skip to main content
10.1145/2576768.2598387acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Dynamic multi-dimensional PSO with indirect encoding for proportional fair constrained resource allocation

Published:12 July 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Dynamic particle swarm optimization (PSO) problems are generally characterized by the exhaustively examined issues of the changing location of optima, the changing fitness of optima, and measurement noise/errors. However, the challenging issue of continuously changing problem dimensionality has not been similarly examined. Given that in anytime dynamic resource allocation it is necessary to maintain a high quality solution, we argue that, rather than restarting the PSO algorithm, a more appropriate approach is to design an algorithm that robustly handles changing problem dimensionality. Specifically, we propose an indirect particle encoding scheme specifically designed for a dynamic multi-dimensional PSO algorithm for proportional fair constrained resource allocation. This PSO algorithm is implemented for the proportional fair allocation of power and users to channels within a simulation of an Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiple Access (OFDMA) wireless network with mobile users switching cells as they traverse the simulation environment. The proposed PSO algorithm is evaluated using simulations, which demonstrate the ability of the proposed indirect encoding scheme to maximize the overall proportional fair optimization goal, without unfairly penalizing the individual components of the solution related to newly introduced problem dimensions.

References

  1. "3GPP." Internet: www.3gpp.org, {Jan. 29, 2013}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. I. Ahmed and S. Majumder. Adaptive Resource Allocation Based on Modified Genetic Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization for Multiuser OFDM Systems. In Proc. ICECE, 211--216, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. T. Blackwell. Particle Swarm Optimization in Dynamic Environments. Springer, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. S. Borst, M. Markakis, and I. Saniee. Distributed Power Allocation and User Assignment in OFDMA Cellular Networks. In Proc. Allerton, 1055--1063, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. F. Brah, L. Vandendorpe, and J. Louveaux. OFDMA Constrained Resource Allocation with imperfect Channel Knowledge. In Proc. COM/VT, 1--5, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. A. Carlisle and G. Dozler. Tracking Changing Extrema with Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimizer. In Proc. WAC, vol.13, 265--270, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen et. al. Resource Constrained Multirobot Task Allocation with A Leader-Follower Coalition Method . In Proc. IROS, 5093--5098, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. X. Hu and R. Eberhart. Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization: Detection and Response to Dynamic Systems. In Proc. CEC, vol.2, 1666--1670, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. T. Ince, S. Kiranyaz, and M. Gabbouj. A Generic and Robust System for Automated Patient-Specific Classification of Electrocardiogram Signals. IEEE Trans. Bio-Med. Eng., 56(5):1415--1426, May 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, "Particle Swarm Optimization," in Proc. ICNN, 1995, pp. 1942--1948.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Z. Liang, Y. Chew, and C. Ko. Decentralized Bit, Subcarrier and Power Allocation with Interference Avoidance in Multicell OFDMA Systems using Game Theoretic Approach. In Proc. MILCOM, 1--7, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Y. Liu, K. Han, and D. Zhang. Consumer Sharing Policy Constrained Resource Allocation Method for Grid System . In Proc. ISCIT, 721--725, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. A. Nickabadi, M. Ebadzadeh, and R. Safabakhsh. DNPSO: A Dynamic Niching Particle Swarm Optimizer for Multi-Modal Optimization. In Proc. CEC, 26--32, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. D. Parrott and X. Li. A Particle Swarm Model for Tracking Multiple Peaks in a Dynamic Environment using Speciation. In Proc. CEC, vol.1, 98--103, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. K. Parsopoulos and M. Vrahatis. Recent approaches to global optimization problems through Particle Swarm Optimization. Natural Computing, 1:235--306, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. S. Sadeque, I. Ahmed, and R. Vaughan. Impact of Individual and Joint Optimizations in Multi-user OFDM Resource Allocation by Modified PSO. In Proc. CCECE, 1233--1237, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Sharma et. al. On the use of particle swarm optimization for adaptive resource allocation in orthogonal frequency division multiple access systems with proportional rate constraints. Info. Sci., 182(1):115--124, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. T. Starr, J.M. Cioffi, P.J. Silverman. Understanding Digital Subscriber Line Technology. Prentice Hall PTR, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. D. Tse, P. Viswanath. Fundamentals of Wireless Communications. Cambridge University Press, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. H. Wang, D. Wang, and S. Yang. Triggered Memory-Based Swarm Optimization in Dynamic Environments. In Proc. the EvoCOP, 637--646, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Y. Wang, F. Chen, and G. Wei. Adaptive Subcarrier and Bit Allocation for Multiuser OFDM System Based on Genetic Algorithm. In Proc. ICC, vol.1, 242--246, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. S. Yang. Population-Based Incremental Learning with Memory Scheme for Changing Environments. In Proc. the GECCO, 711--718, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. S. Yang and X. Yao. Population-Based Incremental Learning With Associative Memory for Dynamic Environments. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 542--561, October 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Y. Yi, Z. Yu, and W. Ye. Modified Particle Swarm Optimization and Genetic Algorithm Based Adaptive Resources Allocation Algorithm for Multiuser Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing System. Information Technology, 10(5):955--964, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Young et. al. Energy-Constrained Dynamic Resource Allocation in a Heterogeneous Computing Environment. In Proc. ICPPW, 298--307, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. S. Zilberstein and S. Russell. Approximate Reasoning Using Anytime Algorithms. In S. Natarajan, editor, Imprecise and Approximate Computation, 43--62. Springer US, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Dynamic multi-dimensional PSO with indirect encoding for proportional fair constrained resource allocation

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          GECCO '14: Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
          July 2014
          1478 pages
          ISBN:9781450326629
          DOI:10.1145/2576768

          Copyright © 2014 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 12 July 2014

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          GECCO '14 Paper Acceptance Rate180of544submissions,33%Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

          Upcoming Conference

          GECCO '24
          Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
          July 14 - 18, 2024
          Melbourne , VIC , Australia
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader