skip to main content
research-article

On detection and tracking of variant phenomena clouds

Published:31 January 2014Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Phenomena clouds are characterized by nondeterministic, dynamic variations of shapes, sizes, direction, and speed of motion along multiple axes. The phenomena detection and tracking should not be limited to some traditional applications such as oil spills and gas clouds but also be utilized to more accurately observe other types of phenomena such as walking motion of people. This wider range of applications requires more reliable, in-situ techniques that can accurately adapt to the dynamics of phenomena. Unfortunately, existing works which only focus on simple and well-defined shapes of phenomena are no longer sufficient.

In this article, we present a new class of applications together with several distributed algorithms to detect and track phenomena clouds, regardless of their shapes and movement direction. We first propose a distributed algorithm for in-situ detection and tracking of phenomena clouds in a sensor space. We next provide a mathematical model to optimize the energy consumption, on which we further propose a localized algorithm to minimize the resource utilization. Our proposed approaches not only ensure low processing and networking overhead at the centralized query processor but also minimize the number of sensors which are actively involved in the detection and tracking processes. We validate our approach using both real-life smart home applications and simulation experiments, which confirm the effectiveness of our proposed algorithms. We also show that our algorithms result in significant reduction in resource usage and power consumption as compared to contemporary stream-based approaches.

References

  1. A. Abbasi and M. Younis. 2007. A survey on clustering algorithms for wireless sensor networks. Comput. Comm. 30, 2826--2841. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Ali, M. Mokbel, W. Aref, and I. Kamel. 2005. Detection and tracking of discrete phenomena in sensor-network databases. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management (SSDBM'05). 163--172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Bhattacharya, N. Atay, G. Alankus, C. Lu, O. B. Bayazit, and G. Roman. 2006. Roadmap query for sensor network assisted navigation in dynamic environments. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS'06). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. R. Bose and A. Helal. 2008. Observing walking behavior of humans using distributed phenomenon detection and tracking mechanisms. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Practical Applications of Sensor Networks, held in conjunction with the International Symposium on Applications and the Internet (SAINT'08). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. R. Bose and A. Helal. 2009. Localized in-network detection and tracking of phenomena clouds using wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Environments (IE'09).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. R. Bose, J. King, H. El-Zabadani, S. Pickles, and A. Helal. 2006. Building plug-and-play smart homes using the atlas platform. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Smart Homes and Health Telematics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. N. Bulusu, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin. 2000. Gps-less low cost outdoor location for very small devices. IEEE Personal. Comm. 7, 5, 28--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. M. Cardei, M. T. Thai, Y. Li, and W. Wu. 2005. Energy-efficient target coverage in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 24th Conference of the IEEE Communications Society (INFOCOM'05).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. K. K. Chintalapudi and R. Govindan. 2003. Localized edge detection in sensor fields. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Sensor Networks Protocols and Applications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. S. Duttagupta, K. Ramamritham, and P. Kulkarni. 2008. Tracking dynamic boundary fronts using range sensors. In Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Wireless Sensor Networks. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. S. Duttagupta, K. Ramamritham, and P. Ramanathan. 2006. Distributed boundary tracking using sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. A. Helal, W. Mann, H. El-Zabadani, J. King, Y. Kaddoura, and E. Jansen. 2005. Gator tech smart house: A programmable pervasive space. Comput. 38, 3, 50--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. X. Ji, H. Zha, J. Metzner, and G. Kesidis. 2004. Dynamic cluster structure for object detection and tracking in wireless ad-hoc sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications. 3807--3811.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Z. Jin and A. L. Bertozzi. 2007. Environmental boundary tracking and estimation using multiple autonomous vehicles. In Proceedings of the 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. 4918--4923.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. P. Juang, H. Oki, Y. Wang, M. Martonosi, L. Peh, and D. Rubenstein. 2002. Energy-efficient computing for wildlife tracking: Design tradeoffs and early experiences with zebranet. SIGARCH Comput. Archit. News 30, 5, 96--107. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. Kim, K. Kim, C. S. Hussain, M. Cui, and M. Park. 2008. Energy-efficient tracking of continuous objects in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing (UIC'08). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J. King, R. Bose, S. Pickles, A. Helal, and H. Yang. 2006. Atlas - A service-oriented sensor platform. In Proceeding of the 1st IEEE International Workshop on Practical Issues in Building Sensor Network Applications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. P. Liao, M. Chang, and C. C. Kuo. 2004. Distributed edge detection with composite hypothesis test in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM'04). 129--133.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. S. Madden, M. Franklin, J. Hellerstein, and W. Hong. 2002. Tag: A tiny aggregation service for ad-hoc sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. D. Marthaler and A. L. Bertozzi. 2003. Collective motion algorithms for determining environmental boundaries. In Proceedings of the SIAM Conference on Applications of Dynamical Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. D. McErlean and S. Narayanan. 2002. Distributed detection and tracking in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 36th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. B. N. D. Niculescu. 2003. Ad hoc positioning system (aps) using aoa. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Joint Conference of IEEE Computer and Communication Societies.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. A. Omotayo, M. Hammad, and K. Barker. 2006. Effcient data harvesting for tracing phenomena in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management (SSDBM'06). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Palm. 2000. The 29 palms experiment: Tracking vehicles with a uav-delivered sensor network. http://tinyos.millennium.berkeley.edu/29palms.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. K. Ren, K. Zeng, and W. Lou. 2008. Secure and fault-tolerant event boundary detection in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Comm. 7, 1, 352--363. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. A. Savvides, J. Fang, and D. Lymberopoulos. 2004. Using mobile sensing nodes for dynamic boundary estimation. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Applications of Mobile Embedded Systems (WAMES'04).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. M. T. Thai, F. Wang, D. H. Du, and X. Jia. 2008. Coverage problems in wireless sensor networks: designs and analysis. Int. J. Sens. Netw. 3, 3, 191--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. C. Zhang, Y. Zhang, and Y. Fang. 2006. Localized coverage boundary detection for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Quality of Service in Heterogeneous Wired/Wireless Networks (QShine'06). ACM Press, New York, 12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. C. Zhong and M. Worboys. 2007. Energy-efficient continuous boundary monitoring insensor networks. http://www.spatial.maine.edu/czhong /boundarymonitoring.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. On detection and tracking of variant phenomena clouds

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
      ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks  Volume 10, Issue 2
      January 2014
      609 pages
      ISSN:1550-4859
      EISSN:1550-4867
      DOI:10.1145/2575808
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 31 January 2014
      • Accepted: 1 April 2013
      • Revised: 1 January 2013
      • Received: 1 February 2011
      Published in tosn Volume 10, Issue 2

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader