skip to main content
10.1145/2596695.2596697acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesw4aConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evaluation of DysWebxia: a reading app designed for people with dyslexia

Published:07 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we present the evaluation of DysWebxia, a reading app for iOS devices, specially designed for people with dyslexia. DysWebxia integrates previous results about the best way to present text for people with dyslexia together with a unique feature, the ability to show synonyms on demand for complex words. Although the new algorithm used for this unique feature is language independent, our first prototype is for Spanish. To evaluate DysWebxia we carried out two different user studies. One to evaluate the quality of the synonyms on demand that included 32 participants with dyslexia and 38 strong readers without dyslexia, and another one to evaluate the usability of the app based on 12 participants. Our results show that the quality of the synonyms generated by the new algorithm outperforms a frequency based baseline, and that the participants found DysWebxia very usable. Therefore, we show that this app may have in the future a large impact for people with dyslexia.

References

  1. S. M. Aluísio and C. Gasperin. Fostering digital inclusion and accessibility: the PorSimples project for simplification of Portuguese texts. In Proc. NAACL HLT '10 Workshop YIW CALA '10, pages 46--53, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. R. Baeza-Yates, L. Rello, and J. Dembowski. CASSA (Context Aware Synonym Simplification Algorithm), 2014. In preparation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. O. Biran, S. Brody, and N. Elhadad. Putting it simply: a context-aware approach to lexical simplification. In Proc. ACL '11, pages 496--501, Portland, Oregon, USA, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. S. Bott, L. Rello, B. Drndarevic, and H. Saggion. Can Spanish be simpler? LexSiS: Lexical simplification for Spanish. In Proc. Coling '12, Mumbay, India, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. J. Burstein, J. Shore, J. Sabatini, Y.-W. Lee, and M. Ventura. The automated text adaptation tool. (demo). In Proc. NAACL '07, pages 3--4, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. B. Caldwell, M. Cooper, L. G. Reid, and G. Vanderheiden. Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. WWW Consortium (W3C), 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. J. Carifio and R. Perla. Resolving the 50-year debate around using and misusing Likert scales. Medical education, 42(12):1150--1152, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. M. S. Carrillo, J. Alegría, P. Miranda, and S. Pérez. Evaluación de la dislexia en la escuela primaria: Prevalencia en español (Evaluation of dyslexia in primary school: The prevalence in Spanish). Escritos de Psicología (Psychology Writings), 4(2):35--44, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. S. Devlin and G. Unthank. Helping aphasic people process online information. In Proc. ASSETS '06, pages 225--226. ACM, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A. Dickinson, P. Gregor, and A. Newell. Ongoing investigation of the ways in which some of the problems encountered by some dyslexics can be alleviated using computer techniques. In Proc. ASSETS'02, pages 97--103, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. F. Enguita, L. M. Martínez, and J. R. Gómez. Fracaso y abandono escolar en España (School Failure in Spain). Obra Social, Fundación la Caixa, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. P. Gregor, A. Dickinson, A. Macaffer, and P. Andreasen. Seeword: a personal word processing environment for dyslexic computer users. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3):341--355, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. P. Gregor and A. F. Newell. An empirical investigation of ways in which some of the problems encountered by some dyslexics may be alleviated using computer techniques. In Proc. ASSETS'00, ASSETS 2000, pages 85--91, New York, NY, USA, 2000. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Hyönä and R. Olson. Eye fixation patterns among dyslexic and normal readers: Effects of word length and word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(6):1430, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Interagency Commission on Learning Disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Report to the U.S. Congress. Government Printing Office, Washington DC, U.S., 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. J. E. Jiménez, R. Guzmán, C. Rodríguez, and C. Artiles. Prevalencia de las dificultades específicas de aprendizaje: La dislexia en español (the prevalence of specific learning difficulties: Dyslexia in Spanish). Anales de Psicología (Annals of Psychology), 25(1):78--85, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. G. Kanvinde, L. Rello, and R. Baeza-Yates. IDEAL: a dyslexic-friendly e-book reader (poster). In Proc. ASSETS'12, pages 205--206, Boulder, USA, October 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. C. Lewis. Using the "thinking-aloud" method in cognitive interface design. IBM TJ Watson Research Center, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Y. Lin, J.-B. Michel, E. L. Aiden, J. Orwant, W. Brockman, and S. Petrov. Syntactic annotations for the Google books ngram corpus. (demonstration). In Proc. ACL'12, pages 169--174, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. R. Mitkov, L. A. Ha, A. Varga, and L. Rello. Semantic similarity of distractors in multiple-choice tests: extrinsic evaluation. In Proc. EACL Workshop GeMS '09, pages 49--56, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. J. Nielsen and T. K. Landauer. A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. In Proc. INTERCHI'93, pages 206--213. ACM, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. J. Nielsen and R. Molich. Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In Proc. SIGCHI'90, pages 249--256, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. R. K. Olson and B. W. Wise. Reading on the computer with orthographic and speech feedback. Reading and Writing, 4(2):107--144, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. H. Petrie, G. Weber, and W. Fisher. Personalization, interaction, and navigation in rich multimedia documents for print-disabled users. IBM Systems Journal, 44(3):629--635, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. L. Rello and R. Baeza-Yates. Lexical quality as a proxy for web text understandability (poster). In Proc. WWW '12, pages 591--592, Lyon, France, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. L. Rello and R. Baeza-Yates. Good fonts for dyslexia. In Proc. ASSETS'13, Bellevue, Washington, USA, 2013. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. L. Rello, R. Baeza-Yates, S. Bott, and H. Saggion. Simplify or help? Text simplification strategies for people with dyslexia. In Proc. W4A '13, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. L. Rello, R. Baeza-Yates, L. Dempere, and H. Saggion. Frequent words improve readability and short words improve understandability for people with dyslexia. In Proc. INTERACT '13, Cape Town, South Africa, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. L. Rello, R. Baeza-Yates, H. Saggion, C. Bayarri, and S. D. J. Barbosa. An iOS reader for people with dyslexia (demo). In Proc. ASSETS'13, Bellevue, Washington, USA, 2013. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. L. Rello, S. Bautista, R. Baeza-Yates, P. Gervás, R. Hervás, and H. Saggion. One half or 50%? An eye-tracking study of number representation readability. In Proc. INTERACT '13, Cape Town, South Africa, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. L. Rello, G. Kanvinde, and R. Baeza-Yates. Layout guidelines for web text and a web service to improve accessibility for dyslexics. In Proc. W4A '12, Lyon, France, 2012. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. L. Rello, G. Kanvinde, and R. Baeza-Yates. A mobile application for displaying more accessible ebooks to dyslexics. In DSAI 2012, Douro, Portugal, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. L. Rello, M. Pielot, M. C. Marcos, and R. Carlini. Size matters (spacing not): 18 points for a dyslexic-friendly Wikipedia. In Proc. W4A '13, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. J. Rüsseler, S. Probst, S. Johannes, and T. Münte. Recognition memory for high-and low-frequency words in adult normal and dyslexic readers: an event-related brain potential study. Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology, 25(6):815--829, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. V. F. Santana, R. Oliveira, L. Almeida, and M. Ito. Firefixia: An accessibility web browser customization toolbar for people with dyslexia. In Proc. W4A '13, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. L. Specia, S. K. Jauhar, and R. Mihalcea. Semeval-2012 task 1: English lexical simplification. In Proceedings of the First Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics, pages 347--355, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. V. Topac. The development of a text customization tool for existing web sites. In Text Customization for Readability Symposium, November 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. M. Yatskar, B. Pang, C. Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, and L. Lee. For the sake of simplicity: Unsupervised extraction of lexical simplifications from Wikipedia. In Proc. ACL '10, pages 365--368, Uppsala, Sweden, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. M. Zorzi, C. Barbiero, A. Facoettia, I. Lonciari, M. Carrozzi, M. Montico, L. Bravar, F. George, C. Pech-Georgel, and J. Ziegler. Extra-large letter spacing improves reading in dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109:11455--11459, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    W4A '14: Proceedings of the 11th Web for All Conference
    April 2014
    192 pages
    ISBN:9781450326513
    DOI:10.1145/2596695

    Copyright © 2014 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 7 April 2014

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    W4A '14 Paper Acceptance Rate6of14submissions,43%Overall Acceptance Rate171of371submissions,46%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader