skip to main content
10.1145/2602044.2602051acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagese-energyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

NILMTK: an open source toolkit for non-intrusive load monitoring

Published:11 June 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Non-intrusive load monitoring, or energy disaggregation, aims to separate household energy consumption data collected from a single point of measurement into appliance-level consumption data. In recent years, the field has rapidly expanded due to increased interest as national deployments of smart meters have begun in many countries. However, empirically comparing disaggregation algorithms is currently virtually impossible. This is due to the different data sets used, the lack of reference implementations of these algorithms and the variety of accuracy metrics employed. To address this challenge, we present the Non-intrusive Load Monitoring Toolkit (NILMTK); an open source toolkit designed specifically to enable the comparison of energy disaggregation algorithms in a reproducible manner. This work is the first research to compare multiple disaggregation approaches across multiple publicly available data sets. Our toolkit includes parsers for a range of existing data sets, a collection of preprocessing algorithms, a set of statistics for describing data sets, two reference benchmark disaggregation algorithms and a suite of accuracy metrics. We demonstrate the range of reproducible analyses which are made possible by our toolkit, including the analysis of six publicly available data sets and the evaluation of both benchmark disaggregation algorithms across such data sets.

References

  1. G. W. Hart. Nonintrusive appliance load monitoring. Proceedings of the IEEE, 80(12):1870--1891, 1992. doi:10.1109/5.192069.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. S. Darby. The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption. A Review for DEFRA of the Literature on Metering, Billing and direct Displays, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. California Public Utilities Commission. Final Opinion Authorizing Pacific Gas and Electric Company to Deploy Advanced Metering Infrastructure. Technical report, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Department of Energy & Climate Change. Smart Metering Equipment Technical Specifications Version 2. Technical report, UK, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. J. Z. Kolter and M. J. Johnson. REDD: A public data set for energy disaggregation research. In Proceedings of 1st KDD Workshop on Data Mining Applications in Sustainability, San Diego, CA, USA, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. K. Anderson, A. Ocneanu, D. Benitez, D. Carlson, A. Rowe, and M. Bergés. BLUED: A fully labeled public dataset for Event-Based Non-Intrusive load monitoring research. In Proceedings of 2nd KDD Workshop on Data Mining Applications in Sustainability, pages 12--16, Beijing, China, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. S. Barker, A. Mishra, D. Irwin, E. Cecchet, P. Shenoy, and J. Albrecht. Smart*: An open data set and tools for enabling research in sustainable homes. In Proceedings of 2nd KDD Workshop on Data Mining Applications in Sustainability, Beijing, China, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. A. L. Goldberger, L. A. Amaral, L. Glass, J. M. Hausdorff, P. C. Ivanov, R. G. Mark, J. E. Mietus, G. B. Moody, C.-K. Peng, and H. E. Stanley. PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals. Circulation, 101(23):e215--e220, 2000. doi:10.1161/01.cir.101.23.e215.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. D. Kotz and T. Henderson. Crawdad: A community resource for archiving wireless data at dartmouth. Pervasive Computing, IEEE, 4(4):12--14, 2005. doi:10.1109/MPRV.2005.75. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, and E. Duchesnay. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12:2825--2830, 2011. arXiv:1201.0490. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. H. Kim, M. Marwah, M. F. Arlitt, G. Lyon, and J. Han. Unsupervised Disaggregation of Low Frequency Power Measurements. In Proceedings of 11th SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, pages 747--758, Mesa, AZ, USA, 2011. doi:10.1137/1.9781611972818.64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. K. C. Armel, A. Gupta, G. Shrimali, and A. Albert. Is disaggregation the holy grail of energy efficiency? The case of electricity. Energy Policy, 52:213--234, 2013. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.062.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. C. Holcomb. Pecan Street Inc.: A Test-bed for NILM. In International Workshop on Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. J.-P. Zimmermann, M. Evans, J. Griggs, N. King, L. Harding, P. Roberts, and C. Evans. Household Electricity Survey. A study of domestic electrical product usage. Technical Report R66141, DEFRA, May 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. S. Makonin, F. Popowich, L. Bartram, B. Gill, and I. V. Bajic. AMPds: A Public Dataset for Load Disaggregation and Eco-Feedback Research. In IEEE Electrical Power and Energy Conference, Halifax, NS, Canada, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. N. Batra, M. Gulati, A. Singh, and M. B. Srivastava. It's Different: Insights into home energy consumption in India. In Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Workshop on Embedded Sensing Systems for Energy-Efficiency in Buildings, 2013. doi:10.1145/2528282.2528293. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J. Kelly and W. Knottenbelt. UK-DALE: A dataset recording UK Domestic Appliance-Level Electricity demand and whole-house demand. ArXiv e-prints, 2014. arXiv:1404.0284.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. J. Z. Kolter and T. Jaakkola. Approximate Inference in Additive Factorial HMMs with Application to Energy Disaggregation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 1472--1482, La Palma, Canary Islands, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. M. Zeifman. Disaggregation of home energy display data using probabilistic approach. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 58(1):23--31, 2012. doi:10.1109/TCE.2012.6170051.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. M. J. Johnson and A. S. Willsky. Bayesian Nonparametric Hidden Semi-Markov Models. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 14:673--701, 2013. arXiv:1203.1365. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. O. Parson, S. Ghosh, M. Weal, and A. Rogers. Non-intrusive load monitoring using prior models of general appliance types. In Proceedings of the 26th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 356--362, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. D. Rahayu, B. Narayanaswamy, S. Krishnaswamy, C. Labbe, and D. P. Seetharam. Learning to be energy-wise: Discriminative methods for load disaggregation. In 3rd International Conference on Future Energy Systems, pages 1--4, 2012. doi:10.1145/2208828.2208838. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. N. Batra, H. Dutta, and A. Singh. INDiC: Improved Non-Intrusive load monitoring using load Division and Calibration. In International Conference of Machine Learning and Applications, Miami, FL, USA, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. K. Anderson, M. Berges, A. Ocneanu, D. Benitez, and J. Moura. Event detection for non intrusive load monitoring. In Proceedings of 38th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, pages 3312--3317, 2012. doi:10.1109/IECON.2012.6389367.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Y. Low, J. Gonzalez, A. Kyrola, D. Bickson, C. Guestrin, and J. M. Hellerstein. Graphlab: A new parallel framework for machine learning. In Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Catalina Island, CA, USA, 2010. arXiv:1006.4990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. NILMTK: an open source toolkit for non-intrusive load monitoring

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      e-Energy '14: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Future energy systems
      June 2014
      326 pages
      ISBN:9781450328197
      DOI:10.1145/2602044

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 June 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      e-Energy '14 Paper Acceptance Rate23of112submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate160of446submissions,36%

      Upcoming Conference

      E-Energy '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader