skip to main content
10.1145/2516604.2516619acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesictdConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The impact of public access to ICTs: findings from a five-year, eight-country study

Published:07 December 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

This article summarizes the findings of a five-year study investigating the impacts of public access to information and communication technologies (ICTs). The research was conducted in eight low and medium income countries employing a range of survey, ethnographic, and experimental research approaches. The analysis revealed substantial first-order effects in terms of technology access, information access and ICT skills development. Second-order effects in domains such as health, education, employment and income varied considerably, though when public access users had a need in any of these areas they were generally successful in achieving their goals. The study also found significant impacts among non-users, a group that includes former users, a largely unexplored dimension of public access. These findings challenge a commonly held notion that public access is solely a stepping stone to private access.

References

  1. Alampay, E., Alampay, L., and Raza, K. 2013. The impact of cybercafés on the connectedness of children left behind by overseas Filipino workers. Global Impact Study Research Report Series. Seattle: Technology & Social Change Group, University of Washington Information SchoolGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Amariles, F., Paz, O. P., Russell, N., & Johnson, N. (2006). The Impacts of Community Telecenters in Rural Colombia. Journal of Community Informatics, 2(3).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashraf, M., Hanisch, J. & Swatman, P. (2009). ICT intervention in the 'Chandanbari' Village of Bangladesh: Results from a field study. Information Systems Frontiers, 11 (2): 155--166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bell, T. (2006). Village computing: A State of the Field. Reflections on the Village Computing Consultation. Grameen Foundation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Best, M. L., Garg, S., Kollanyi, B., and Fellows, M. 2013. Understanding and rethinking shared access: How people collaborate and share knowledge and technologies in Ghanaian cybercafés. Global Impact Study Research Report Series. Seattle: Technology & Social Change Group, University of Washington Information School.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Best, M., Kolko, B., Thakur, D., & Aitieva, M. (2007). Assessment of Economic Growth Impacts of the eCenters Project in Kyrgyzstan. AEDGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Blattman, C., Jensen, R., Roman, R. (2002). Assessing the Need and Potential of Community Networking for Development in Rural India. The Information Society: An International Journal, 19(5).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowman, N. A. (2010). Can 1st-year college students accurately report their learning and development? Academic Educational Research Journal, 47(2), 466--496.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Business Daily (July 21, 2013). Mobile phones put the future of cybercafés at risk. Retrieved August 22, 2013 at http://www.businessdailyafrica.com/Mobile+phones+put+the+future+of+cybercaf+s+business+at+risk/-/539546/1921904/-/8888j6/-/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Crockett, L. J., Schulenberg, J. E., and Petersen, A. C. (1987). Congruence between objective and self-report data in a sample of young adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 2(4), 383--392.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Davis, T. Forthcoming 2013. Perceptions of Value for Public Access to Information and Communication Technology in Five Countries: A Mixed Method Benefit-Cost Analysis Approach for Informing Policy. Global Impact Study Research Report Series. Seattle: Technology & Social Change Group, University of Washington Information SchoolGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Haseloff, Anikar M. (2005). Cybercafes and their Potential as Community Development Tools in India. The Journal of Community Informatics, 1(3).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Hedberg, Linda Johansson (2010). Telecentre for Community Development: Evaluation of the Tunjang Telecentre, Malaysia. The Journal of Community Informatics 6(2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Heeks, Richard and Kanashiro, Laura León (2009). Telecentres in mountain regions --- A Peruvian case study of the impact of information and communication technologies on remoteness and exclusion. Journal of Mountain Science, 6 (4): 320--330.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Junco, R. (2013). Comparing actual and self-reported measures of Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 626--613. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kleine, Dorothea (2011). 'The men never say that they do not know': Telecentres as gendered spaces. In J. Steyn, et al (Eds), ICTs for Global Development and Sustainability: Practice and Applications (pp. 189--210). Hersey, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kolko, B., Racadio, R., Deibel, K., Krause, K., and Prempeh, J. Forthcoming 2013. The value of non-instrumental computer use: Skills acquisition, self-confidence, and community-based technology teaching. Global Impact Study Research Report Series. Seattle: Technology & Social Change Group, University of Washington Information SchoolGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kumar, Rajendra & Best, M. (2006). Social Impact and Diffusion of Telecenter Use: A Study from the Sustainable Access in Rural India Project. Journal of Community Informatics, 2 (3).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kumar, Richa. (2004). e-Choupals: A Study on the Financial Sustainability of Village Internet Centres in Rural Madhya Pradesh. ITID, 2(1), 29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kuriyan, R., & Toyama, K. (2007). Review of Research on Rural PC Kiosks. http://research.microsoft.com/research/tem/kiosks/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Oestmann, S., & Dymond, A. C. (2001). Telecentres --- Experiences, Lessons and Trends. VancouverGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Pal, J. (2009). If the State provided free computer literacy, would it find takers? Evidence and propositions from the Akshaya project in India. Information Systems Frontiers, 11 (2): 105--116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Parkinson, S., & Lauzon, A. (2008). The Impact of the Internet on Local Social Equity: A Study of a Telecenter in Aguablanca, Columbia. ITID, 4(3), 18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Peng, Yinni (2008). Internet Use of Migrant Workers in the Pearl River Delta. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 21(2): 47--54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Ramírez, R., Parthasarathy, B., and Gordon, A. Forthcoming 2013. Infomediaries: Brokers of public access. Global Impact Study Research Report Series. Seattle: Technology & Social Change Group, University of Washington Information SchoolGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Sciadas, G., with Lyons, H., Rothschild, C., & Sey, A. 2012. Public access to ICTs: Sculpting the profile of users. Seattle: Technology & Social Change Group, University of Washington Information SchoolGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Sen, A. (2000). Development as Freedom. NY: Random House Digital, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Sey, A., Coward, C., Bar, F., Rothschild, C., Koepke, L., & Sciadas, G. 2013. Connecting people for development: Why public access ICTs matter. Seattle: Technology & Social Change Group, University of Washington Information SchoolGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Sey, A. and Fellows, M. 2009. Literature review on the impact of public access to information and communication technologies. TASCHA Working Paper, No. 6. Seattle: Technology & Social Change Group, University of Washington Information SchoolGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Sheppard, K. (2001). The Remote Community Service Telecentres of Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. VancouverGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Simpson, L., Daws, L., Pini, B. (2004). Public Internet Access Revisited. Telecommunications Policy, 28(3--4)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Survey Working Group. 2012. Global Impact Study surveys: Methodologies and implementation. Seattle: Technology & Social Change Group, University of Washington Information SchoolGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Walton, M., and Donner, J. 2012. Public access, private phone: The interplay of shared access and the mobile internet for teenagers in Cape Town. Global Impact Study Research Report Series. Seattle: Technology & Social Change Group, University of Washington Information SchoolGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Yi-Chung, Hsu & Lih-Jiun Chuang, Ophelia (2008). Are Internet Caféés Gendered Spaces? CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(2): 224--226Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. The impact of public access to ICTs: findings from a five-year, eight-country study

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICTD '13: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development: Full Papers - Volume 1
        December 2013
        278 pages
        ISBN:9781450319065
        DOI:10.1145/2516604

        Copyright © 2013 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 December 2013

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate22of116submissions,19%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader