skip to main content
10.1145/2531602.2531612acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

"Figure out how to code with the hands of others": recognizing cultural blind spots in global software development

Published:15 February 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

We report on an ethnographic study of an outsourcing global software development (GSD) setup between an Indian IT vendor and an IT development division of a Danish bank. We investigate how the local IT development work is shaped by the global setup in GSD and argue that the bank had cultural blind spots toward the changes in Denmark. Three critical issues were neglected due to the cultural blind spots: 1) increased number of interruptions, 2) lack of translucence of remote colleagues' work, and 3) the re-definition of boundaries between work and articulation work. The implications of these findings include considerations for how to organize GSD practices and prepare the organizational changes that occur when moving from a co-located software development organization to an inter-organizational geographically distributed organization. Also, our findings open up discussions about the professional identity of IT developers within GSD, including extending the qualifications for IT developers.

References

  1. Al-Ani, B., et al. (2013). Globally distributed system developers: their trust expectations and processes. Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM: 563--574. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Avram, G. (2007). Knowledge Work Practices in Global Software Development. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management. 5(4): 347--356.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Avram, G., et al. (2009). Bridging, Patching and Keeping the Work Flowing: Defect Resolution in Distributed Software Development. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). 18(5--6): 477507. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bjørn, P. and N. Boulus (2011). Dissenting in reflective conversations: Critical components of doing action research. Action Research. 9(3): 282--302.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Bjørn, P. and O. Ngwenyama (2009). Virtual team collaboration: building shared meaning, resolving breakdowns and creating translucence. Information Systems Journal. 19(3): 227--253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Boden, A., et al. (2009). Knowledge Management in Distributed Software Development Teams - Does Culture Matter? In Proc. Conference, IEEE Computer Society: 18--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Boden, A., et al. (2007). Coordination Practices in Distributed Software Development of Small Enterprises. Proceedings of the International Conference on Global Software Engineering. IEEE Computer Society: 235246. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Boden, A., et al. (2009). Trust and Social Capital: Revisiting an Offshoring Failure Story of a Small German Software Company. ECSCW 2009. I. Wagner, H. Tellioğlu, E. Balka, C. Simone and L. Ciolfi. Published, Springer London: 123--142.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Clausen, L. and M. Zølner (2010). Cultural Awareness Processes in Corporate Knowledge Sharing: Turning "Cultural Blind Spots" into Resources. Paper presented at The Academy of Management Annual Meeting 2010, Montréal, Canada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Durnell Cramton, C. and P. J. Hinds (2005). Subgroup Dynamics in Internationally Distributed Teams: Ethnocentrism or Cross-National Learning. Research in Organizational Behavior. 26(0): 231- 263.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Faraj, S. and L. Sproull (2000). Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams. Manage. Sci. 46(12): 1554--1568. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Gerson, E. M. (2008). Reach, Bracket, and the Limits of Rationalized Coordination: Some Challenges for CSCW. Resources, Co-Evolution and Artifacts. Published, Springer London: 193--220.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Gumienny, R., et al. (2013). Supporting creative collaboration in globally distributed companies. In Proc. Conference, ACM: 995--1007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Herbsleb, J. D. (2007). Global Software Engineering: The Future of Socio-technical Coordination. 2007 Future of Software Engineering. IEEE Computer Society: 188--198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hossain, E., et al. (2011). Scrum practices in global software development: a research framework. In Proc. Conference, Springer-Verlag: 88--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Iversen, J. H., et al. (2004). Managing risk in software process improvement: an action research approach. MIS Q. 28(3): 395--433. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Jensen, R. E. and P. Bjørn (2012). Divergence and Convergence in Global Software Development: Cultural Complexities as Social Worlds. From Research to Practice in the Design of Cooperative Systems: Results and Open Challenges. J. Dugdale, C. Masclet, M. A. Grasso, J.-F. Boujut and P. Hassanaly. Published, Springer London: 123--136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Krishna, S., et al. (2004). Managing cross-cultural issues in global software outsourcing. Commun. ACM. 47(4): 62--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, OUP Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Luff, P., et al. (2000). Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing System Design, Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Majchrzak, A., et al. (2000). Technology adaption: the case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Q. 24(4): 569--600. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Marlow, J., et al. (2013). Impression formation in online peer production: activity traces and personal profiles in github. Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM: 117--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Massey, A. P., et al. (2003). Because Time Matters: Temporal Coordination in Global Virtual Project Teams Journal of Management Information Systems. 19(4): 129--155. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Maznevski, M. L. and K. M. Chudoba (2000). Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness Organization Science. 11(5): 473--492. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. O'Neill, J., et al. (2011). When a little knowledge isn't a dangerous thing. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM: 1667--1676. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Prikladnicki, R., et al. (2013). Data collection in global software engineering research: learning from past experience. Empirical Software Engineering: 1--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Randall, D., et al. (2010). Fieldwork for Design: Theory and Practice, Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Schmidt, K. and L. Bannon (1992). Taking CSCW seriously. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). 1(1--2): 7--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Schmidt, K. and C. Simone (1996). Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). 5(2--3): 155--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Søderberg, A.-M., et al. (2013). Global Software Development: Commitment, Trust and Cultural Sensitivity in Strategic Partnerships. Journal of International Management. (in press).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Strauss, A. (1988). The articulation of project work: An organizational process. The Sociological Quarterly. 29(2): 163--178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Walsham, G. (2002). Cross-cultural software production and use: a structurational analysis. MIS Q. 26(4): 359380. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. "Figure out how to code with the hands of others": recognizing cultural blind spots in global software development

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CSCW '14: Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing
        February 2014
        1600 pages
        ISBN:9781450325400
        DOI:10.1145/2531602

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 15 February 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CSCW '14 Paper Acceptance Rate134of497submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

        Upcoming Conference

        CSCW '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader