skip to main content
10.1145/2541016.2541027acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Gelatine: making coworking places gel for better collaboration and social learning

Published:25 November 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Public libraries and coworking spaces seek for means to facilitate peer collaboration, peer inspiration and cross-pollination of skills and creativity. However, social learning, inspiration and collaboration between coworkers do not come naturally. In particular in (semi-) public spaces, the behavioural norm among unacquainted coworkers is to work in individual silos without taking advantage of social learning or collaboration opportunities. This paper presents results from a pilot study of 'Gelatine' -- a system that facilitates shared encounters between coworkers by allowing them to digitally 'check in' at a work space. Gelatine displays skills, areas of interest, and needs of currently present coworkers on a public screen. The results indicate that the system amplifies users' sense of place and awareness of other coworkers, and serves as an interface for social learning through exploratory, opportunistic and serendipitous inspirations, as well as through helping users identify like-minded peers for follow-up face-to-face encounters. We discuss how Gelatine is perceived by users with different pre-entry motivations, and discuss users' challenges as well as non-use of the system.

References

  1. Aabo, S., & Audunson, R. (2012). Use of library space and the library as place. Library & Information Science Research, 34, 138--149.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Aabo, S., Audunson, R., & Varheim, A. (2010). How do public libraries function as meeting places? Library & Information Science Research, 32, 16--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bilandzic, M., & Foth, M. (2013). Libraries as Coworking Spaces: Understanding User Motivations and Perceived Barriers to Social Learning. Library Hi Tech, 31(2), 254--273.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Bilandzic, M., & Johnson, D. (2013, forthcoming). Hybrid Placemaking in the Library: Designing Digital Technology to Enhance Users' On-Site Experience. Australian Library Journal.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Björneborn, L. (2010). Design dimensions enabling divergent behaviour across physical, digital, and social library interfaces. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Persuasive Technology, Copenhagen, Denmark. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Certeau, Michel de, & Rendall, Steven. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Churchill, E. F., Nelson, L., Denoue, L., Helfman, J., & Murphy, P. (2004). Sharing multimedia content with interactive public displays: a case study. Proceedings of the 5th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Deskmag. (2011). What Coworkers want. from http://www.deskmag.com/en/what-coworking-spaces-coworkers-want-165Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. DiMicco, J. M, Millen, D. R, Geyer, W., & Dugan, C. (2008). Research on the use of social software in the workplace. Paper presented at the CSCW'08 Workshop, Social Networking in Organizations, San Diego, California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Dourish, P. (2006). Re-space-ing place: "place" and "space" ten years on. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on CSCW, Banff, Alberta, Canada. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Fatah gen. Schieck, A., Kostakos, V., & Penn, A. (2010). Exploring Digital Encounters in the Public Arena. In K. S. Willis, G. Roussos, K. Chorianopoulos & M. Struppek (Eds.), Shared encounters (pp. 179--195). London: Springer-Verlag New York Inc. c.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Goffman, Erving. (1966). Behavior in public places: notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York: Free Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Goffman, Erving. (1972). Encounters: two studies in the sociology of interaction. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Groenbaek, K., Rohde, A., Sundararajah, B., & Bech-Petersen, S. (2006). InfoGallery: informative art services for physical library spaces. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Harrison, S., & Dourish, P. (1996). Re-place-ing space: the roles of place and space in collaborative systems. Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on CSCW Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Huang, E., Koster, A., & Borchers, J. (2008). Overcoming assumptions and uncovering practices: When does the public really look at public displays? Pervasive Computing, 228--243. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. IBM Research. (2011). Beehive (SocialBlue). Retrieved 16 February, 2013, from http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view_project.php?id=1231Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Konomi, Shin'ichi, Sezaki, Kaoru, & Kitsuregawa, Masaru. (2010). History-Enriched Spaces for Shared Encounters. In K. S. Willis, G. Roussos, K. Chorianopoulos & M. Struppek (Eds.), Shared Encounters (pp. 47--60): Springer London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. LaPointe, L. M. (2006). Coffee anyone? College & research libraries news, 67(2), 97--99.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Leckie, G. J., & Hopkins, J. (2002). The public place of central libraries: Findings from Toronto and Vancouver. The Library Quarterly, 72(3), 326--372.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Lefebvre, Henri. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Legrady, G. (2005). Making visible the invisible. Retrieved 20 January, 2013, from http://www.mat.ucsb.edu/g.legrady/glWeb/Projects/spl/spl.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Ludwig, L., & Starr, S. (2005). Library as place: results of a delphi study. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 93(3), 315.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. McCarthy, J. F., Congleton, B., & Harper, F. M. (2008). The context, content & community collage: sharing personal digital media in the physical workplace. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. McCarthy, J. F., Farnham, S. D., Patel, Y., Ahuja, S., Norman, D., Hazlewood, W. R., & Lind, J. (2009). Supporting community in third places with situated social software. Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Communities and technologies. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. McKechnie, L. E. F., French, PK, Goodall, G. R., Kipp, M., Paquette, D. L., & Pecoskie, J. L. (2004). Covered beverages now allowed: Public libraries and book superstores. Canadian journal of information and library science, 28(3), 39--51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Michelis, D., & Müller, J. (2011). The audience funnel: Observations of gesture based interaction with multiple large displays in a city center. Intl. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 27(6), 562--579.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Morrison, A., Jacucci, G., & Peltonen, P. (2008). CityWall: Limitations of a multi-touch environment. Proc. PPD 2008, 31--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Müller, J., Alt, F., Michelis, D., & Schmidt, A. (2010). Requirements and design space for interactive public displays. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the international conference on Multimedia. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Müller, J., Wilmsmann, D., Exeler, J., Buzeck, M., Schmidt, A., Jay, T., & Krüger, A. (2009). Display Blindness: The effect of Expectations on Attention towards Digital Signage. Proceedings of Pervasive 2009, Nara. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Oldenburg, R. (2001). Celebrating the third place: inspiring stories about the "great good places" at the heart of our communities. New York: Marlowe & Co.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Partnership for 21st century skills. (2011). Framework for 21st Century Learning. Retrieved 1 December, 2012, from http://www.p21.org/overview/skills-frameworkGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Satchell, Christine, & Dourish, Paul. (2009). Beyond the user: use and non-use in HCI. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of OzCHI: Design: Open 24/7, Melbourne, Australia. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Schneekloth, Lynda H., & Shibley, Robert G. (1995). Placemaking: the art and practice of building communities. New York: Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Schroeter, R., Foth, M., & Satchell, C. (2012). People, content, location: sweet spotting urban screens for situated engagement. Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Shill, H. B., & Tonner, S. (2003). Creating a better place: Physical improvements in academic libraries, 1995--2002. College & Research Libraries, 64(6), 431--466.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Sinclair, B. (2007). Commons 2.0: Library Spaces Designed for Collaborative Learning. EDUCAUSE Quarterly Magazine, 30(4), 4--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Sinclair, J., & Cardew-Hall, M. (2008). The folksonomy tag cloud: when is it useful? Journal of Information Science, 34(1), 15--29. doi: 10.1177/0165551506078083 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Soja, Edward W. (1996). Thirdspace: journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Struppek, M. (2006). The social potential of Urban Screens. Visual Communication, 5(2), 173--188.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Talve, A. (2011). Libraries as places of invention. Library Management, 32(8/9), 493--504.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Thudt, A., Hinrichs, U., & Carpendale, S. (2012). The bohemian bookshelf: supporting serendipitous book discoveries through information visualization. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Austin, Texas. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Tuan, Yi-fu. (1977). Space and place: the perspective of experience. Minneapolis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Waxman, L., Clemons, S., Banning, J., & McKelfresh, D. (2007). The library as place: Providing students with opportunities for socialization, relaxation, and restoration. New Library World, 108(9/10), 424--434.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Willis, K., Roussos, G., Chorianopoulos, K., & Struppek, M. (2010). Shared Encounters. In K. Willis, G. Roussos, K. Chorianopoulos & M. Struppek (Eds.), Shared encounters (pp. 1--15). London: Springer-Verlag New York Inc. c.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Gelatine: making coworking places gel for better collaboration and social learning

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      OzCHI '13: Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration
      November 2013
      549 pages
      ISBN:9781450325257
      DOI:10.1145/2541016

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 November 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      OzCHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate34of70submissions,49%Overall Acceptance Rate362of729submissions,50%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader