National Council on Disability. 2013. Medicaid Managed Care for People with Disabilities: Policy and Implementation Considerations for State and Federal Policymakers. Retrieved on April 16, 2013 from http://www.ncd.gov/publications/2013/20130315/.Google Scholar
- Nicolau, H., and Jorge, J. 2012. Elderly text-entry performance on touchscreens. In Proc. 14th Int. ACM SIGACCESS Conf. on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 127--134. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Odding, E., Roebroeck, M. and Stam, H. 2006. The epidemiology of cerebral palsy: Incidence, impairments and risk factors. Disability and Rehabilitation 28(4), 183--191.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sesto, M. E., Irwin, C. B., Chen, K. B., Chourasia, A. O. and Wiegmann, D. A. 2012. Effect of Touch Screen Button Size and Spacing on Touch Characteristics of Users With and Without Disabilities Human Factors. The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2012 54: 425.Google Scholar
- Trewin, S., Keates, S., and Moffatt, K. 2007. Individual responses to a method of cursor assistance. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 3(1-2), 2--21, Informa UK Ltd UK, 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wacharamanotham, C., Hurtmanns, J., Mertens, A., Kronenbuerger, M., Schlick, C., and Borchers, J. 2011. Evaluating swabbing: a touchscreen input method for elderly users with tremor. In Proceedings of CHI 2011, 623--626. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wobbrock, J. O., Myers, B. A., and Kembel, J. A. 2003. EdgeWrite: a stylus-based text entry method designed for high accuracy and stability of motion. In Proc. 16th annual ACM Symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST '03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 61--7 Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Physical accessibility of touchscreen smartphones
Recommendations
Freedom to roam: a study of mobile device adoption and accessibility for people with visual and motor disabilities
Assets '09: Proceedings of the 11th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibilityMobile devices provide people with disabilities new opportunities to act independently in the world. However, these empowering devices have their own accessibility challenges. We present a formative study that examines how people with visual and motor ...
PersonalTouch: Improving Touchscreen Usability by Personalizing Accessibility Settings based on Individual User's Touchscreen Interaction
CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsModern touchscreen devices have recently introduced customizable touchscreen settings to improve accessibility for users with motor impairments. For example, iOS 10 introduced the following four Touch Accommodation settings: 1) Hold Duration, 2) Ignore ...
Investigating touchscreen accessibility for people with visual impairments
NordiCHI '08: Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: building bridgesTouchscreen computing devices such as the iPhone are becoming more common. However this technology is largely inaccessible to people with visual impairments. We present the results of a requirements capture study that illustrates the problems with ...
Comments