skip to main content
10.1145/2628363.2634259acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
tutorial

Socio-technical practices and work-home boundaries

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 September 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recent advances in mobile technology have had many positive effects on the ways in which people can combine work and home life. For example, having remote access enables people to work from home, or work flexible hours that fit around caring responsibilities. They also support communication with colleagues and family members, and enable digital hobbies. However, the resulting 'always-online' culture can undermine work-home boundaries and cause stress to those who feel under pressure to respond immediately to digital notifications. This workshop will explore how a socio-technical perspective, which views boundaries as being constituted by everyday socio-technical practices, can inform the design of technologies that help maintain boundaries between work and home life.

References

  1. Chesley, N. (2010) Technology use and employee assessments of work effectiveness, workload, and pace of life. Information, Communication & Society, Vol 13 (4), pp. . 485--514.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Currie J. and Eveline J. (2011) E-technology and work-life balance for academics with children. Higher Education, Vol 62, pp. . 533--550.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Duxbury, L. and Smart, R. (2011), 'The "Myth of Separate Worlds": An Exploration of How Mobile Technology has Redefined Work-Life Balance', in S. Kaiser et al (eds) Creating Balance? Springer, pp. 269--284.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Edwards, J. R., and Rothbard, N. P. (2000) Mechanisms Linking Work and Family: Clarifying the Relationship Between Work and Family Constructs. Academy of Management Review, 25, pp. 178--199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Gant, D. & Kiesler, S. (2001), Blurring the Boundaries: Cell Phones, Mobility, and the Line between Work and Personal Life, in B. Brown and N. Green, Wireless World, Springer, pp. 121--31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Jarvis J. and Pratt A. C. (2006) Bringing it all back home: The extensification and 'overflowing' of work. Geoforum, 37, pp. 331--339.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Kreiner, G. E., Hollensbe, E. C., and Sheep, M. L. (2006) On the Edge of Identity: Boundary Dynamics at the Interface of Individual and Organizational Identities. Human Relations, 59, pp. 1315--1341.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Mark, G., Gudith, D. and Klocke, U., (2008), The cost of interrupted work: more speed and stress, In Proc. CHI 2008, ACM, pp. 107--110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Nansen, B., Arnold, M., Gibbs, M., Davis, H. (2010) Time, space and technology in the working-home: an unsettled nexus. New Technology, Work and Employment 25:2, pp. 136--153.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Orlikowski, W. J. (2010) The Sociomateriality of Organisational Life: Considering Technology in Management Research. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34, pp. 125--141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Parasuraman, S., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2002) Toward Reducing Some Critical Gaps in Work-Family Research. Human Resource Management Review, 12, pp. 299--312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Perlow, L. A. (1999), The time famine: Towards a Sociology of Work Time. Administration Science Quarterly, Vol. 44 (1), pp. 57--81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Rice, R. W., Frone, M. R., & McFarlin, D. B. (1992) Work-Nonwork Conflict and the Perceived Quality of Life. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, pp. 155--168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Sadler, K., Robertson, T., Kan, M. and Hagen, P. (2006), Balancing Work, Life and Other Concerns: A Study of Mobile Technology Use by Australian Freelancers, In Proc. of 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, ACM, pp. 413--416. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Shabajee, P. & Preist, P. (2013) Digitally Assisted Life-(Im)Balance? Proceedings of 1st Workshop on Habits in HCI, HCI2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Sonnentag, S. & Fritz, C. (2006). Endocrinological processes associated with job stress: Catecholamine and cortisol responses to acute and chronic stressors. In P. L. Perrewé, & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Research in Occupational Stress and Well Being: Employee health, coping, and methodologies, pp. 1--60.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Sonnentag, S. & Zijlstra, F. R. J. (2006). Job characteristics and off-job activities as predictors of need for recovery, well-being, and fatigue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 330--350.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Socio-technical practices and work-home boundaries

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MobileHCI '14: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices & services
      September 2014
      664 pages
      ISBN:9781450330046
      DOI:10.1145/2628363

      Copyright © 2014 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 September 2014

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • tutorial

      Acceptance Rates

      MobileHCI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate35of124submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate202of906submissions,22%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader