In front of and behind the second screen: viewer and producer perspectives on a companion app

ABSTRACT

The growing success of tablets and smartphones has shifted the focus of the interactive TV industry to the introduction of second screen applications. One example is second screen companion apps that offer extra information about a television program, often synchronized with what happens on screen. In this paper, we investigate a second screen companion app, from the perspective of the viewers and producers of such apps. Based on observations and interviews with viewers and producers, and actual usage data of a companion app from Google Analytics, we present several insights and recommendations for how to design companion apps related to ease of use, timing, social interaction, attention and added value.

References

1. Basapur, S., Mandalia, H., Chaysinh, S., Lee, Y., Venkitaraman, N., & Metcalf, C. (2012). FANFEEDS: Evaluation of Socially Generated Information Feed on Second Screen As a TV Show Companion. In Proc. of the 10th European Conf. on Interactive TV and Video (pp. 87--96). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
2. Cesar, P., Bulterman, D. C., & Jansen, A. J. (2008). Usages of the Secondary Screen in an Interactive Television Environment: Control, Enrich, Share, and Transfer Television Content. In Proc. of the 6th European Conf. on Changing Television Environments (pp. 168--177). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
3. Cauberghe, V., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2006). Opportunities and thresholds of advertising on interactive digital TV: a view from advertising professionals. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 7(1), 21--37.
4. Cruickshank, L., Tsekleves, E., Whitham, R., & Hill, A. (2007). Making Interactive TV Easier To Use: Interface Design For A Second Screen Approach. The Design Journal, 10(3).
5. Darnell, M. J. (2007). How Do People Really Interact with TV?: Naturalistic Observations of Digital TV and Digital Video Recorder Users. Comput. Entertain., 5(2).
6. Holmes, M. E., Josephson, S., & Carney, R. E. (2012). Visual Attention to Television Programs with a Secondscreen Application. In Proc. of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (pp. 397--400). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
7. Jensen, J. F. (2005). Interactive Television: New Genres, New Format, New Content. In Proceedings of the Second Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment (pp. 89--96). Sydney, Australia, Australia: Creativity & Cognition Studios Press.
8. Lochrie, M., & Coulton, P. (2012). Sharing the Viewing Experience Through Second Screens. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video (pp. 199--202). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
9. Murray, J., Goldenberg, S., Agarwal, K., Chakravorty, T., Cutrell, J., Doris-Down, A., & Kothandaraman, H. (2012). Story-map: iPad Companion for Long Form TV Narratives. In Proc. of the 10th European Conf. on Interactive TV and Video (pp. 223--226). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
10. Robertson, S., Wharton, C., Ashworth, C., & Franzke, M. (1996). Dual Device User Interface Design: PDAs and Interactive Television. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 79--86). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
11. Ursu, M. F., Thomas, M., Kegel, I., Williams, D., Tuomola, M., Lindstedt, I., & Hall, N. (2008). Interactive TV Narratives: Opportunities, Progress, and Challenges. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl., 4(4), 25:1--25:39.
12. van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Vos, L. (2001). Searching for the Holy Grail Images of Interactive Television. New Media & Society, 3(4), 443--465.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

• Information systems

  • Information systems applications

    • Multimedia information systems