Knowledge sharing for common understanding of technical specifications through artifactual culture

ABSTRACT

Context: Software engineering is a knowledge intensive activity that is supported by documenting and sharing the required knowledge through a wide variety of artifacts. Global Software Development (GSD) teams heavily rely on artifacts as a vital means of knowledge sharing. However, there is little empirical knowledge about the key reasons and practices of using artifacts in GSD for knowledge sharing to support common understanding of technical specifications. Objective: This study aims at empirically studying the key motivators, practices, and drawbacks of artifact-based knowledge sharing for achieving common understanding of technical specifications in the context of GSD. Method: We conducted an exploratory case study in an organization that was involved in several GSD projects. Results: Our findings revealed the key challenges that necessitated the use of artifacts for sharing technical specification knowledge. We also present the practices that make up the artifact-based knowledge sharing system in the studied case. Finally, we shed some light on the caveats of knowledge sharing practices adopted by the studied company. The findings can provide useful insights into the artifact-based knowledge sharing practices and how it can be complemented by having certain level of social ties among distributed team members, even through asynchronous means.

References

1. G. Garousi, V. Garousi, M. Moussavi, G. Ruhe, and B. Smith, "Evaluating usage and quality of technical software documentation: an empirical study." pp. 24--35.
2. C. Treude, and M. A. Storey, "Effective communication of software development knowledge through community portals." pp. 91--101.
3. I. Sommerville, Software engineering: Addison-Wesley, 2007.
4. M. Ali Babar, and C. Lescher, "Global software engineering: Identifying challenges is important and providing solutions is even better," Information and Software Technology, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 1--5, 2014.
5. D. E. Damian, and D. Zowghi, "RE challenges in multi-site software development organizations," Requirements Engineering, vol. 8, no. Copyright 2004, IEE, pp. 149--60, 2003.
6. D. Damian, "Stakeholders in global requirements engineering: Lessons learned from practice," Software, IEEE, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 21--27, 2007.
7. J. Kotlarsky, and I. Oshri, "Social ties, knowledge sharing and successful collaboration in globally distributed system development projects," European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 14, no. 1, 2005.
8. P. J. Hinds, and S. P. Weisband, "Knowledge sharing and shared understanding in virtual teams," Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness, pp. 21--36, 2003.
9. I. Rus, and M. Lindvall, "Knowledge management in software engineering," Software, IEEE, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 26--38, 2002.
10. A. Aurum, F. Daneshgar, and J. Ward, "Investigating Knowledge Management practices in software development organisations - An Australian experience," Information and Software Technology, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 511--533, 2008.
11. I. Nonaka, "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation," Organization Science, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 14--37, 1994.
12. M. Hansen, N. Nohria, and T. Tierney, "What is your strategy for managing knowledge," The knowledge management yearbook, vol. 2001, pp. 55--69, 2000.
13. C. Manteli, B. van den Hooff, A. Tang, and H. van Vliet, "The Impact of Multi-site Software Governance on Knowledge Management." pp. 40--49.
14. A. Boden, G. Avram, L. Bannon, and V. Wulf, "Knowledge Management in Distributed Software Development Teams - Does Culture Matter?." pp. 18--27.
15. A. Davis, and D. Khazanchi, "Does mutual knowledge affect virtual team performance? Theoretical analysis and anecdotal evidence," American Journal of Business, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 57--66, 2007.
16. P. J. Hinds, and M. Mortensen, "Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication," Organization science, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 290--307, 2005.
17. I. Oshri, J. Kotlarsky, and L. Willcocks, "Missing links: building critical social ties for global collaborative teamwork," Commun. ACM, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 76--81, 2008.
18. M. Hertzum, "Six roles of documents in professional's work." pp. 41--60.
19. J. L. Krein, P. Wagstrom, S. M. S. Jr, C. Williams, and C. D. Knutson, "The Problem of Private Information in Large Software Organizations," in ICSSP, 2011, pp. 218--222.
20. H. Tellioglu, and I. Wagner, "Software cultures," Communications of the ACM, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 71--77, 1999.
21. M. Cataldo, M. Bass, J. D. Herbsleb, and L. Bass, "On Coordination Mechanisms in Global Software Development." pp. 71--80.
22. R. Yin, Case study research: Design and methods: Sage Publications, Inc., 2003.
23. V. Braun, and V. Clarke, "Using thematic analysis in psychology," Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, 2006.
24. J. M. Corbin, and A. Strauss., "Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria," Qualitative Sociology, no. 13, 1990.
25. B. Curtis, H. Krasner, and N. Iscoe, "A field study of the software design process for large systems," Commun. ACM, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 1268--1287, 1988.
26. C. D. Cramton, and K. L. Orvis, "Overcoming barriers to information sharing in virtual teams," Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness, pp. 214--230, 2003.

Index Terms

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Management of computing and information systems

      • Project and people management

• Software and its engineering

  • Software creation and management

    • Software development process management

  • Software notations and tools

    • Software configuration management and version control systems