skip to main content
10.1145/2620728.2620738acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free access

ClosedFlow: openflow-like control over proprietary devices

Published: 22 August 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Software Defined Networking (SDN) offers unprecedented control to network administrators. With datacenters, because of the rapid build-out (new equipment installed) and the pervasiveness of virtualization (software switches are widely used), SDN is rapidly gaining traction. The reality for enterprises is that there is already an existing (legacy) network and, for the most part, companies don't have the excess capital to throw away their current investment and replace all of their network equipment with SDN capable devices. This means that uptake of SDN in enterprises is understandably slow. What is needed is a way for companies to gradually transition to SDN. In this paper, we present ClosedFlow, a system which incorporates techniques for exercising SDN control over existing proprietary hardware which closely mimics the fine grain control available in OpenFlow. This allows enterprises to control the network through a centralized controller, taking advantage of SDN's benefits today with no new investment, and gradually transition the hardware to SDN enabled hardware (e.g., OpenFlow) over time as part of their typical equipment replacement lifecycle.

References

[1]
About nicira. http://www.nicira.com/about/.
[2]
Cisco IOS Embedded Event Manager (EEM). http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/ios-nx-os-software/ios-embedded-event-manager-eem/.
[3]
Perspectives: Networking needs a VMware. http://www.bigswitch.com/wp/about-us/.
[4]
Ryu. http://osrg.github.io/ryu/.
[5]
Floodlight. http://floodlight.openflowhub.org, 2013.
[6]
M. Casado, M. J. Freedman, J. Pettit, J. Luo, N. McKeown, and S. Shenker. Ethane: taking control of the enterprise. In Proc. SIGCOMM, 2007.
[7]
T.-C. Chiueh, C.-C. Tu, Y.-C. Wang, P.-W. Wang, K.-W. Li, and Y.-M. Huang. Peregrine: An all-layer-2 container computer network. In IEEE Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD), June 2012.
[8]
A. R. Curtis, J. C. Mogul, J. Tourrilhes, P. Yalagandula, P. Sharma, and S. Banerjee. DevoFlow: Scaling Flow Management for High-performance Networks. In Proc. SIGCOMM, 2011.
[9]
D. Erickson et al. A demonstration of virtual machine mobility in an OpenFlow network, August 2008. Demo at ACM SIGCOMM.
[10]
A. Greenberg, J. R. Hamilton, N. Jain, S. Kandula, C. Kim, P. Lahiri, D. A. Maltz, P. Patel, and S. Sengupta. VL2: A Scalable and Flexible Data Center Network. In Proc. SIGCOMM, 2009.
[11]
R. Hand, M. Ton, and E. Keller. Active security. In Proc Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (HotNets), 2013.
[12]
N. Handigol, S. Seetharaman, M. Flajslik, N. McKeown, and R. Johari. Plug-n-Serve: Load-balancing web traffic using OpenFlow, August 2009. Demo at ACM SIGCOMM.
[13]
B. Heller, S. Seetharaman, P. Mahadevan, Y. Yiakoumis, P. Sharma, S. Banerjee, and N. McKeown. ElasticTree: Saving energy in data center networks. In Networked Systems Design and Implementation, April 2010.
[14]
L. Jose, M. Yu, and J. Rexford. Online measurement of large traffic aggregates on commodity switches. In Workshop on Hot Topics in Management of Internet, Cloud, and Enterprise Networks and Services, March 2011.
[15]
T. Koponen, M. Casado, N. Gude, J. Stribling, L. Poutievski, M. Zhu, R. Ramanathan, Y. Iwata, H. Inoue, T. Hama, and S. Shenker. Onix: A distributed control platform for large-scale production networks. In Operating Systems Design and Implementation, October 2010.
[16]
D. Levin, M. Canini, S. Schmid, and A. Feldmann. Panopticon: Reaping the Benefits of Partial SDN Deployment in Enterprise Networks. Technical report, Technische Universität Berlin / Deutsche Telekom Laboratories, 2013.
[17]
N. McKeown, T. Anderson, H. Balakrishnan, G. Parulkar, L. Peterson, J. Rexford, S. Shenker, and J. Turner. OpenFlow: Enabling innovation in campus networks. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. (CCR), 38(2), 2008.
[18]
J. C. Mogul and P. Congdon. Hey, You Darned Counters!: Get off My ASIC! In Proc. Workshop on Hot Topics in Software Defined Networks (HotSDN), 2012.
[19]
M. Monaco, O. Michel, and E. Keller. Applying Operating System Principles to SDN Controller Design. In Proc. Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (HotNets), 2013.
[20]
R. Sherwood, G. Gibb, K.-K. Yap, G. Appenzeller, M. Casado, N. McKeown, and G. Parulkar. Can the production network be the testbed? In Operating Systems Design and Implementation, October 2010.
[21]
S. Shin, P. Porras, V. Yegneswaran, M. Fong, G. Gu, and M. Tyson. Fresco: Modular composable security services for software-defined networks. In Proc. Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS), February 2013.
[22]
S. Shin, V. Yegneswaran, P. Porras, and G. Gu. AVANT-GUARD: Scalable and Vigilant Switch Flow Management in Software-defined Networks. In Proc. ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS), 2013.
[23]
R. Wang, D. Butnariu, and J. Rexford. OpenFlow-based server load balancing gone wild. In Hot-ICE, March 2011

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Software‐Defined Networks and Its ApplicationsSoftware Defined Networks10.1002/9781119857921.ch3(63-96)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2022
  • (2021)A Middleware for Integrating Legacy Network Devices into Software-Defined Networking (SDN)Towards new e-Infrastructure and e-Services for Developing Countries10.1007/978-3-030-70572-5_8(121-139)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2021
  • (2020)Performance issues and solutions in SDN-based data center: a surveyThe Journal of Supercomputing10.1007/s11227-020-03180-7Online publication date: 30-Jan-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
HotSDN '14: Proceedings of the third workshop on Hot topics in software defined networking
August 2014
252 pages
ISBN:9781450329897
DOI:10.1145/2620728
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 August 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. legacy devices
  2. openflow
  3. software-defined networking

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

SIGCOMM'14
Sponsor:
SIGCOMM'14: ACM SIGCOMM 2014 Conference
August 22, 2014
Illinois, Chicago, USA

Acceptance Rates

HotSDN '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 50 of 114 submissions, 44%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 88 of 198 submissions, 44%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)50
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9
Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Software‐Defined Networks and Its ApplicationsSoftware Defined Networks10.1002/9781119857921.ch3(63-96)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2022
  • (2021)A Middleware for Integrating Legacy Network Devices into Software-Defined Networking (SDN)Towards new e-Infrastructure and e-Services for Developing Countries10.1007/978-3-030-70572-5_8(121-139)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2021
  • (2020)Performance issues and solutions in SDN-based data center: a surveyThe Journal of Supercomputing10.1007/s11227-020-03180-7Online publication date: 30-Jan-2020
  • (2019)Sensor Fusion Used in Applications for Hand Rehabilitation: A Systematic ReviewIEEE Sensors Journal10.1109/JSEN.2019.289708319:10(3581-3592)Online publication date: 15-May-2019
  • (2019)SDN/legacy Hybrid Network Control System2019 Eleventh International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN)10.1109/ICUFN.2019.8806028(504-509)Online publication date: Jul-2019
  • (2019)Paving the Way towards Enterprise SDN Adoption: New Selection Strategies for Hybrid Networks2019 22nd Conference on Innovation in Clouds, Internet and Networks and Workshops (ICIN)10.1109/ICIN.2019.8685895(322-328)Online publication date: Feb-2019
  • (2019)Enabling Shared Control and Trust in Hybrid SDN/Legacy Networks2019 28th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN)10.1109/ICCCN.2019.8847080(1-9)Online publication date: Jul-2019
  • (2019)A Survey of Deployment Solutions and Optimization Strategies for Hybrid SDN NetworksIEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials10.1109/COMST.2018.287106121:2(1483-1507)Online publication date: Oct-2020
  • (2019)A Framework to Achieve Full Waypoint Enforcement in Hybrid SDN NetworksPrimate Life Histories, Sex Roles, and Adaptability10.1007/978-3-030-15032-7_28(325-340)Online publication date: 15-Mar-2019
  • (2019)Solutions for adopting software defined network in practiceInternational Journal of Communication Systems10.1002/dac.399032:17Online publication date: 29-May-2019
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media