Abstract
Multiple scattering contributes critically to the characteristic translucent appearance of food, liquids, skin, and crystals; but little is known about how it is perceived by human observers. This article explores the perception of translucency by studying the image effects of variations in one factor of multiple scattering: the phase function. We consider an expanded space of phase functions created by linear combinations of Henyey-Greenstein and von Mises-Fisher lobes, and we study this physical parameter space using computational data analysis and psychophysics.
Our study identifies a two-dimensional embedding of the physical scattering parameters in a perceptually meaningful appearance space. Through our analysis of this space, we find uniform parameterizations of its two axes by analytical expressions of moments of the phase function, and provide an intuitive characterization of the visual effects that can be achieved at different parts of it. We show that our expansion of the space of phase functions enlarges the range of achievable translucent appearance compared to traditional single-parameter phase function models. Our findings highlight the important role phase function can have in controlling translucent appearance, and provide tools for manipulating its effect in material design applications.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
Supplemental movie, appendix, image and software files for, Understanding the role of phase function in translucent appearance
- Adelson, E. H. 2001. On seeing stuff: The perception of materials by humans and machines. In Proceedings of the SPIE Conference on Human Vision and Electronic Imaging.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud. 2013. http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/.Google Scholar
- Amazon Mechanical Turk. 2013. http://www.mturk.com/.Google Scholar
- Anderson, B. and Winawer, J. 2008. Layerd image representations and the computation of surface lightness. J. Vis. 8, 7.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Aydin, T. O., Cadik, M., Myszkowski, K., and Seidel, H. P. 2010. Video quality assessment for computer graphics applications. ACM Trans. Graph. 29, 6. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bonhams 1793 Limited. 2013. http://www.Bonhams.com/.Google Scholar
- Brainard, D. and Maloney, L. 2011. Surface color perception and equivalent illumination models. J. Vis. 11, 5.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Casella, G. and Berger, R. 2001. Statistical Inference. Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
- Chandrasekhar, S. 1960. Radiative Transfer. Dover.Google Scholar
- Cornette, W. and Shanks, J. 1992. Physically reasonable analytic expression for the single-scattering phase function. Appl. Optics 31, 16, 3152--3160.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cox, T. and Cox, M. 2000. Multidimensional Scaling. Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
- Cunningham, D., Wallraven, C., Fleming, R., and Straer, W. 2007. Perceptual reparameterization of material properties. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Aesthetics. Eurographics Association, 89--96. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Davis, J. V., Kulis, B., Jain, P., Sra, S., and Dhillon, I. S. 2007. Information-theoretic metric learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Debevec, P. 1998. Rendering synthetic objects into real scenes: Bridging traditional and image based graphics with global illumination and high dynamic range photography. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. ACM Press, New York, 189--198. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dryden, I. and Mardia, K. 1998. Statistical Shape Analysis. John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
- Fisher, R. 1953. Dispersion on a sphere. Proc. Royal Soc. London Math. Phys. Sci. A217, 1130, 295--305.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fleming, R., Dror, R., and Adelson, E. 2003. Real-world illumination and the perception of surface reflectance properties. J. Vis. 3, 5.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fleming, R. W. and Bulthoff, H. H. 2005. Low-level image cues in the perception of translucent materials. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 2, 3, 346--382. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fleming, R. W., Jensen, H. W., and Bulthoff, H. H. 2004. Perceiving translucent materials. In Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV'04). 127--134. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Frey, B. and Dueck, D. 2007. Clustering by passing messages between data points. Sci. 315, 5814, 972.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Frisvad, J., Christensen, N., and Jensen, H. 2007. Computing the scattering properties of participating media using lorenz-mie theory. ACM Trans. Graph 26, 3. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Goesele, M., Lensch, H. P. A., Lang, J., Fuchs, C., and Seidel, H.-P. 2004. DISCO: Acquisition of translucent objects. ACM Trans. Graph 23, 3, 835--844. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Han, C., Sun, B., Ramamoorthi, R., and Grinspun, E. 2007. Frequency domain normal map filtering. ACM Trans. Graph. 26, 3. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hara, K., Nishino, K., and Ikeuchi, K. 2008. Mixture of spherical distributions for single-view relighting. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 30, 1, 25--35. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Henyey, L. and Greenstein, J. 1941. Diffuse radiation in the galaxy. The Astrophys. J. 93, 70--83.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Irvin, W. 1965. Multiple scattering by large particles. The Astrophys. J. 142, 1563.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jakob, W. 2010. Mitsuba renderer. http://www.mitsuba-rendering.org.Google Scholar
- Jensen, H. 2001. Realistic Image Synthesis Using Photon Mapping. AK Peters, Ltd. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jensen, H. and Buhler, J. 2002. A rapid hierarchical rendering technique for translucent materials. ACM Trans. Graph. 21, 3. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jensen, H., Marschner, S., Levoy, M., and Hanrahan, P. 2001. A practical model for subsurface light transport. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. ACM Press, New York, 511--518. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kattawar, G. 1975. A three-parameter analytic phase function for multiple scattering calculations. J. Quant. Spectros. Radiat. Transfer 15, 9, 839--849.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kerr, W. B. and Pellacini, F. 2010. Toward evaluating material design interface paradigms for novice users. ACM Trans. Graph. 29, 4. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Khan, E., Reinhard, E., Fleming, R., and Bulthoff, H. 2006. Image-based material editing. ACM Trans. Graph. 25, 3, 654--663. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kim, J. and Anderson, B. 2010. Image statistics and the perception of surface gloss and lightness. J. Vis. 10, 9.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Koenderink, J. and van Doorn, A. 2001. Shading in the case of translucent objects. In Proceeding of the SPIE Conference on Human Vision and Electronic Imaging. Vol. 4299. 312.Google Scholar
- Krivanek, J., Ferwerda, J., and Bala, K. 2010. Effects of global illumination approximations on material appearance. ACM Trans. Graph. 29, 4. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mantiuk, R., Kim, K., Rempel, A., and Heidrich, W. 2011. HDR-vdp2: A calibrated visual metric for visibility and quality predictions in all luminance conditions. ACM Trans. Graph. 30, 4, 40. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marlow, P., Kim, J., and Anderson, B. 2011. The role of brightness and orientation congruence in the perception of surface gloss. J. Vis. 11, 9.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Metelli, F. 1974. The perception of transparency. Sci. Amer. 230, 90--98.Google Scholar
- Motoyoshi, I. 2010. Highlight-shading relationship as a cue for the perception of translucent and transparent materials. J. Vis. 10, 9.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Motoyoshi, I., Nishida, S., Sharan, L., and Adelson, E. 2007. Image statistics and the perception of surface qualities. Nature 447, 7141, 206.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mourant, J., Boyer, J., Hielscher, A., and Bigio, I. 1996. Influence of scattering phase function on light transport measurements in turbid media performed with small source-detector separations. Optics Lett. 21, 7, 546--548.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Myszkowski, K., Tawara, T., Akamine, H., and Seidel, H.-P. 2001. Perception-guided global illumination solution for animation rendering. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. 221--230. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Narasimhan, S., Gupta, M., Donner, C., Ramamoorthi, R., Nayar, S., and Jensen, H. 2006. Acquiring scattering properties of participating media by dilution. ACM Trans. Graph, 25, 1003--1012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ngan, A., Durand, F., and Matusik, W. 2006. Image-driven navigation of analytical brdf models. In Proceedings of the Eurographics Symposium on Rendering. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nishida, S. and Shinya, M. 1998. Use of image-based information in judgments of surface reflectance properties. J. Optics Soc. Amer. Image Sci. Vis. A15, 12, 2951--2965.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pellacini, F., Ferwerda, J. A., and Greenberg, D. P. 2000. Toward a psychophysically-based light reflection model for image synthesis. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. 55--64. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ramanarayanan, G., Ferwerda, J., Walter, B., and Bala, K. 2007. Visual equivalence: Towards a new standard for image fidelity. ACM Trans. Graph. 26, 3. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rosset, S. and Zhu, J. 2007. Peacewise linear regularized solution paths. The Ann. Statist. 35, 3, 1012--1030.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rushmeier, H., Rogowitz, B., and Piatko, C. 2000. Perceptual issues in substituting texture for geometry. In Proceedings of the SPIE Conference on Human Vision and Electronic Imaging. Vol. 3959. 372.Google Scholar
- Scholkopf, B. and Smola, A. 2001. Learning with Kernels. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Sharan, L., Li, Y., Motoyoshi, I., Nishida, S., and Adelson, E. 2008. Image statistics for surface reflectance perception. J. Optics Soc. Amer. Image Sci. Vis. A25, 4, 846--865.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Srebro, N., Rennie, J., and Jaakkola, T. 2005. Maximum-margin matrix factorization. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. MIT Press, 1329--1336.Google Scholar
- Stanford University Computer Graphics Laboratory. 2013. The stanford 3d scanning repository. http://graphics.stanford.edu/data/3Dscanrep/.Google Scholar
- Tamuz, O., Liu, C., Belongie, S., Shamir, O., and Kalai, A. 2011. Adaptively learning the crowd kernel. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning.Google Scholar
- Thompson, W., Fleming, R., Creem-Regehr, S., and Stefanucci, J. 2011. Visual Perception from a Computer Perspective. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Toh, K. and Yun, S. 2010. An accelerated proximal gradient algorithm for nuclear norm regularized linear leased squares problems. Pacific J. Optim. 6, 20, 615--640.Google Scholar
- van de Hulst, H. 1981. Light Scattering by Small Particles. Dover.Google Scholar
- Vangorp, P. and Dutré, P. 2008. Shape-dependent gloss correction. In Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization. 123--130. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vangorp, P., Laurijssen, J., and Dutré, P. 2007. The influence of shape on the perception of material reflectance. ACM Trans. Graph. 26, 3, 77. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Westlund, H. B. and Meyer, G. W. 2001. Applying appearance standards to light reflection models. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. 501--551. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wills, J., Agarwal, S., Kriegman, D., and Belongie, S. 2009. Toward a perceptual space for gloss. ACM Trans. Graph. 28, 4, 1--15. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wyman, D., Patterson, M., and Wilson, B. 1989. Similarity relations for the interaction parameters in radiation transport. Appl. Optics 28, 24, 5243--5249.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Xiao, B. and Brainard, D. 2008. Surface gloss and color perception of 3d objects. Vis. Neurosci. 25, 3, 371--385.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yaroslavsky, A., Yaroslavsky, I., Goldbach, T., and Schwarz-Maier, H. 1999. Influence of the scattering phase function approximation on the optical properties of blood determined from the integrating sphere measurements. J. Biomed. Optics 4, 47.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Understanding the role of phase function in translucent appearance
Recommendations
Low-Level Image Cues in the Perception of Translucent Materials
When light strikes a translucent material (such as wax, milk or fruit flesh), it enters the body of the object, scatters and reemerges from the surface. The diffusion of light through translucent materials gives them a characteristic visual softness and ...
All-frequency interactive relighting of translucent objects with single and multiple scattering
SIGGRAPH '05: ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 PapersWe present a technique, based on precomputed light transport, for interactive rendering of translucent objects under all-frequency environment maps. We consider the complete BSSRDF model proposed by Jensen et al. [2001]. which includes both single and ...
All-frequency interactive relighting of translucent objects with single and multiple scattering
We present a technique, based on precomputed light transport, for interactive rendering of translucent objects under all-frequency environment maps. We consider the complete BSSRDF model proposed by Jensen et al. [2001]. which includes both single and ...
Comments