E-government intermediaries and the challenges of access and trust

Abstract

In this article, we present the results of a study examining challenges related to access and trust for nutrition assistance outreach workers and suggest design implications for these challenges. Outreach workers are e-government intermediaries who assist clients with accessing and using e-government online applications, systems, and services. E-government intermediaries are not typical end users; they use e-government systems on behalf of clients, and as such their challenges differ from those of primary users. We detail social and technical aspects of these challenges to develop a nuanced understanding of access and trust in the ecosystems surrounding e-government systems. First, we describe how the practical accomplishment of access involves multiple stakeholders, actors, and practices. Second, we highlight how trust emerges through the e-government intermediaries’ work to project themselves as professional and competent through their technical practice. Last, we propose design implications sensitive to both the social and technical aspects of these challenges.

References

1. S. Al-Jaghoub, H. Al-Yaseen, and M. Al-Hourani. 2010. Evaluation of awareness and acceptability of using e-government services in developing countries: The case of Jordan. Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation 13, 1, 1--8.
2. F. Al-Sobhi, V. Weerakkody, and M. Albusaidy. 2010. The roles of intermediaries in the diffusion and adoption of e-government services. In Proceedings of the 16th Americas Conference on Information Systems. Paper 385.
3. F. Al-Sobhi, V. Weerakkody, and R. El-Haddadeh. 2011. The relative importance of intermediaries in egovernment adoption: A study of Saudi Arabia. In Proceedings of the 10th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference on Electronic Government. 62--74.
4. M. Awoleye, A. Oluwaranti, W. Siyanbola, and R. Adagunodo. 2008. Assessment of e-governance resource use in south-western Nigeria. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. 154--159.
5. S. Bailur. 2010. The liminal role of the information intermediary in community multimedia centres. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD’10). ACM, New York, NY, Article 5.
6. F. Bannister. 2010. Deep e-government: Beneath the carapace. In Hans J. Scholl (Ed.), E-Government: Information, Technology, and Transformation. M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY, 33--51.
7. F. Bélanger and L. Carter. 2006. The effects of the digital divide on e-government: An empirical investigation. In Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 81--88.
8. F. Bélanger and L. Carter. 2009. The impact of the digital divide on e-government use. Communications of the ACM 52, 4, 132--135.
9. F. Bélanger, J. Hiller, and W. Smith. 2002. Trustworthiness in electronic commerce: The role of privacy, security, and site attributes. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 11, 1, 245--270.
10. E. Blackstone, M. Boganno, and S. Hakim. 2005. Innovations in E-Government: The Thoughts of Governors and Mayors. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD.
11. J. Brenner. 2012. Pew Internet: Mobile. Retrieved January 10, 2014, from http://pewinternet.org/Commentary/2012/February/Pew-Internet-Mobile.aspx.
12. G. Bruno, E. Esposito, A. Genovese, and K. L. Gwebu. 2011. A critical analysis of current indexes for digital divide measurement. Information Society 27, 1, 16--28.
13. California Department of Public Health. 2013. CalFresh Outreach. Retrieved September 1, 2013, from http://www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/cpns/pages/foodstampoutreach.aspx.
14. L. Carter and F. Bélanger. 2005. The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal 5, 1, 5--25.
15. L. Carter and V. Weerakkody. 2008. E-government adoption: A cultural comparison. Information Systems Frontiers 10, 4, 473--482.
16. K. Charmaz. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage, Thousands Oaks, CA.
17. N. Chaudhri and S. S. Dash. 2007. Community information centers: E-governance at subdistrict level: A case study. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. 366--369.
18. J. Choudrie and Y. K. Dwivedi. 2005. A survey of citizens’ awareness and adoption of e-government initiatives, the ‘Government Gateway’: A United Kingdom perspective. In Proceedings of the eGovernment Workshop (eGOV’05).
19. S. Colesca and L. Dobrica. 2008. Adoption and use of e-government services: The case of Romania. Journal of Control and Computers 6, 1, 2004--2017.
20. K. Cunnyngham, L. Castner, and A. Schirm. 2010. Empirical Bayes Shrinkage Estimates of State Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participation Rates in 2005--2007 for All Eligible People and the Working Poor. Retrieved January 10, 2013, from http://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/Techpartrate2005-2007.pdf.
21. J. N. Danziger and K. L. Kraemer. 1985. Computerized databased systems and productivity among professional workers: The case of detectives. Public Administration Review 45, 1, 196--209.
22. S. S. Dawes. 2002. The Future of e-Government. Center for Technology in Government, State University of New York, Albany, NY.
23. D. V. Dimitrova and Y. C. Chen. 2006. Profiling the adopters of e-government information and services: The influence of psychological characteristics, civic mindedness, and information channels. Social Science Computer Review 24, 2, 172--188.
24. L. Dombrowski, A. Voida, G. R. Hayes, and M. Mazmanian. 2012. The labor practices of service mediation: A study of the work practices of food assistance outreach. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1977--1986.
25. D. Ellwood. 1989. Poor Support: Poverty in the American Family. Basic Books, New York, NY.
26. General Accounting Office and D. McClure. 2001. Electronic Government: Challenges Must Be Addressed with Effective Leadership and Management. Retrieved January 10, 2013, from http://www.gao.gov/assets/90/81725.pdf.
27. T. Hall and J. Owens. 2011. The digital divide and e-government services. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV’11). 37--44.
28. T. Heintze and S. Bretschneider. 2000. IT and restructuring in public organizations. Does adoption of it affect organizational structures, communications and decision making? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10, 4, 801--830.
29. N. Helbig, J. R. Gil-García, and E. Ferro. 2009. Understanding the complexity of electronic government: Implications from the digital divide literature. Government Information Quarterly 26, 89--97.
30. S. Y. Hung, C. Chang, and T. Yu. 2006. Determinants of user acceptance of the e-government services: The case of online tax filing and payment system. Government Information Quarterly 23, 97--122.
31. P. T. Jaeger and J. C. Bertot. 2010. Transparency and technological change: Ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information. Government Information Quarterly 27, 371--376.
32. J. Job. 2005. How is trust in government created? It begins at home, but ends in the parliament. Australian Review of Public Affairs 6, 1, 1--23.
33. S. King, and S. Cotterill. 2007. Transformational government? The role of information technology in delivering citizen-centric local public services. Local Government Studies 33, 3, 333--354.
34. K. Kraemer and J. King. 2006. Information technology and administrative reform: Will e-government be different? International Journal of Electronic Government Research 2, 1, 1--20.
35. S. M. Lee, X. Tan, and S. Trimi. 2005. Current practices of leading e-government countries. Communications of the ACM 48, 10, 99--104.
36. Library of Congress. 2002. E-Government Act of 2002. Retrieved January 10, 2013, from http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:H.R.02458.ENR:
37. G. Mark, B. Al-Ani, and B. Semann. 2009. Resilience through technology adoption: Merging the old and the new in Iraq. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 368--698.
38. A. Mills, L. Carter, and F. Bélanger. 2010. Conceptualizing public service value in e-government services. In Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems. Paper 346.
39. M. J. Moon. 2002. The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review 62, 4, 424--433.
40. M. J. Moon and D. Norris. 2005. Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e-government at the municipal level. Information Systems Journal 15, 1, 43--60.
41. R. M. Morgan and S. D. Hunt. 1994. The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing 58, 3, 20--38.
42. K. Mossberger. 2009. Towards digital citizenship: Addressing inequality in the information age. In A. Chadwick and P. N. Howard (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics. Taylor and Francis, New York, NY, 173--185.
43. K. Mossenburg, C. Tolbert, and M. Stansbury. 2003. Virtual Inequality: Beyond the Digital Divide. George Washington University Press, Washington, DC.
44. T. Nam and D. S. Sayogo. 2011. Who uses e-government? Examining the digital divide in e-government use. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV’11). 27--36.
45. National Association of State Chief Information Officers. 2010. 2010 Recognition Awards for Outstanding Achievement in the Field of Information Technology. Retrieved January 10, 2013, from http://www.nascio.org/awards/2010awards/.
46. M. Nord, M. Andrews, and S. Carlson. 2008. Household Food Security in the United States, 2008. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Retrieved January 10, 2013, from http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/55953/2/ERR83%20full%20doc.pdf.
47. P. Norris. 2001. Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
48. R. O’Neill. 2009. The transformative impact of e-government on public governance in New Zealand. Public Management Review 11, 6, 751--770.
49. E. Oreglia, Y. Liu, and W. Zhao. 2011. Designing for emerging rural users: Experiences from China. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’11). 1433--1436.
50. T. Parikh and K. Ghosh. 2006. Understanding and designing for intermediated information tasks in India. IEEE Pervasive Computing 5, 2, 32--39.
51. C. W. Phang, Y. Li, J. Sutanto, and A. Kankanhalli. 2005. Senior citizens’ adoption of e-government: In quest of the antecedents of perceived usefulness. In Proceedings of the 28th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 130--138.
52. W. Pieterson and J. N. Dijk. 2007. Channel choice determinants: An exploration of the factors that determine the choice of a service channel in citizen initiated contacts. In Proceedings of the 8th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Bridging Disciplines and Domains. 173--182.
53. R. D. Putnam and L. M. Feldstein. 2003. Better together. Restoring the American Community. Simon and Schuster, New York, NY.
54. F. J. Riggins and S. Dewan. 2005. The digital divide: Current and future research directions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 6, 12, 298--337.
55. N. Sambasivan, E. Cutrell, K. Toyama, and B. Nardi. 2010. Intermediated technology use in developing communities. In Proceedings of the 2010 CHI (CHI’10). ACM, New York, NY, 2583--2592.
56. B. Schneider and B. Bowen. 2010. Winning the service game: Revisiting the rules by which people co-create value. In P. Maglio, C. Kieliszewski, and J. C. Spohrer (Eds.), The Handbook of Service Science. Springer, New York, NY, 31--60.
57. B. Semann and G. Mark. 2011. Technology-mediated social arrangements to resolve breakdowns in infrastructure during ongoing disruption. ACM Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction 18, 4, Article 21.
58. J. Sherman. 2009. Those Who Work, Those Who Don’t: Poverty, Morality, and Family in Rural America. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.
59. J. Sipior, C. Ward, T. Burke, and R. Connolly. 2010. An empirical evaluation of e-government inclusion among the digitally disadvantaged in the United States. Information Resources Management Journal 23, 4, 21--39.
60. A. Sukumaran, S. Ramlal, E. Ophir, V. Kumar, G. Mishra, V. Evers, V. Balaji, and C. Nass. 2009. Intermediated technology interaction in rural contexts. In Proceedings of CHI’09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’09). ACM, New York, NY, 3817--3822.
61. J. C. Thomas and G. Streib. 2003. The new face of government: Citizen-initiated contacts in the era of e-government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13, 1, 83--102.
62. L. Torres, N. Pino, and S. Royo. 2005. E-government and the transformation of public administration in EU countries. Online Information Review 29, 5, 531--553.
63. K. Toyama. 2010. Human--computer interaction and global development. Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction 4, 1, 1--79.
64. W. Tucker and E. Blake. 2008. The role of outcome mapping in developing a rural telemedicine system. In Proceedings of IST-Africa.
65. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2012. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Retrieved November 24, 2012, from http://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/applicant_recipients/apply.htm.
66. U.S. House of Representatives. 2010. Testimony to the USHR Subcommittee on Department Operations, Oversight, Nutrition, and Forestry. Retrieved January 25, 2010, from http://democrats.agriculture.house.gov/testimony/111/h012510/Swanson.pdf.
67. M. Yildiz. 2007. E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly 24, 3, 646--665.
68. K. Zickuhr and A. Smith. 2012. Digital Differences. Retrieved March 10, 2014, from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Digital-differences.aspx.
69. N. Zillien and E. Hargittai. 2009. Digital distinction: Status-specific types of Internet usage. Social Science Quarterly 90, 2, 274--291.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Collaborative and social computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

• Social and professional topics