skip to main content
10.1145/2517899.2517919acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesictdConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards operationalizing outlier detection in community health programs

Published:07 December 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Efficient health systems require reliable data. In developing countries the need for accurate data is particularly acute, as organizations are often forced to make decisions on a tight budget with limited capacity for data collection. In this note, we describe recent progress toward developing a set of algorithms that can help detect and classify anomalies in health worker data. Building on recent efforts to use unsupervised multinomial techniques for outlier detection, we outline the steps required to turn a set of statistical tests into a framework that can be implemented by health organizations, and calibrate these algorithms on a large dataset from a partner health organization. Here, we describe the core methods, present results from ongoing analyses, and outline our plan for future work, including plans to obtain labeled training data that will allow us to detect and classify different types of outlier in community health worker data.

References

  1. Birnbaum, B., DeRenzi, B., Flaxman, A. D., & Lesh, N. (2012, March). Automated quality control for mobile data collection. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Symposium on Computing for Development (p. 1). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Birnbaum, B., Borriello, G., Flaxman, A. D., DeRenzi, B., & Karlin, A. R. (2013, April). Using behavioral data to identify interviewer fabrication in surveys. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2911--2920). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. I. Schreiner et al. Interviewer falsification in census bureau surveys. ASA Section on Survey Research Methods, pages 491--496, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dell, N., Breit, N., Wobbrock, J. O., Borriello, G. 2013. Improving form-based data entry with image snippets. Proceedings of Graphics Interface (GI '13). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Patnaik, S., Brunskill, E., and Thies, W. 2009. Evaluating the accuracy of data collection on mobile phones: a study of forms, SMS, and voice. ICTD '09. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Chen, K., Chen, H., Conway, N., Hellerstein, J. M., & Parikh, T. S. (2011). Usher: Improving data quality with dynamic forms. Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 23(8), 1138--1153. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Chen, K., Kannan, A., Yano, Y., Hellerstein, J. M., & Parikh, T. S. (2012, March). Shreddr: pipelined paper digitization for low-resource organizations. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Symposium on Computing for Development (p. 3). ACM Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICTD '13: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information and Communications Technologies and Development: Notes - Volume 2
    December 2013
    214 pages
    ISBN:9781450319072
    DOI:10.1145/2517899

    Copyright © 2013 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 7 December 2013

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate22of116submissions,19%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader