The effects of consistency maintenance methods on player experience and performance in networked games

ABSTRACT

Network lag is a fact of life for networked games. Lag can cause game states to diverge at different nodes in the network, making it difficult to maintain the illusion of a single shared space. Traditional lag compensation techniques help reduce inconsistency in networked games; however, these techniques do not address what to do when states actually have diverged. Traditional consistency maintenance (CM) does not specify how to make game- critical decisions when players' views of the shared state are different, nor does it indicate how to repair inconsistencies. These two issues -- decision-making and error repair -- can have substantial effects on players' gaming experience. To address this shortcoming, we have characterized a range of algorithmic choices for decision- making and error repair. We report on a study confirming that these algorithms can have significant effects on player experience and performance, and showing that they are often more important than degree of consistency itself.

References

1. Aggarwal, S., Banavar, H., and Khandelwal, A. Accuracy in dead-reckoning based distributed multiplayer games. SIGCOMM Workshops, (2004), 161--165.
2. Aldridge, D. I shot you first! Gameplay networking in Halo: Reach. Game Developers Conference, (2011).
3. Armitage, G., An experimental estimation of latency sensitivity in multiplayer Quake 3. Networks, (2003), 137--141
4. Beigbeder, T., Coughlan, R., Lusher, C., Plunkett, J., Agu, E., and Claypool, M. The Effects of Loss and Latency on User Performance in Unreal Tournament 2003. SIGCOMM'04 Workshops, (2003), 144--151.
5. Bernier, Y.W. Latency compensation methods in client/server in-game protocol design and optimization. Game Developers Conference, (2001).
6. Bettner, P. and Terrano, M. 1500 archers on a 28.8 network: Programming in the Age of Empires and beyond. Game Developers Conference, (2001).
7. Brun, J., Safaei, F., and Boustead, P., Managing latency and fairness in networked games. Commun. ACM 49, 11 (2006), 46--51.
8. Chandler, A. and Finney, J. On the effects of loose causal consistency in mobile multiplayer games. NetGames '05, (2005), 1--11.
9. Chen, H., Chen, L., and Chen, G. Effects of local-lag mechanism on task performance in a desktop CVE system. JCST, Vol. 20, 3 (2005), 396--401.
10. Claypool, M. The effect of latency on user performance in real-time strategy games. Elsevier Computer Networks, Vol 49, (2005) 52--70.
11. Claypool, M. and Claypool, K. Latency and player actions in online games. CACM 49, 11 (2006), 40--45.
12. Dick, M., Wellnitz, O., and Wolf, L. Analysis of factors affecting players' performance and perception in multiplayer games. NetGames'05, (2005), 1--7.
13. Fiedler, G. Networked Physics. 2006. gafferongames.com/game-physics/networked-physics/.
14. Greenberg, S. and Marwood, D. Real time groupware as a distributed system: Concurrency control and its effect on the interface. CSCW, (1994), 207--217.
15. Hogland, G. and McGraw, G. Exploiting online games: Cheating massively distributed systems. AddisonWesley, 2007.
16. IEEE. IEEE Standard for Distributed Interactive Simulation - Application Protocols. IEEE Standard 1278.1--1995 (revision of IEEE Std 1278--1993), 1995. - 12 -
17. Mauve, M., Vogel, J., Hilt, V., and Effelsberg, W. Local-lag and timewarp : Providing consistency for replicated continuous applications. Transactions on Multimedia 6, 1 (2004), 47--57.
18. Murphy, C. Believable dead reckoning for networked games. In E. Lengyel, ed., Game Engine Gems, Volume 2. CRC Press, 2011, 307--328.
19. Nichols, J. and Claypool, M. The effects of latency on online Madden NFL football. NOSSDAV '04, 146--151.
20. Pantel, L. and Wolf, L.C. On the suitability of dead reckoning schemes for games. NetGames'02, (2002), 79--84.
21. Pantel, L. and Wolf, L.C. On the impact of delay on real-time multiplayer games. Proc NOSSDAV (2002), 23--29.
22. Savery, C., Graham, T.C.N., and Gutwin, C. The human factors of consistency maintenance in multiplayer computer games. GROUP'10, (2010), 187--196.
23. Savery, C. and Graham, T.C.N. Timelines: Simplifying the programming of lag compensation for the next generation of networked games. Multimedia Systems, (2012).
24. Smed, J. and Hakonen, H. Algorithms and networking for computer games. Wiley, 2006.
25. Stuckel, D. and Gutwin, C. The effects of local lag on tightly-coupled interaction in distributed groupware. CSCW'08, (2008), 447--456.
26. Zhao, S., Li, D., Lu, T., and Gu, N. Back to the future: A hybrid approach to transparent sharing of video games over the internet in real time. CSCW'11, (2011), 187--196.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Collaborative and social computing