ABSTRACT
We report on an ethnographic study of an outsourcing global software development (GSD) setup between an Indian IT vendor and an IT development division of a Danish bank. We investigate how the local IT development work is shaped by the global setup in GSD and argue that the bank had cultural blind spots toward the changes in Denmark. Three critical issues were neglected due to the cultural blind spots: 1) increased number of interruptions, 2) lack of translucence of remote colleagues' work, and 3) the re-definition of boundaries between work and articulation work. The implications of these findings include considerations for how to organize GSD practices and prepare the organizational changes that occur when moving from a co-located software development organization to an inter-organizational geographically distributed organization. Also, our findings open up discussions about the professional identity of IT developers within GSD, including extending the qualifications for IT developers.
- Al-Ani, B., et al. (2013). Globally distributed system developers: their trust expectations and processes. Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM: 563--574. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Avram, G. (2007). Knowledge Work Practices in Global Software Development. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management. 5(4): 347--356.Google Scholar
- Avram, G., et al. (2009). Bridging, Patching and Keeping the Work Flowing: Defect Resolution in Distributed Software Development. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). 18(5--6): 477507. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bjørn, P. and N. Boulus (2011). Dissenting in reflective conversations: Critical components of doing action research. Action Research. 9(3): 282--302.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bjørn, P. and O. Ngwenyama (2009). Virtual team collaboration: building shared meaning, resolving breakdowns and creating translucence. Information Systems Journal. 19(3): 227--253.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Boden, A., et al. (2009). Knowledge Management in Distributed Software Development Teams - Does Culture Matter? In Proc. Conference, IEEE Computer Society: 18--27. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Boden, A., et al. (2007). Coordination Practices in Distributed Software Development of Small Enterprises. Proceedings of the International Conference on Global Software Engineering. IEEE Computer Society: 235246. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Boden, A., et al. (2009). Trust and Social Capital: Revisiting an Offshoring Failure Story of a Small German Software Company. ECSCW 2009. I. Wagner, H. Tellioğlu, E. Balka, C. Simone and L. Ciolfi. Published, Springer London: 123--142.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Clausen, L. and M. Zølner (2010). Cultural Awareness Processes in Corporate Knowledge Sharing: Turning "Cultural Blind Spots" into Resources. Paper presented at The Academy of Management Annual Meeting 2010, Montréal, Canada.Google Scholar
- Durnell Cramton, C. and P. J. Hinds (2005). Subgroup Dynamics in Internationally Distributed Teams: Ethnocentrism or Cross-National Learning. Research in Organizational Behavior. 26(0): 231- 263.Google Scholar
- Faraj, S. and L. Sproull (2000). Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams. Manage. Sci. 46(12): 1554--1568. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gerson, E. M. (2008). Reach, Bracket, and the Limits of Rationalized Coordination: Some Challenges for CSCW. Resources, Co-Evolution and Artifacts. Published, Springer London: 193--220.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gumienny, R., et al. (2013). Supporting creative collaboration in globally distributed companies. In Proc. Conference, ACM: 995--1007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Herbsleb, J. D. (2007). Global Software Engineering: The Future of Socio-technical Coordination. 2007 Future of Software Engineering. IEEE Computer Society: 188--198. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hossain, E., et al. (2011). Scrum practices in global software development: a research framework. In Proc. Conference, Springer-Verlag: 88--102. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Iversen, J. H., et al. (2004). Managing risk in software process improvement: an action research approach. MIS Q. 28(3): 395--433. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jensen, R. E. and P. Bjørn (2012). Divergence and Convergence in Global Software Development: Cultural Complexities as Social Worlds. From Research to Practice in the Design of Cooperative Systems: Results and Open Challenges. J. Dugdale, C. Masclet, M. A. Grasso, J.-F. Boujut and P. Hassanaly. Published, Springer London: 123--136.Google Scholar
- Krishna, S., et al. (2004). Managing cross-cultural issues in global software outsourcing. Commun. ACM. 47(4): 62--66. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, OUP Oxford.Google Scholar
- Luff, P., et al. (2000). Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing System Design, Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Majchrzak, A., et al. (2000). Technology adaption: the case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Q. 24(4): 569--600. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marlow, J., et al. (2013). Impression formation in online peer production: activity traces and personal profiles in github. Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM: 117--128. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Massey, A. P., et al. (2003). Because Time Matters: Temporal Coordination in Global Virtual Project Teams Journal of Management Information Systems. 19(4): 129--155. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Maznevski, M. L. and K. M. Chudoba (2000). Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness Organization Science. 11(5): 473--492. Google ScholarDigital Library
- O'Neill, J., et al. (2011). When a little knowledge isn't a dangerous thing. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM: 1667--1676. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Prikladnicki, R., et al. (2013). Data collection in global software engineering research: learning from past experience. Empirical Software Engineering: 1--35.Google Scholar
- Randall, D., et al. (2010). Fieldwork for Design: Theory and Practice, Springer. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schmidt, K. and L. Bannon (1992). Taking CSCW seriously. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). 1(1--2): 7--40.Google Scholar
- Schmidt, K. and C. Simone (1996). Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). 5(2--3): 155--200. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Søderberg, A.-M., et al. (2013). Global Software Development: Commitment, Trust and Cultural Sensitivity in Strategic Partnerships. Journal of International Management. (in press).Google Scholar
- Strauss, A. (1988). The articulation of project work: An organizational process. The Sociological Quarterly. 29(2): 163--178.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Walsham, G. (2002). Cross-cultural software production and use: a structurational analysis. MIS Q. 26(4): 359380. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- "Figure out how to code with the hands of others": recognizing cultural blind spots in global software development
Recommendations
Why Replacing Legacy Systems Is So Hard in Global Software Development: An Information Infrastructure Perspective
CSCW '15: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social ComputingWe report on an ethnographic study of an outsourcing global software development (GSD) setup between a Danish IT company and an Indian IT vendor developing a system to replace a legacy system for social services administration in Denmark. Physical ...
Why Closely Coupled Work Matters in Global Software Development
GROUP '14: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group WorkWe report on an ethnographic study of an offshore global software development project between Danish and Philippine developers in a Danish company called GlobalSoft. We investigate why the IT- developers chose to engage in more closely coupled work as ...
Factors influencing vendor organizations in the selection of DevOps for global software development: an exploratory study using a systematic literature review
AbstractThis study is motivated by the apparent shortage of DevOps practices being used in global software development. DevOps is an attractive option for software development companies due to its benefits such as bridging the gap between development and ...
Comments