Topic-factorized ideal point estimation model for legislative voting network

ABSTRACT

Ideal point estimation that estimates legislators' ideological positions and understands their voting behavior has attracted studies from political science and computer science. Typically, a legislator is assigned a global ideal point based on her voting or other social behavior. However, it is quite normal that people may have different positions on different policy dimensions. For example, some people may be more liberal on economic issues while more conservative on cultural issues. In this paper, we propose a novel topic-factorized ideal point estimation model for a legislative voting network in a unified framework. First, we model the ideal points of legislators and bills for each topic instead of assigning them to a global one. Second, the generation of topics are guided by the voting matrix in addition to the text information contained in bills. A unified model that combines voting behavior modeling and topic modeling is presented, and an iterative learning algorithm is proposed to learn the topics of bills as well as the topic-factorized ideal points of legislators and bills. By comparing with the state-of-the-art ideal point estimation models, our method has a much better explanation power in terms of held-out log-likelihood and other measures. Besides, case studies show that the topic-factorized ideal points coincide with human intuition. Finally, we illustrate how to use these topic-factorized ideal points to predict voting results for unseen bills.

References

1. D. Agarwal and B.-C. Chen. flda: matrix factorization through latent dirichlet allocation. In Proc. of the third ACM Int. Conf. on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM'10), pages 91--100, 2010.
2. P. Barberá. Birds of the same feather tweet together. bayesian ideal point estimation using twitter data. Unpublished manuscript, New York University, 2013.
3. D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan. Latent dirichlet allocation. the Journal of Machine Learning Research (JMLR'03), 3:993--1022, 2003.
4. J. Clinton, S. Jackman, and D. Rivers. The statistical analysis of roll call data. American Political Science Review, 98(02):355--370, 2004.
5. S. Feldman and C. Johnston. Understanding the determinants of political ideology: Implications of structural complexity. Political Psychology, 2013.
6. S. Gerrish and D. M. Blei. Predicting legislative roll calls from text. In Proc. of the 28th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning (ICML'11), pages 489--496, 2011.
7. S. Gerrish and D. M. Blei. How they vote: Issue-adjusted models of legislative behavior. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS'12), pages 2762--2770, 2012.
8. J. J. Heckman and J. M. S. Jr. Linear probability models of the demand for attributes with an empirical application to estimating the preferences of legislators. The RAND Journal of Economics, 28:pp. S142--S189, 1997.
9. J. L. Herlocker, J. A. Konstan, A. Borchers, and J. Riedl. An algorithmic framework for performing collaborative filtering. In Proc. of the 22nd Annual Int. ACM SIGIR Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 230--237, 1999.
10. T. Hofmann. Probabilistic latent semantic analysis. In Proc. of the Fifteenth Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI'99), pages 289--296, 1999.
11. Y. Koren, R. Bell, and C. Volinsky. Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. Computer, 42(8):30--37, 2009.
12. J. Londregan. Estimating legislators' preferred points. Political Analysis, 8(1):35--56, 1999.
13. J. McAuley and J. Leskovec. Hidden factors and hidden topics: understanding rating dimensions with review text. In Proc. of the 7th ACM Conf. on Recommender Systems (RecSys'13), pages 165--172, 2013.
14. Q. Mei, D. Cai, D. Zhang, and C. Zhai. Topic modeling with network regularization. In Proc. of the 17th Int. Conf. on World Wide Web (WWW'08), pages 101--110, 2008.
15. A. Mnih and R. Salakhutdinov. Probabilistic matrix factorization. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS'07), pages 1257--1264, 2007.
16. B. Pang and L. Lee. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2(1-2):1--135, 2008.
17. K. T. Poole. Recovering a basic space from a set of issue scales. American Journal of Political Science, 42(3):954--993, 1998.
18. K. T. Poole and H. Rosenthal. A spatial model for legislative roll call analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29(2):pp. 357--384, 1985.
19. K. T. Poole and H. Rosenthal. Patterns of congressional voting. American Journal of Political Science, 35(1):pp. 228--278, 1991.
20. K. T. Poole and H. Rosenthal. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. Oxford University Press, 1997.
21. Y. Sun, J. Han, J. Gao, and Y. Yu. iTopicModel: Information network-integrated topic modeling. In Proc. 2009 Int. Conf. Data Mining (ICDM'09), Miami, FL, 2009.
22. C. Wang and D. M. Blei. Collaborative topic modeling for recommending scientific articles. In Proc. of the 17th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD'11), pages 448--456, 2011.
23. E. Wang, D. Liu, J. Silva, L. Carin, and D. B. Dunson. Joint analysis of time-evolving binary matrices and associated documents. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS'10), pages 2370--2378, 2010.
24. C. Zhai, A. Velivelli, and B. Yu. A cross-collection mixture model for comparative text mining. In Proc. of the tenth ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD'04), pages 743--748, 2004.

Index Terms

• Software and its engineering

  • Software notations and tools

    • General programming languages

      • Language features

        • Data types and structures