research-article

Free access

tinyNBI: distilling an API from essential OpenFlow abstractions

Authors:

C. Jasson Casey,

Andrew Sutton,

Alex SprintsonAuthors Info & Claims

HotSDN '14: Proceedings of the third workshop on Hot topics in software defined networking

Pages 37 - 42

https://doi.org/10.1145/2620728.2620757

Published: 22 August 2014 Publication History

PDF eReader

Abstract

If simplicity is a key strategy for success as a network protocol OpenFlow is not winning. At its core OpenFlow presents a simple idea, which is a network switch data plane abstraction along with a control protocol for manipulating that abstraction. The result of this idea has been far from simple: a new version released each year, five active versions, complex feature dependencies, unstable version negotiation, lack of state machine definition, etc. This complexity represents roadblocks for network, software, and hardware engineers.

We have distilled the core abstractions present in 5 existing versions of OpenFlow and refactored them into a simple API called tinyNBI. Our work does not provide high level network abstractions (address pools, VPN maps, etc.), instead it focuses on providing a clean low level interface that supports the development of these higher layer abstractions. The goal of tinyNBI is to allow configuration of all existing OpenFlow abstractions without having to deal with the unique personalities of each version of OpenFlow or their level of support in target switches.

References

[1]

C.J. Anderson, N. Foster, A. Guha, J-B. Jeannin, D. Kozen, C. Schlesinger, and D. Walker. Netkat: Semantic foundations for networks. In Proceedings of the 41st annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pages 113--126, 2014.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[2]

Flowgrammable.org. freeflow. http://flowgrammable.org/freeflow/, 2014.

Google Scholar

[3]

N. Foster, R. Harrison, M.J. Freedman, C. Monsanto, J. Rexford, A. Story, and D. Walker. Frenetic: A network programming language. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 46(9):279--291, 2011.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[4]

A. Guha, M. Reitblatt, and N. Foster. Machine-verified network controllers. In Proceedings of the 34th ACM SIGPLAN conference on Programming language design and implementation, pages 483--494, 2013.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[5]

A. Voellmy, J. Wang, Y.R. Yang, B. Ford, and P. Hudak. Maple: Simplifying sdn programming using algorithmic policies. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2013 conference on SIGCOMM, pages 87--98, 2013.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[6]

Andreas Voellmy, Ashish Agarwal, and Paul Hudak. Nettle: Functional reactive programming for openflow networks. Technical report, DTIC Document, 2010.

Google Scholar

[7]

M. Yu, A. Wundsam, and M. Raju. NOSIX: A lightweight portability layer for the SDN OS, 2013.

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Wijesekara PGunawardena S(2023)A Comprehensive Survey on Knowledge-Defined NetworkingTelecom10.3390/telecom40300254:3(477-596)Online publication date: 2-Aug-2023
https://doi.org/10.3390/telecom4030025
Geissler SHerrnleben SBauer RGebert SZinner TJarschel M(2017)Tablevisor 2.0: Towards full-featured, scalable and hardware-independent multi table processing2017 IEEE Conference on Network Softwarization (NetSoft)10.1109/NETSOFT.2017.8004108(1-8)Online publication date: Jul-2017
https://doi.org/10.1109/NETSOFT.2017.8004108
Chen XWu T(2017)Towards the Semantic Web Based Northbound Interface for SDN Resource Management2017 IEEE 11th International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC)10.1109/ICSC.2017.27(40-47)Online publication date: 2017
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSC.2017.27
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

tinyNBI: distilling an API from essential OpenFlow abstractions

Recommendations

Network parameters effects on system resources in software defined networks
ICICT '19: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Communication Technology

Software Defined Networking (SDN), often referred to as a revolutionary rather than an evolutionary new idea in networking, promises to dramatically simplify network control, management, and enable innovation through network programmability. SDN has ...
Performance Analysis of SDN/OpenFlow Controllers: POX Versus Floodlight

Software-Defined Networking (SDN) is an emerging network architecture that is adaptable, dynamic, cost-effective, and manageable. The SDN architecture is a form of network virtualization where the network controlling functions and forwarding functions ...
Integrating Mobile OpenFlow Based Network Architecture with Legacy Infrastructure
Information and Communication Technology
Abstract
UnifyCore is a concept of SDN centric, OpenFlow based and access agnostic network architecture, which changes the way networks are being built today. It is designed in a way, so present access technologies can be easily integrated in it. It ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

HotSDN '14: Proceedings of the third workshop on Hot topics in software defined networking

August 2014

252 pages

ISBN:9781450329897

DOI:10.1145/2620728

Program Chairs:
Aditya Akella
University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA
,
Albert Greenberg
Microsoft, USA

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 August 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

Air Force Office of Scientific Research

Conference

SIGCOMM'14

Sponsor:

SIGCOMM

SIGCOMM'14: ACM SIGCOMM 2014 Conference

August 22, 2014

Illinois, Chicago, USA

Acceptance Rates

HotSDN '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 50 of 114 submissions, 44%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 88 of 198 submissions, 44%

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

11
Total Citations
View Citations
705
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)65
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Wijesekara PGunawardena S(2023)A Comprehensive Survey on Knowledge-Defined NetworkingTelecom10.3390/telecom40300254:3(477-596)Online publication date: 2-Aug-2023
https://doi.org/10.3390/telecom4030025
Geissler SHerrnleben SBauer RGebert SZinner TJarschel M(2017)Tablevisor 2.0: Towards full-featured, scalable and hardware-independent multi table processing2017 IEEE Conference on Network Softwarization (NetSoft)10.1109/NETSOFT.2017.8004108(1-8)Online publication date: Jul-2017
https://doi.org/10.1109/NETSOFT.2017.8004108
Chen XWu T(2017)Towards the Semantic Web Based Northbound Interface for SDN Resource Management2017 IEEE 11th International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC)10.1109/ICSC.2017.27(40-47)Online publication date: 2017
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSC.2017.27
Rivera SFei ZGriffioen J(2016)RAPTOR: A REST API translaTOR for OpenFlow controllers2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS)10.1109/INFCOMW.2016.7562096(328-333)Online publication date: Apr-2016
https://doi.org/10.1109/INFCOMW.2016.7562096
Shome PModares JMastronarde NSprintson A(2016)Enabling Dynamic Reconfigurability of SDRs Using SDN PrinciplesAd Hoc Networks10.1007/978-3-319-51204-4_30(369-381)Online publication date: 17-Dec-2016
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51204-4_30
Alsmadi IZarour M(2016)Empirical Evidences in Software-Defined Network Security: A Systematic Literature ReviewInformation Fusion for Cyber-Security Analytics10.1007/978-3-319-44257-0_11(253-295)Online publication date: 22-Oct-2016
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44257-0_11
Lopez MCasey CReis GChojnacki C(2015)Safer SDN programming through ArbiterACM SIGPLAN Notices10.1145/2936314.281421851:3(65-74)Online publication date: 26-Oct-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2936314.2814218
Lopez MCasey CReis GChojnacki CKästner CGokhālé A(2015)Safer SDN programming through ArbiterProceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Generative Programming: Concepts and Experiences10.1145/2814204.2814218(65-74)Online publication date: 26-Oct-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2814204.2814218
Shome PMuxi Yan Najafabad SMastronarde NSprintson A(2015)CrossFlow: A cross-layer architecture for SDR using SDN principles2015 IEEE Conference on Network Function Virtualization and Software Defined Network (NFV-SDN)10.1109/NFV-SDN.2015.7387403(37-39)Online publication date: Nov-2015
https://doi.org/10.1109/NFV-SDN.2015.7387403
Kreutz DRamos FEsteves Verissimo PEsteve Rothenberg CAzodolmolky SUhlig S(2015)Software-Defined Networking: A Comprehensive SurveyProceedings of the IEEE10.1109/JPROC.2014.2371999103:1(14-76)Online publication date: Jan-2015
https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2014.2371999
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Network parameters effects on system resources in software defined networks

Performance Analysis of SDN/OpenFlow Controllers: POX Versus Floodlight

Integrating Mobile OpenFlow Based Network Architecture with Legacy Infrastructure