research-article

Factor-based parent plan support system

Authors:

Michał Araszkiewicz,

Agata Łopatkiewicz,

Adam ZienkiewiczAuthors Info & Claims

ICAIL '13: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law

Pages 171 - 175

https://doi.org/10.1145/2514601.2514621

Published: 10 June 2013 Publication History

Abstract

A factor-based approach to case-based reasoning has been successfully applied in the field of AI and Law to model legal arguments in adversarial judicial procedures. In this paper, we discuss how factors and dimensions can be applied in a dispute-support system that aims to reconcile inconsistent interests of the parties for the sake of a higher-order value, that is, the well being of a child.

References

[1]

Aleven, V. 1997. Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pittsburgh Graduate Program in Intelligent Systems.

Digital Library

[2]

Alexy, R. 2002. A theory of constitutional rights. (J. Rivers, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[3]

Ashley, K. D. 1990. Modeling legal argument: Reasoning with cases and hypotheticals. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Digital Library

[4]

Bench-Capon, T. J. M., & Prakken, H. 2010. A lightweight formal model of two-phase democratic deliberation. R. Winkels (Ed.). Legal Knowledge and Information Systems JURIX 2010: The 23^rd Annual Conference. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 27--36.

Digital Library

[5]

Bench-Capon, T. J. M., Prakken, H., & Visser, W. 2011. Argument schemes for two-phase democratic deliberation. K. Ashley, & T. van Engers (Eds.). Proceedings of ICAIL 2011. New York: ACM Press, 21--30.

Digital Library

[6]

Bellucci E., & Zeleznikow J. 2005. Developing negotiation decision support system that supports mediators. A case of the Family_Winner system. Artificial Intelligence and Law 13, 233--271.

Digital Library

[7]

Ehrgott, M. 2005. Multicriteria optimization. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

Digital Library

[8]

Folberg, J., Golann, D., Kloppenberg, L., & Stipanowich, T. 2005, Resolving disputes: Theory, practice, and law. New York: Aspen Publishers.

[9]

Grabmair, M., & Ashley, K. D. 2010. Argumentation with value judgments -- An example of hypothetical reasoning. R. Winkels (Ed.) Legal Knowledge and Information Systems JURIX 2010: The 23^rd Annual Conference. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 67--76.

Digital Library

[10]

Grabmair, M., & Ashley, K. D. 2011. Facilitating case comparison using value judgments and intermediate legal concepts. K. Ashley, & T. van Engers (Eds.). Proceedings of ICAIL 2011. New York: ACM Press, 161--170.

Digital Library

[11]

Hage, J. C. 2005. Studies in legal logic. Berlin: Springer.

[12]

Ladd, P. D. 2005. Mediation, conciliation, and emotions: A practitioner's guide for understanding emotions in dispute resolution. Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America, Inc.

[13]

Lodder, A., & Zeleznikow, J. 2005. Developing an online dispute resolution environment: Dialogue tools and negotiation support systems in a three-step model. Harvard Negotiation Law Review 10, 287--337.

[14]

Lynch, C., Ashley, K. D., Pinkwart, N., & Aleven V. 2009. Concepts, structures and goals: Redefining ill-definedness. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 19, 253--266.

Digital Library

[15]

Prakken, H., & Sartor, G. 1998. Modeling reasoning with precedents in a formal dialogue game. Artificial Intelligence and Law 6, 231--287.

Digital Library

[16]

Rau, A., Sherman, E., & Peppet, S. 2002. Processes of dispute resolution: The role of lawyers. (3^rd ed.). New York: Foundation Press.

[17]

Riskin, L., Westbrook, J., Guthrie, C., Heinsz, T. J., Reuben, R. C, & Robbennolt, J. K. 2006. Dispute resolution and lawyers (Abridged). (3^rd ed.). Saint Paul: Thomson West.

[18]

Sartor, G. 2010. Doing justice to rights and values: Teleological reasoning and proportionality. Artificial Intelligence and Law 18, 175--215.

Digital Library

[19]

Zeleznikow, J. Stranieri, & A. Gawler, M. 1996. Project report: Split-Up: A legal expert system which determines property division after divorce. Artificial Intelligence and Law 3, 267--275.

Digital Library

Cited By

Araszkiewicz MŁopatkiewicz AZienkiewicz AZurek T(2015)Framing a Knowledge Base for a Legal Expert System Dealing with Indeterminate ConceptsThe Scientific World Journal10.1155/2015/9854252015:1Online publication date: Oct-2015
https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/985425
Araszkiewicz MŁopatkiewicz AZienkiewicz AZurek TSichelman TAtkinson K(2015)Representation of an actual divorce dispute in the parenting plan support systemProceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law10.1145/2746090.2746119(166-170)Online publication date: 8-Jun-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2746090.2746119
Al-Abdulkarim LAtkinson KBench-Capon TSichelman TAtkinson K(2015)Factors, issues and valuesProceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law10.1145/2746090.2746103(3-12)Online publication date: 8-Jun-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2746090.2746103

Recommendations

Representation of an actual divorce dispute in the parenting plan support system
ICAIL '15: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law

This paper evaluates the Parenting Plan Support System, a partially implemented decision support system designed to help parents to draft an agreement concerning relations with their children after the divorce, against the background of a real-life ...
Supporting parent-child communication in divorced families

Divorce affects a significant number of children and parents worldwide. We interviewed 10 parents and five children to get a qualitative understanding of the challenges faced by these families and the role of technology in maintaining contact. We found ...
Parent and child problematic media use: The role of maternal postpartum depression and dysfunctional parent-child interactions in young children
Abstract
Problematic media use, or media use that interferes with daily functioning, is most often studied in adolescent or young adult age groups. Less research has examined problematic media use within the family system, among parents and ...
Highlights
- Problematic media use is seen in children as young as 3–4 years old and in their parents.

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

ICAIL '13: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law

June 2013

277 pages

ISBN:9781450320801

DOI:10.1145/2514601

Conference Chair:
Enrico Francesconi
Institute of Legal Information Theory and Techniques - ITTIG-CNR Florence, Italy
,
Program Chair:
Bart Verheij
Institute of Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Engineering, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Copyright © 2013 Authors.

Sponsors

ITTIG-CNR: Istituto di Teoria e Tecniche dell'Informazione Giuridica - Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
IAAIL: Intl Asso for Artifical Intel & Law

In-Cooperation

SIGAI: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 10 June 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

Narodowe Centrum Nauki

Conference

ICAIL '13

Sponsor:

ITTIG-CNR
IAAIL

ICAIL '13: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law

June 10 - 14, 2013

Rome, Italy

Acceptance Rates

ICAIL '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 17 of 53 submissions, 32%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 69 of 169 submissions, 41%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

3
Total Citations
View Citations
87
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)4
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Araszkiewicz MŁopatkiewicz AZienkiewicz AZurek T(2015)Framing a Knowledge Base for a Legal Expert System Dealing with Indeterminate ConceptsThe Scientific World Journal10.1155/2015/9854252015:1Online publication date: Oct-2015
https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/985425
Araszkiewicz MŁopatkiewicz AZienkiewicz AZurek TSichelman TAtkinson K(2015)Representation of an actual divorce dispute in the parenting plan support systemProceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law10.1145/2746090.2746119(166-170)Online publication date: 8-Jun-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2746090.2746119
Al-Abdulkarim LAtkinson KBench-Capon TSichelman TAtkinson K(2015)Factors, issues and valuesProceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law10.1145/2746090.2746103(3-12)Online publication date: 8-Jun-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2746090.2746103
Зенкевич АZienkiewicz A(2014)Amicable Dispute Resolution: a comparison of the Polish and Russian legal perspectiveComparative Research In Law and Politics10.12737/52502:1(61-67)Online publication date: 15-Jun-2014
https://doi.org/10.12737/5250

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten