skip to main content
10.1145/2612733.2612744acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The use of smart work in Korea: who and for what?

Published: 18 June 2014 Publication History

Abstract

The smart work refers to an alternative way to organize work by using ICTs, which allows employees to undertake their duties anytime and anywhere. The potential benefits of smart work involve the improvement of efficiency and achievement of balance between work and life. The purposes of this study are (1) to examine the specific characteristics of the smart work users and the level of their intention to use of smart work and (2) to analyze the 'driver' and 'constraint' factors that influence on intention to use and actual use behavior of smart work in Korea. To fulfill these purposes, the authors describe the characteristics of smart work users and analyze the causal relationship among various kinds of driver and constraint factors, the intention to use, and the use behavior of smart work with the first nation-wide survey data on smart work in Korea. Major findings of this research are as follows. First, the level of the diffusion of smart work seems to be low in terms of the number of the users of smart work. However, younger workers who have lower rank and shorter job tenure, and workers in quasi-governmental organizations show relatively high level of the intention to use of smart work as well as actually use it more frequently than other employee groups. Second, the perceived cost of commuting and travelling, the expected benefits of using smart work, and the institutional and technological supports have positive effect on smart work adoption of public employees. In contrast, the expected disadvantage of using smart work and organizational culture and management unfriendly to smart work have a negative effect on the use of smart work. Moreover, the authors find that the intention to use of smart work has mediation effect in the relationship between the drivers/constraints and the use behavior of smart work. Based on these results, theoretical and policy implications for the promotion of smart work are presented.

References

[1]
Bailey, D. A., and Kurland, N. B. 2002. A review of telework research: findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 383--400.
[2]
Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. 1986. The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), pp.1173--1182.
[3]
Blackstone, E. A., Bognanno, M. L. and Hakim, S. eds. 2005. Innovations in E-Government: The Thoughts of Governors and Mayors. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Pub.
[4]
Bostrom, R. P., and Heinen, J. S. 1977. MIS Problems and failures: A Socio-Technical Perspective. Part 1: The Causes. MIS Quarterly, 1(3),17--32.
[5]
Davis, F. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived east of use interface, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319--40.
[6]
del Aguila Orba, A. R., Cámara, S. B., and Meléndez, A. R. 2002. The economic and organizational aspects of telecentres: the Spanish case, Technovation, 22, 785--798.
[7]
Dunleavy, P. 2007. Governance and state organization in the digital era. In Mansell, R., Avgerou, C., Quah, D., & Silverstone, R. 2007 The Oxford Handbook of Information andCommunication Technologies.
[8]
Gil-Garcia, J. R. 2012. Enacting electronic government success: An Inte6grative Study of Government-wide Websites, Organizational Capabilities, and Institutions. Springer, NY.
[9]
Hood, C. 1991. The Hidden Public Sector: The Quangocratization of the world. In F. X. Kaufman (ed.) The Public Sector: Challenge for Coordination and Learning. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
[10]
Jones, M. and Orlikowski, W. J. 2009. Information technology and the dynamics of organizational change. In Mansell, R. et al.(eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Information and Communication Technology. Oxford. Univ. Press.
[11]
Kim, Y. K. 2012. An Integrated Theoretical Model on the Relationships the Related Factors of the Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Korean Industrial Economics and Business, 25(2), pp.1639--1670.
[12]
Kowalski, B. K. and Swanson A. J. 2005. Critical success factors in developing teleworking programs. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 12(3). 236--249.
[13]
Lee, H. C., Yi, J. H., and Sohn, K. W. 2011. Smart work security threat and solutions. Journal of the Korea Institute of Information Security & Cryptology, 21(3), 12--21.
[14]
Lee, S. C. 2013. A study on the relationship between organizational culture, learning organization, and organizational effectiveness in public institutions, Journal of Korean Public Administration Review, 46(4), 181--205.
[15]
Leung, L. 2004. Societal, organizational and individual factors in the adoption of telework. In P. Lee, L. Leung, & C. Y. K. So (Eds.), Impact and issues in news media: Toward intelligent societies (pp. 149--171). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
[16]
Martínez-Sánchez, A., Pérez-Pérez, M., Vela-Jiménez, M. J., & de-Luis-Carnicer, P. 2007. Telework adoption, change management, and firm performance, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 21(1), 7--31.
[17]
Moen, P. 1996 A life course perspective on retirement, gender, and well-being, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1(2), 131--44.
[18]
Mokhtarian, P. L., and Salomon, I. 1997. Modeling the Desire to Telecommute: The Importance of Attitudinal Factors in Behavioral Models. Transportation Research, 31(1), 35--50.
[19]
Neirott, P., Paolucci, E., and Raguseo, E. 2013. Mapping the antecedents of telework diffusion: firm-level evidence from Italy, New Technology, Work and Employment, 28(1), 16--36.
[20]
Olorunfemi, A O. 2013. Telecommuting to Improve Quality of Worklife of Women Wokers in Lagos State Tertiary Institutions, Journal of Studies in Education, 3(2), 222--33.
[21]
Pérez, M., Martínez, A. and de Luis, P. 2003. The organizational implications of human resources managers' perception of teleworking, Personnel Review, 32(6), 733--55.
[22]
Pérez, M. P., Sánchez, A. M., and de-Luis-Carnicer, M. P. 2002. Benefits and barriers of telework: perception differences of human resources managers according to company's operations strategy, technovation 22, 775--83.
[23]
Pérez, M. P., Sánchez, A. M., and de-Luis-Carnicer, M. P. 2004. A Technology Acceptance Model of Innovation Adoption: The Case of Teleworking. European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(4), pp.280--291.
[24]
Robertson, M. M., Schleifer, L. W., and Huang, Y. 2012. Examining the macroergonomics and safety factors among teleworkers: Development of a conceptual model. Work, 41, pp.2611--2614.
[25]
Sung, W. J. 2013. A study on the activation plan of smart work in public sector, Journal of information society policy, 20(3), 43--62. National Information society Agency, Korea.
[26]
Yen, J. R. and Mahmassani, H. S. 1994. The Telecommuting Adoption Process: Conceptual Framework and Model Development, Center for Transportation Research, Austin, TX.
[27]
Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. 2000. A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: four longitudinal field studies, Management Science, 46(2), 186--204.
[28]
Wicks, D. 2002. Successfully increasing technological control through minimizing workplace resistance: understanding the willingness to telework, Management Decision, 40(7), 672--681.
[29]
Wilson, J. Q. 2000. Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. Basic Books, Inc.
[30]
West, D. M. 2004. E-Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes. Public Admin Rev, 64 (1), 15--27.
[31]
Wicks, D. 2002. Successfully increasing technological control through minimizing workplace resistance: understanding the willingness to telework. Management Decision, 40(7), pp.672--681.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)How to Enhance Smart Work Effectiveness as a Sustainable HRM Practice in the Tourism IndustrySustainability10.3390/su1404221814:4(2218)Online publication date: 15-Feb-2022
  • (2015)From Bottom-up Insights to Feature Ideas: A Case Study into the Office Environments of Older Knowledge WorkersHuman Work Interaction Design. Work Analysis and Interaction Design Methods for Pervasive and Smart Workplaces10.1007/978-3-319-27048-7_6(83-96)Online publication date: 9-Dec-2015

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
dg.o '14: Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research
June 2014
365 pages
ISBN:9781450329019
DOI:10.1145/2612733
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • Digital Government Society of North America

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 18 June 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. adoption of ICT
  2. smart work
  3. smart work policy

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

dg.o '14
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

dg.o '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 36 of 62 submissions, 58%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 150 of 271 submissions, 55%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 07 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)How to Enhance Smart Work Effectiveness as a Sustainable HRM Practice in the Tourism IndustrySustainability10.3390/su1404221814:4(2218)Online publication date: 15-Feb-2022
  • (2015)From Bottom-up Insights to Feature Ideas: A Case Study into the Office Environments of Older Knowledge WorkersHuman Work Interaction Design. Work Analysis and Interaction Design Methods for Pervasive and Smart Workplaces10.1007/978-3-319-27048-7_6(83-96)Online publication date: 9-Dec-2015

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media