skip to main content
10.1145/2596695.2596721acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesw4aConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Predictive, accessible web automation: a longitudinal study

Published:07 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

The problem of efficient, usable non-visual web access remains inadequately solved, despite its critical importance to a significant number of visually-impaired existing and potential Web users. Web automation, a process of automating browsing actions on behalf of the user, has the potential to significantly improve the usability and accessibility of non-visual web browsing. Automation Assistant is an accessible web automation system designed specifically for this purpose. Until now, however, Automation Assistant was only evaluated in a short-term, controlled experiment. In this paper we report preliminary results on a longitudinal study designed to explore the long term practicality of the approach to accessible web automation taken by Automation Assistant. The study involves a single participant and can be considered a pilot of a future experiment involving a large number of participants and benefiting from the lessons learned during the pilot.

References

  1. Freedom Scientific: JAWS screen-reader. www.freedomscientific.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. NonVisual Desktop Access: NVDA screen-reader. www.nvda-project.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. J. P. Bigham, et al. Trailblazer: enabling blind users to blaze trails through the web. In IUI '09, pages 177--186, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Y. Borodin, et al. Universal and ubiquitous web access with Capti. In W4A '12, pages 27:1--27:2, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. Brooke. SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, A. Thomas, B. Weerdmeester, and I. McClelland, editors, Usability evaluation in industry. Taylor and Francis, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. I. Li, et al. Here's what i did: sharing and reusing web activity with actionshot. In CHI '10, pages 723--732, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. H. Lieberman. Autonomous interface agents. In CHI '97, pages 67--74, New York, NY, USA, 1997. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Y. Puzis, et al. Predictive web automation assistant for people with vision impairments. In WWW '13, pages 1031--1040, Geneva, Switzerland, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Predictive, accessible web automation: a longitudinal study

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        W4A '14: Proceedings of the 11th Web for All Conference
        April 2014
        192 pages
        ISBN:9781450326513
        DOI:10.1145/2596695

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 April 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        W4A '14 Paper Acceptance Rate6of14submissions,43%Overall Acceptance Rate171of371submissions,46%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader