skip to main content
10.1145/2556288.2557300acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Social dependency and mobile autonomy: supporting older adults' mobility with ridesharing ict

Published:26 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Alternative mobility modes for older adults are increasingly important for economic, ecological and social reasons. A promising option is ridesharing, defined as use of the same vehicle by two or more people traveling to a common destination. In particular, mobile computer supported ridesharing provides a promising way to enlarge older adults' mobility choices in addition to private driving and public transportation options. In order to understand the opportunities and obstacles of ridesharing from the point of view of elderly people, we conducted an interview study in order to examining ridesharing experiences. It turns out that "mobile independence" and "decisional autonomy" are key issues for mobile wellbeing. This partially conflicts with common ridesharing concepts. Hence, we further analyze older adults' strategies dealing with these conflicts and show that these strategies offer departure points for the design ridesharing solutions, which are better suited to the demands of older adults.

References

  1. Adler, G. and Rottunda, S. Older adults' perspectives on driving cessation. Journal of Aging studies 20, 3 (2006), 227--235.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, J. L. human-center ridesharing - A sustainable solution. CHI, ACM, (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Beswick, A. D., Rees, K., Dieppe, P., et al. Complex interventions to improve physical function and maintain independent living in elderly peoples. The Lancet 371, 9614 (2008), 725--735.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Brereton, M., Roe, P., Foth, M., Bunker, J. M., and Buys, L. Designing participation in agile ridesharing with mobile social software. Proc. of OzCHI (2009), 257--260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Coughlin, J. F. Technology and the Future of Aging. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 38, 1 (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dumbaugh, E. Designing Communities to Enhance the Safety and Mobility of Older Adults. Journal of Planning Literature 23, 1 (2008), 17--36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Fobker, S. and Grotz, R. Everyday mobility of elderly people in different urban settings. Urban Studies 43, 1 (2006), 99--118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Ghelawat, S., Radke, K., and Brereton, M. Interaction, privacy and profiling considerations in local mobile social software. Proc. of OzCHI (2010), 376--379. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Handke, V. and Jonuschat, H. Flexible Ridesharing: New Opportunities and Service Concepts for Sustainable Mobility. Springer, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hansen, E. G., Gomm, M. L., Bullinger, A. C., and Moslein, K. M. A community-based toolkit for designing ride-sharing services. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development 5, 1 (2010), 80--99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Kaiser, H. J. Mobility in Old Age Beyond the Transportation Perspective. Journal of Applied Gerontology 28, 4 (2009), 411--418.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Laurier, E., Lorimer, H., Brown, B., et al. Driving and "Passengering": Notes on the Ordinary Organization of Car Travel. Mobilities 3, 1 (2008), 1--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Lord, S., Després, C., and Ramadier, T. When mobility makes sense: A qualitative and longitudinal study of the daily mobility of the elderly. Journal of Environmental psychology 31, 1 (2011), 52--61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Mauss, M. The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies, trans. WD Halls. New York and London: WW Norton, (1990).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Mirisaee, S. H., Brereton, M., and Roe, P. Bridging the representation and interaction challenges of mobile context-aware computing: designing agile ridesharing. Proc. of OzCHI, ACM (2011), 221--224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Mirisaee, S. H. A human-centred context-aware approach to develop open-standard agile ridesharing using mobile social networks. Proc. of OzCHI (2010), 445--448. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Mollenkopf, H., Marcellini, F., Ruoppila, I., Széman, Z., and Tacken, M. Enhancing mobility in later life. Ios Press, Amsterdam, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Nicolini, D. Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction. Oxford University Press, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Ozenc, F. K., and Morris, J. H. Adapt-a-ride: understanding the dynamics of commuting preferences through an experience design framework. Proc. of Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, (2011), 61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Plath, D. Independence in Old Age: The Route to Social Exclusion British Journal of Social Work 38, 7 (2008), 1353--1369.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Radke, K., Brereton, M., Mirisaee, S., Ghelawat, S., Boyd, C., and Nieto, J. G. Tensions in developing a secure collective information practice - the case of agile ridesharing. In Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 2011. Springer, 2011, 524--532. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Rosenbloom, S. The Mobility Needs of Older Americans. Taking the High Road, TRB, (2004), 227--54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Scheiner, J. Does the car make elderly people happy and mobile? European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 6, 2 (2006), 151--172.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Schwanen, T., Banister, D., and Bowling, A. Independence and mobility in later life. Geoforum 43, 6 (2012), 1313--1322.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Sheller, M. and Urry, J. Mobile Transformations of "Public" and "Private" Life. Theory, Culture & Society 20, 3 (2003), 107--125.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Sherlock, K. Revisiting the concept of hosts and guests. Tourist Studies 1, 3 (2001), 271--295.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Silvis, J. B. Connecting Social Networks, Ridesharing, and Mobility: A Spectrum of Seniors' Behavior. ProQuest, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Steg, L. Car use: lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 39, 2 (2005), 147--162.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Steger-Vonmetz, D. C. Improving modal choice and transport efficiency with the virtual ridesharing agency. 2005. Proc. of IEEE, IEEE (2005), 994--999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Teodorović, D. and Dell'Orco, M. Mitigating traffic congestion: solving the ride-matching problem by bee colony optimization. Transportation Planning and Technology 31, 2 (2008), 135--152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Urry, J. Mobilities. Polity, Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Wash, R., Hemphill, L., and Resnick, P. Design decisions in the RideNow project. Proc. of GROUP (2005), 132--135. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Wessels, R., Pueboobpaphan, R., Bie, J., and van Arem, B. Integrating online social networks with ridesharing systems. (2010) www.pooll.nl/wpcontent/uploads/2010/02/Paperv5.pdf. Online {Last accessed on 1/01/14}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Witzel, A., and H. Reiter: The Problem-centred Interview. Qualitative Social Research. Vol. 1. No. 1. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Wulf, V., Rohde, M., Pipek, V., and Stevens, G. Engaging with practices. Proc. of CSCW (2011), 505--512. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Xing, X., Warden, T., Nicolai, T., and Herzog, O. SMIZE: a spontaneous ride-sharing system for individual urban transit. Springer (2009), 165--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Ziegler, F. and Schwanen, T. I like to go out to be energised by different people. Ageing and Society 31, 5 (2011), 758.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Social dependency and mobile autonomy: supporting older adults' mobility with ridesharing ict

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2014
      4206 pages
      ISBN:9781450324731
      DOI:10.1145/2556288

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 April 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate465of2,043submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader