skip to main content
10.1145/2617995.2617996acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmocoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Choreography as Mediated through Compositional Tools for Movement: Constructing A Historical Perspective

Authors Info & Claims
Published:16 June 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Choreography is the art of crafting movement, developed through a long history of techniques. Like other compositional processes, choreography is a complex creative process that explores a variety of formal procedures that can result in unique artistic creations. Current computational systems for assisting choreography tend to be idiosyncratic, with emphasis on different feature sets of the compositional process (including movement, structure or expression). In this paper we examine existing technological systems for supporting choreography and group them by their purpose: reflection, generation, real-time interaction, and annotation. We then analyze these system features using Laban Movement Analysis, a comprehensive language for movement description, representation, expression and performance. Our paper articulates the relative benefits of these systems based on experiential aspects of choreography, and posits future directions of intelligent systems for supporting and partnering with choreography.

References

  1. Bermudez, B., DeLahunta, S., Hoogenboom, M., Ziegler, C., Bevilacqua, F., Fdili Alaoui, S., and Meneses Gutierrez, B. The Double Skin/Double Mind Interactive Installation. The Journal for Artistic Research JAR (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bradford, J., and Côté-Laurence, P. An application of artificial intelligence to the choreography of dance. Computers and the Humanities 29, 4 (1995), 233--240.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Brand, M., and Hertzmann, A. Style machines. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Annual Conference Series, ACM SIGGRAPH (2000), 183--192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Cabral, D., Carvalho, U., Silva, J., Valente, J., Fernandes, C., and Correia, N. Multimodal video annotation for contemporary dance creation. In Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2011), 2293--2298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Camurri, A., Hashimoto, S., and Ricchetti, M. Eyesweb: Toward gesture and affect recognition in interactive dance and music systems. Computer Music journal volume 24, 1 (2000), pages 57--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Candy, L. Constraints and Creativity in the Digital Arts. Leonardo 40, 4 (2007), 366--367.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Carlson, K., Schiphorst, T., and Pasquier, P. Scuddle: Generating Movement Catalysts for Computer-Aided Choreography. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Computational Creativity (2011), 123--128.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlson, K., Schiphorst, T., and Shaw, C. ActionPlot: a visualization tool for contemporary dance analysis. Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization, and Imaging 1 (2011), 113--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Carroll, E., Lottridge, D., and Latulipe, C. Bodies in critique: a technological intervention in the dance production process. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-supported cooperative work (2012), 705--714. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Corness, G., and Schiphorst, T. Performing with a system's intention: embodied cues in performer-system interaction. Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on... (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. DeLahunta, S. Software for dancers: coding forms. Performance Research journal 7, 2 (2002), 96--102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. DeLahunta, S. Capturing intention: documentation, analysis and notation research based on the work of Emio Greco | PC. Emio Greco | PC and Amsterdam School of the Arts, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. DeLahunta, S., and Shaw, N. Z. Choreographic Resources Agents, Archives, Scores and Installations. Performance Research 13, 1 (Mar. 2008), 131--133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Fdili Alaoui, S., Bevilacqua, F., Bermudez, B., and Jacquemin, C. Dance Interaction with physical model visualization based on movement qualities Removed for review. International Journal of Arts and Technology, IJART (2013), 0--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Fernandes, C. M., and Costa, R. Looking for the linguistic knowledge behind the curtains of contemporary dance: the case of Rui Horta's creative process. International Journal of Arts and Technology (IJART) 3, 2 (2010), 235--250.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jacob, M., Zook, A., and Magerko, B. Viewpoints AI: Procedurally Representing and Reasoning about Gestures. Proceedings of DiGRA 2013 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Keersmaeker, A. T. D., and Cvejic, B. A Choreographer's Score: Fase, Rosas danst Rosas, Elena's Aria, Bartók. Mercatorfonds, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Laban, R., and Ullmann, L. Modern educational dance. MacDonald and Evans, 1963.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Lapointe, F., and Époque, M. The dancing genome project: generation of a human-computer choreography using a genetic algorithm. Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM Multimedia conference (2005), 555--558. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Loke, L., and Robertson, T. Making strange with the falling body in interactive technology design. In 3rd European Conference on Design and Semantics of Form and Movement (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. McKinney, J., Wallis, M., Popat, S., Bryden, J., and Hogg, D. Embodied conversations: Performance and the design of a robotic dancing partner Embodied conversations:. In Undisciplined! Design Research Society Conference, Sheffield Hallam University (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Nakazawa, M., and Paezold-Ruehl, A. Dancing, dance and choreography: an intelligent nondeterministic generator. In The Fifth Richard Tapia Celebration of Diversity in Computing Conference: Intellect, Initiatives, Insight, and Innovations (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Palazzi, M., and Shaw, N. Z. Synchronous Objects for One Flat Thing, reproduced. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH), vol. 1 (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Schiphorst, T., Calvert, T., Lee, C., Welman, C., and Gaudet, S. Tools for interaction with the creative process of composition. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (SIGCHI), ACM (1990), 167--174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Schiphorst, T., and Cunningham, M. making dances with a computer, Choreography and Dance. Harwood Academic Press 4, 3 (1997), 79--98.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Shapiro, A., Cao, Y., and Faloutsos, P. Style components. Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2006 (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Soga, A., Umino, B., Yasuda, T., and Yokoi, S. Automatic Composition and Simulation System for Ballet Sequences Using 3D Motion Archive. Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW'06) (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Subyen, P., Maranan, D. S., Calrson, K., Schiphorst, T., and Pasquier, P. Flow: Expressing Movement Quality. In Learning, The User in Flux Workshop at CHI '11 (Vancouver, Canada, 2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Yu, T., and Johnson, P. Tour Jeté, Pirouette: Dance Choreographing by. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation --- GECCO 2003 (2003), 156--157. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Choreography as Mediated through Compositional Tools for Movement: Constructing A Historical Perspective

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MOCO '14: Proceedings of the 2014 International Workshop on Movement and Computing
      June 2014
      184 pages
      ISBN:9781450328142
      DOI:10.1145/2617995

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 June 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      MOCO '14 Paper Acceptance Rate24of54submissions,44%Overall Acceptance Rate50of110submissions,45%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader