skip to main content
10.1145/2559636.2559654acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Telepresence robot helps children in communicating with teachers who speak a different language

Published:03 March 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

This study reports the advantages of using a child-operated telepresence robot system for the purpose of remote education. Video conferencing is already common in educational settings, where a foreign language is taught by a native teacher from a remote location; however, there is a serious issue in that children tend to have difficulties or freeze when facing teachers who speak a different language over a monitor. We hypothesize that a child-operated telepresence robot that offers physical participation and operability will help to address this issue. To investigate this hypothesis, we conduct a field experiment with 52 participants (4-8 years old) in classroom environments, and the use of a telepresence robot system is compared with a baseline Skype condition. The results show the advantages of the telepresence robot system for both children and teachers.

References

  1. Svetlana Yarosh, Kori Inkpen, and A.J. Bernheim Brush. Video playdate: toward free play across distance. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems, pages 1251--1260, Atlanta, USA, 2010. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Sasa Junuzovic, Kori Inkpen, Tom Blank, and Anoop Gupta. Illumishare: sharing any surface. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1919--1928, Austin, USA, 2012. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Fumihide Tanaka, Toshimitsu Takahashi, and Masahiko Morita. Tricycle-style operation interface for children to control a telepresence robot. Advanced Robotics, 27(17):1375--1384, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Anybots, Inc. https://www.anybots.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. InTouch Health. http://www.intouchhealth.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. VGo Communications, Inc. http://www.vgocom.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Suitable Technologies. https://www.suitabletech.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Double Robotics. http://www.doublerobotics.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. iRobot. http://www.irobot.com/us/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Katherine M. Tsui, Munjal Desai, Holly A. Yanco, and Chris Uhlik. Exploring use cases for telepresence robots. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI 2011), pages 11--18, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2011. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jenay M. Beer and Leila Takayama. Mobile remote presence systems for older adults: acceptance, benefits, and concerns. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI 2011), pages 19--26, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2011. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Sangseok Yun, Jongju Shin, Daijin Kim, Chang Gu Kim, Munsang Kim, and Mun-Taek Choi. Engkey: Tele-education robot. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Social Robotics, pages 142--152, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Fumihide Tanaka, Toshimitsu Takahashi, Shizuko Matsuzoe, Nao Tazawa, and Masahiko Morita. Child-operated telepresence robot: a field trial connecting classrooms between Australia and Japan. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2013), pages 5896--5901, Tokyo, Japan, 2013. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Svetlana Yarosh, Stephen Cuzzort, Hendrik Müller, and Gregory D. Abowd. Developing a media space for remote synchronous parent-child interaction. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pages 97--105, Como, Italy, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Lyn Pemberton and Marcus Winter. Collaborative augmented reality in schools. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, pages 109--111, Rhodes, Greece, 2009. International Society of the Learning Sciences. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. David Birchfield, Thomas Ciufo, and Gary Minyard. SMALLab: A mediated platform for education. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Educators Program, number 33, Boston, USA, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Telepresence robot helps children in communicating with teachers who speak a different language

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            HRI '14: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction
            March 2014
            538 pages
            ISBN:9781450326582
            DOI:10.1145/2559636

            Copyright © 2014 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 3 March 2014

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            HRI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate32of132submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate242of1,000submissions,24%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader