skip to main content
10.1145/2567948.2580063acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A fast approximation for influence maximization in large social networks

Published:07 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper deals with a novel research work about a new efficient approximation algorithm for influence maximization, which was introduced to maximize the benefit of viral marketing. For efficiency, we devise two ways of exploiting the 2-hop influence spread which is the influence spread on nodes within 2-hops away from nodes in a seed set. Firstly, we propose a new greedy method for the influence maximization problem using the 2-hop influence spread. Secondly, to speed up the new greedy method, we devise an effective way of removing unnecessary nodes for influence maximization based on optimal seed's local influence heuristics. In our experiments, we evaluate our method with real-life datasets, and compare it with recent existing methods. From experimental results, the proposed method is at least an order of magnitude faster than the existing methods in all cases while achieving similar accuracy.

References

  1. M. Cha, A. Mislove, and K. P. Gummadi. A measurement-driven analysis of information propagation in the flickr social network. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web, WWW '09, pages 721--730, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. W. Chen, C. Wang, and Y. Wang. Scalable influence maximization for prevalent viral marketing in large-scale social networks. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, KDD '10, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. W. Chen, Y. Wang, and S. Yang. Efficient influence maximization in social networks. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, KDD '09, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. P. Domingos and M. Richardson. Mining the network value of customers. In Proceedings of the seventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, KDD '01, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. Goyal, W. Lu, and L. V. Lakshmanan. Celf+: optimizing the greedy algorithm for influence maximization in social networks. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference companion on World wide web, WWW '11, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Q. Jiang, G. Song, C. Gao, Y. Wang, W. Si, and K. Xie. Simulated annealing based influence maximization in social networks. In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. K. Jung, W. Heo, and W. Chen. Irie: Scalable and robust influence maximization in social networks. In Data Mining (ICDM), 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on, pages 918--923, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. D. Kempe, J. Kleinberg, and E. Tardos. Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, KDD '03, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. Kim, S.-K. Kim, and H. Yu. Scalable and parallelizable processing of influence maximization for large-scale social networks? In Data Engineering (ICDE), 2013 IEEE 29th International Conference on, pages 266--277, April 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. H. Kwak, C. Lee, H. Park, and S. Moon. What is twitter, a social network or a news media? In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web, WWW '10, pages 591--600, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. Leskovec, A. Krause, C. Guestrin, C. Faloutsos, J. VanBriesen, and N. Glance. Cost-effective outbreak detection in networks. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, KDD '07, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. E. Sun, I. Rosenn, C. Marlow, and T. Lento. Gesundheit! modeling contagion through facebook news feed. Proc. ICWSM, 9, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Y. Wang, G. Cong, G. Song, and K. Xie. Community-based greedy algorithm for mining top-k influential nodes in mobile social networks. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, KDD '10, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A fast approximation for influence maximization in large social networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WWW '14 Companion: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web
      April 2014
      1396 pages
      ISBN:9781450327459
      DOI:10.1145/2567948

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 April 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader