skip to main content
10.1145/2527031.2527044acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebsciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The web as an adaptive network: coevolution of web behavior and web structure

Published:15 June 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Much is known about the complex network structure of the Web, and about behavioral dynamics on the Web. A number of studies address how behaviors on the Web are affected by different network topologies, whilst others address how the behavior of users on the Web alters network topology. These represent complementary directions of influence, but they are generally not combined within any one study. In network science, the study of the coupled interaction between topology and behavior, or state-topology coevolution, is known as 'adaptive networks', and is a rapidly developing area of research. In this paper, we review the case for considering the Web as an adaptive network and several examples of state-topology coevolution on the Web. We also review some abstract results from recent literature in adaptive networks and discuss their implications for Web Science. We conclude that adaptive networks provide a formal framework for characterizing processes acting 'on' and 'of' the Web, and offers potential for identifying general organizing principles that seem otherwise illusive in Web Science.

References

  1. Watts, D. J. and Strogatz, S. H. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. 1998. Nature, 393, 6684, 440--442.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bárabasi, A. L. A., R. Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks. 1999. Science, 286, 5439, 509--512.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Newman, M. E. J. 2001. Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks. Physical Review E, 64, 2, 025102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Girvan, M. and Newman, M. E. J. Community structure in social and biological networks. 2002. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 12, 7821--7826.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Mislove, A., Marcon, M., Gummadi, K. P., Druschel, P. and Bhattacharjee, B. Measurement and analysis of online social networks. 2007. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement San Diego, California, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Dawkins, R. The Selfish Gene. 1989. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Leskovec, J., Backstrom, L. and Kleinberg, J. Memetracking and the dynamics of the news cycle. 2009. In Proceedings of 15th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. on Knowledge discovery and data mining. Paris, France. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Wu, S., Hofman, J. M., Mason, W. A. and Watts, D. J. Who says what to whom on twitter. 2011. In Proceedings of the WWW (2011). ACM, New York, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T. and Tseng, B. 2007. Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. In Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis. San Jose, California. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Letierce, J., Passant, A., Breslin, J. and Decker, S. 2010. Understanding how Twitter is used to spread scientific messages, In: Proceedings of the WebSci10: Extending the Frontiers of Society On-Line (April 26--27, 2010) Raleigh, NC, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Onnela, J.-P. and Reed-Tsochas, F. Spontaneous emergence of social influence in online systems. 2010. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (October 11, 2010)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Centola, D. 2010. The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment. Science, 329, 5996 (September 3, 2010), 1194--1197.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Kempe, D., Kleinberg, J. M. and Tardos, É. 2005. Influential nodes in a diffusion model for social networks. Computer, 3580, 1127--1138. Springer. 3580, 1127--1138. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Leskovec, J., Adamic, L. A. and Huberman, B. A. 2006. The dynamics of viral marketing. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Electronic commerce. Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Liu, Y.-Y., Slotine, J.-J. and Bárabasi, A.-L. 2011. Controllability of complex networks. Nature, 473, 7346, 167--173.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jin, E. M., Girvan, M. and Newman, M. E. J. 2001. Structure of growing social networks. Physical Review E, 64, 4, 046132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Dorogovtsev, S. N., Mendes, J. F. F. and Samukhin, A. N. 2000. Structure of Growing Networks with Preferential Linking. Physical Review Letters, 85, 21, 4633.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Kossinets, G. and Watts, D. J. Empirical Analysis of an Evolving Social Network. 2006. Science, 311, 5757 (January 6 2006) 88--90.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Liben-Nowell, D. and Kleinberg, J. 2007. The link-prediction problem for social networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 7. 1019--1031. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Backstrom, L., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J. and Lan, X.2006. Group formation in large social networks: membership, growth, and evolution. In Proceedings. of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. Philadelphia, PA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Chen, J., Geyer, W., Dugan, C., Muller, M. and Guy, I. Make new friends, but keep the old: recommending people on social networking sites. 2009. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems. (April 4-9, 2009) Boston, MA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Brzozowski, M. J. and Romero, D. M. 2011. Who Should I Follow? Recommending People in Directed Social Networks. In Proceedings of CSCW2011 (March 19-23, 2011) Hangzhou, China.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. McPherson, M., Lovin, L. and Cook, J. 2001. Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 1, 415--444.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Gross, T. and Sayama, H. 2009. Adaptive Networks. Springer-Verlag: BerlinGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Gross, T. and Blasius, B. 2008. Adaptive coevolutionary networks: a review. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 5, 20, 259--271.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Halford, S., Pope, C. and Carr, L. 2010. A Manifesto for Web Science In Proceedings of the WebSci10: Extending the Frontiers of Society On-Line (Raleigh, NC: US., April 26-27, 2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee, T., Hall, W., Hendler, J., O'Hara, K., Shadbolt, N. and Weitzner, D. A 2006. Framework for Web Science. Foundations and Trends in Web Science, 1--130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Hendler, J., Shadbolt, N., Hall, W., Berners-Lee, T. and Weitzner, D. 2008. Web Science: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Understanding the Web. Communications of the ACM, 51, 7, 60--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Jackson, M. O. and Watts, A. 2002. A. On the formation of interaction networks in social coordination games.. Games and Economic Behavior 41, 2, 265.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Pacheco, J. M., Traulsen, A. and Nowak, M. A. 2006. Coevolution of Strategy and Structure in Complex Networks with Dynamical Linking. Physical Review Letters, 97, 25, 258103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Herrera, J. L., Cosenza, M. G. and Tucci, K. 2011. General coevolution of topology and dynamics in networks. 2011. arXiv preprint arXiv:1102.3467.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Sayama, H. Call for papers: workshop on "State-Topology Coevolution in Adaptive Networks" (STCAN 2011). In Proceedings of the as part of the Eighth International Conference on Complex Systems (ICCS 2011) (Feb. 2011)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Berlingerio, M., Bonchi, F., Bj Bringmann, R. and Gionis, A. 2009. Mining Graph Evolution Rules. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases: Part I (Bled, Slovenia, 2009). Springer-Verlag, Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Kleinberg, J., Suri, S., Tardos, É. and Wexler, T. 2008. Strategic network formation with structural holes. SIGecom Exch., 7, 3, 1--4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Van Segbroeck, S., Santos, F. C., Lenaerts, T. and Pacheco, J. M. Reacting Differently to Adverse Ties Promotes Cooperation in Social Networks. 2009. Physical Review Letters, 102, 5, 058105.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Boccaletti, S., Latora, V., Moreno, Y., Chavez, M. and Hwang, D.-U. 2006. Complex networks: Structure and dynamics. Physics Reports, 424, 4-5, 175--308.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Strogatz, S. H. Exploring complex networks. Nature, 4102001), 268--276.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Newman, M. E. J. 2003. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review 45, 2, 167--256.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Holme, P. and Newman, M. E. J. 2006. Nonequilibrium phase transition in the coevolution of networks and opinions. Physical Review E, 74, 5, 056108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Nardini, C., Kozma, B., and Barrat, A. Who's Talking First? 2008. Consensus or Lack Thereof in Coevolving Opinion Formation Models. Physical Review Letters, 100, 15, 158701.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Kozma, B. and Barrat, A. 2008. Consensus formation on adaptive networks. Physical Review E, 77, 1, 016102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Centola, D., Gonzalez-Avella, Juan Carlos., Eguiluz, Victor M., Miguel, Maxi San Homophily, Cultural Drift and the Co-Evolution of Cultural Groups. 2007. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51, 6 (December 2007), 905--929.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Giddens, A. The constitution of society. 1984. Polity Press, Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Lane, D. C. 2001. Rerum cognoscere causas: Part II---Opportunities generated by the agency/structure debate and suggestions for clarifying the social theoretic position of system dynamics. System Dynamics Review, 17, 4, 293--309.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Lane, D. C. and Husemann, E. 2008. Steering without Circe: attending to reinforcing loops in social systems. System Dynamics Review, 24, 1, 37--61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Newman, M. E. J. 2002. Assortative Mixing in Networks. Physical Review Letters, 89, 20, 208701.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Gross, T. and Kevrekidis, I. G. 2008. Robust oscillations in SIS epidemics on adaptive networks: Coarse graining by automated moment closure. EPL (Europhysics Letters), 82, 38004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Shaw, L. B. and Schwartz, I. B. 2008. Fluctuating epidemics on adaptive networks. Physical Review E, 77, 6, 066101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Gross, T. and Kevrekidis, I. G. 2008. Robust oscillations in SIS epidemics on adaptive networks: Coarse graining by automated moment closure. EPL (Europhysics Letters), 82, 38004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Santos, F. C., Pacheco, J. M. and Lenaerts, T. 2006. Cooperation Prevails When Individuals Adjust Their Social Ties. PLoS Comput Biol, 2, 10, e140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Davies, A., Watson, R., Mills, R., Buckley, C. L. and Noble, J. 2010. If you can't be with the one you love, love the one you're with: How Individual Habituation of Agent Interactions Improves Global Utility. In Proc. Of Artificial Life XII, (Odense, Denmark August 19--23, 2010)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Watson, R. A., Buckley, C. L. and Mills, R. 2010. Optimization in "Self-modeling" complex adaptive systems. Complexity. Vol. 16 5, 17--26, (May/June 2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Watson, R. A., Mills, R. and Buckley, C. L. 2011. Global Adaptation in Networks of Selfish Components: Emergent Associative Memory at the System Scale. Artificial Life. (In Press) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Hebb, D. O. 2002. The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory. Psychology PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Broder, A., Kumar, R., Maghoul, F., Raghavan, P., Rajagopalan, S., Stata, R., Tomkins, A. and Wiener, J. 2000. Graph structure in the Web. Comput. Netw., 33, 1-6, 309--320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Wei, D., Zhou, T., Cimini, G., Wu, P., Liu, W. and Zhang, Y.-C. 2011. Effective mechanism for social recommendation of news. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 390, 11, 2117--2126.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Blasius, B. and Gross, T. 2009 Dynamic and Topological Interplay in Adaptive Networks. Wiley-VCH Weinheim.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Tetlow, P. D. 2007. The Web's Awake: An Introduction to the Field of Web Science and the Concept of Web Life. Wiley-Blackwell. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Rupert, M., Rattrout, A. and Hassas, S. 2008. The Web from a Complex Adaptive Systems Perspective. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 74, 2, 133--145. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Kauffman, S. A. 1993. The Origins of Order. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Miller, J. H. and Page, S. E. 2007. Complex Adaptive Systems: An Introduction to Computational Models of Social Life. Princeton University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Ebel, H. and Bornholdt, S. Coevolutionary Games on Networks. 2002. Physical Review E, 66, 5, 056118.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Eguíluz, V. M., Zimmermann, M. G., Cela-Conde, C. J. and Miguel, M. S. 2005. Cooperation and the Emergence of Role Differentiation in the Dynamics of Social Networks. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 4, 977--1008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology, 91, 3, 481--510.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. McEvily, B., Perrone, V. and Zaheer, A. 2003. Trust as an Organizing Principle. Organization Science, 14, 1 (January 1, 2003), 91--103. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Guha, R., Kumar, R., Raghavan, P. and Tomkins, A. 2004. Propagation of trust and distrust. In the Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web (New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Hwang, J., Altmann, J. and Kim, K. 2009.The structural evolution of the Web 2.0 service network. Online Information Review, 33, 6, 1040--1057.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Marsili, M., Vega-Redondo, F. and Slanina, F. 2004. The rise and fall of a networked society: A formal model. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 6 (February 10, 2004), 1439--1442.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Palla, G., Bárabasi, A.-L. and Vicsek, T. 2007. Quantifying social group evolution. Nature, 446, 7136, 664--667.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Albert, R. and Bárabasi, A.-L. 2000. Topology of Evolving Networks: Local Events and Universality. Physical Review Letters, 85, 24, 5234.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Ritzer, G. and Goodman, D. J. 2004. Sociological Theory. McGraw-Hill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Laland, K., Odling-Smee, J. and Feldman, M. Niche Construction, Biological Evolution and Cultural Change. 1999. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Powers, S. T. Social Niche Construction: Evolutionary Explanations for Cooperative Group Formation. Doctoral Thesis, University of Southampton.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Powers, S. T., Penn, A. S. and Watson, R. A. 2011.The Concurrent Evolution of Cooperation and the Population Structures that Support it. Evolution.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Shadbolt, N. and Berners-Lee, T. 2008. Web Science Emerges. Scientific American.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The web as an adaptive network: coevolution of web behavior and web structure

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          WebSci '11: Proceedings of the 3rd International Web Science Conference
          June 2011
          483 pages
          ISBN:9781450308557
          DOI:10.1145/2527031

          Copyright © 2011 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 15 June 2011

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          WebSci '11 Paper Acceptance Rate34of203submissions,17%Overall Acceptance Rate218of875submissions,25%

          Upcoming Conference

          Websci '24
          16th ACM Web Science Conference
          May 21 - 24, 2024
          Stuttgart , Germany

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader