skip to main content
10.1145/2522548.2522600acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescomputeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A comparative study of Monte Carlo methods to compute rare event probabilities of failure in reliability models

Published:22 August 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a comparative study of the performance of different Monte Carlo Simulation methods in the computation of rare event probabilities in Reliability Theory. We evaluate the performance of 4 well known Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods (MCMC), namely Metropolis-Hasting (MH), Hamiltonian or Hybrid Monte Carlo (HYBRID), Delayed Rejection and Adaptive Metropolis (DRAM), and Differential Evolution Adaptive Metropolis (DREAM), for computing the Probability of Failure using the Reliability Theory framework. We also compared the results of simulations with an approximate analytical method called First Order Reliability Method (FORM). The study shows that while both HYBRID and DREAM produce more accurate results, contrary to intuition, HYBRID method was very slow in performance.

References

  1. Faming Liang, Chuanhai Liu, and Raymond J. C. 2010. Advanced Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods: Learning from Past Samples, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Jasper A. Vrugt.,C. J. F. ter Braak., Diks C. G. H., and Bruce A. Robinson. 2009. "Accelerating Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation by Differential Evolution with Self-Adaptive Randomized Subspce Sampling," International Journal of Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol 10, no. 3, pp. 271--288, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Haario, H., Laine, M., Mira, A., and Sksman, E. 2006. "DRAM: Efficient adaptive MCMC," Statistics and Computing, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 339--354, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Muhammed, A., and Speck, J. B. 2002. "Probabilistic Remnant Life Assessment of Corroding Pipelines Within A Risk-Based Framework," Paper presented at ASRANet International Colloquium 2002, 8--10 July 2002, University of Glasgow, Scotland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Stephens, M., and Van Roodselaar, A. 2009. "Developments in Reliability-Based Corrosion Management and the Significance of In-Line Inspection Uncertainties," 17th JTM Milan, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Wu, Y-T., Hsaio, C. P., and van Roodselaar, A. 2009. "A Risk-Based Maintenance Optimization Methodology for Pipeline with Corrosion Defects," Proceedings of the ICOSSAR 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Wu, Y-T., and Shiao, M. 2009. "Sampling-Based Fast Probability Analyzer (FPA) for Reliability-Based Maintenance Optimization," Safety, Reliability and Risk of Structures, Infrastructures and Engineering Systems, Proceedings of the 10th International conference, Osaka, Japan, 2009Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Zhao, Yan-Gang, and Tetsuro Ono. 1999. "A general procedure for first/second-order reliability method (form/sorm)," Structural Safety, vol 21, no. 2, pp. 95--112, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A comparative study of Monte Carlo methods to compute rare event probabilities of failure in reliability models

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader