skip to main content
10.1145/2532352.2532355acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesscConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A pilot study: design patterns in parallel program development

Published:17 November 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

The software engineering community has widely used design patterns to solve software design problems and improve software development. However, there is little evidence about whether the use of design patterns has the same effect in a parallel computing environment. The growth of high-performance computing (HPC) has been achieved through massive parallelization. This paper presents a pilot controlled experiment with an objective to verify the experimental design and instrumentation. The study assessed the usability of design pattern implementations versus alternative implementations of the parallel program implemented with the Message Passing Interface (MPI). This paper describes the research questions, hypotheses and experimental design. The collected data indicated that the study design and materials produced the necessary results to be able to analyze and answer the research questions. Additionally, this paper discusses lessons learned from the experiment in order to be useful for the full-scale study.

References

  1. Arisholm, E., and Sjoberg, D. I. K. Evaluating the effect of a delegated versus centralized control style on the maintainability of object-oriented software. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 30, 8 (2004), 521--534. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., and Vlissides, J. Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., MA, USA, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Hochstein, L., Nakamura, T., Basili, V. R., Asgari, S., Zelkowitz, M. V., Hollingsworth, J. K., Shull, F., Carver, J., Voelp, M., Zazworka, N., and Johnson, P. M. Experiments to understand HPC time to development. CTWatch Quarterly (Nov. 2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Liu, J., Chandrasekaran, B., Wu, J., Jiang, W., Kini, S., Yu, W., Buntinas, D., Wyckoff, P., and Panda, D. Performance comparison of MPI implementations over InfiniBand, Myrinet and Quadrics. In ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing (2003), pp. 58--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Massingill, B. L., Mattson, T. G., and Sanders, B. A. Simd: an additional pattern for PLPP (Pattern Language for Parallel Programming). In Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (NY, USA, 2007), ACM, pp. 6:1--6:15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Mattson, T., Sanders, B., and Massingill, B. Patterns for parallel programming, 1st ed. Addison-Wesley Professional, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. McCabe, T. A complexity measure. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering SE-2, 4 (1976), 308--320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Ortega-Arjona, J. L. Patterns for Parallel Software Design, 1st ed. Wiley Publishing, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A pilot study: design patterns in parallel program development

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SE-HPCCSE '13: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Software Engineering for High Performance Computing in Computational Science and Engineering
        November 2013
        49 pages
        ISBN:9781450324991
        DOI:10.1145/2532352

        Copyright © 2013 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 17 November 2013

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        SE-HPCCSE '13 Paper Acceptance Rate7of12submissions,58%Overall Acceptance Rate7of12submissions,58%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader