Abstract
Business process integration has become prevalent as business increasingly crosses organizational boundaries. To address the issue of protecting organizations’ competitive knowledge and private information while also enabling business-to-business (B2B) collaboration, past research has focused mainly on customized public and private process design, as well as structural correctness of the integrated workflow. However, a dataflow perspective is important for business process integration. This article presents a data-flow perspective using workflow management and mathematical techniques to address data exchange problems in independent multistakeholder business process integration in dynamic circumstances. The research is conducted following a design science paradigm. We build artifacts that include interorganizational workflow concepts, a workflow model, and a public dataset calculation method. The use of the proposed artifacts is illustrated by applying them to a real-world case in the Shenzhen (Chaiwan) port. The utility of the artifacts is evaluated through interviews with practitioners in industry. We conclude that this research complements the control-flow perspective in the interorganizational workflow management area and also contributes to B2B information-sharing literature; further, the dataflow formalism can help practitioners to formally provide the right data at the right time in dynamic circumstances.
- Y. Aviv. 2001. The effect of collaborative forecasting on supply chain performance. Management Science 47, 10, 1326--1343. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Basu and R. Blanning. 2003. Synthesis and decomposition of processes in organizations. Information Systems Research 14, 4, 337--355. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Basu and A. Kumar. 2002. Research commentary: Workflow management issues in e-business. Information Systems Research 13, 1, 1--14. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. Bi. 2004. Graphical and Logical Formalisms for Business Process Modeling and Verification, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Arizona. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Bussler. 2001. The role of B2B protocols in inter-enterprise process execution. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Technologies for E-Services (TES’01). Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Bussler. 2002. The application of workflow technology in semantic B2B integration. Distributed and Parallel Databases 12, 2, 163--191. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Cachon and M. Fisher. 2000. Supply chain inventory management and the value of shared information. Management Science 46, 8, 1032--1048. Google ScholarDigital Library
- I. Chebbi, S. Dustdar, and S. Tata. 2006. The view-based approach to dynamic inter-organizational workflow cooperation. Data & Knowledge Engineering 56, 2, 139--173. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Chiu, K. Karlapalem, and Q. Li. 2001. Views for inter-organization workflow in an e-commerce environment. In Proceedings of the 9th IFIP Working Conference on Database Semantics. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Chu and V. Leon. 2009. Scalable methodology for supply chain inventory coordination with private information. European Journal of Operational Research 195, 1, 262--279.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. D’Aubeterre, R. Singh, and L. Iyer. 2008. A semantic approach to secure collaborative inter-organizational ebusiness processes (SSCIOBP). Journal of the Association for Information Systems 9, 3/4, 231--266.Google Scholar
- U. Dayal, M. Hsu, and R. Ladin. 2001. Business process coordination: State of the art, trends, and open issues. In Proceedings of the 27th VLDB Conference. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. De Backer, M. Snoeck, G. Monsieur, W. Lemahieu, and G. Dedene. 2009. A scenario-based verification technique to assess the compatibility of collaborative business processes. Data & Knowledge Engineering 68, 6, 531--551. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Eshuis and P. Grefen. 2008. Constructing customized process views. Data & Knowledge Engineering 64, 2, 419--438. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Gosain, A. Malhotra, and O. El Sawy. 2004. Coordinating for flexibility in e-business supply chains. Journal of Management Information Systems 21, 3, 7--45. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Gunasekaran, H. B. Marri, R. E. McGaughey, and M. D. Nebhwani. 2002. E-commerce and its impact on operations management. International Journal of Production Economics 75, 1--2, 185--197.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Hevner, S. March, J. Park, and S. Ram. 2004. Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 28, 1, 75--106. Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. Q. Huang, J. S. K. Lau, and K. L. Mak. 2003. The impacts of sharing production information on supply chain dynamics: A review of the literature. International Journal of Production Research 41, 7, 1483--1517.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Kalvenes and A. Basu. 2006. Design of robust business-to-business electronic marketplaces with guaranteed privacy. Management Science 52, 11, 1721--1736. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Kim, N. Umanath, and B. Kim. 2006. An assessment of electronic information transfer in B2B supply-channel relationships. Journal of Management Information Systems 22, 3, 294--320. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Kindler, A. Martens, and W. Reisig. 2000. Inter-operability of workflow applications: Local criteria for global soundness. In Business Process Management: Models, Techniques, and Empirical Studies, W. van der Aalst, J. Desel, A. Oberweis (Eds.), 235--253. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Klein, A. Rai, and D. Straub. 2007. Competitive and cooperative positioning in supply chain logistics relationships. Decision Sciences 38, 4, 611--646.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. Lee, V. Padmanabhan, and S. Whang. 1997. The bullwhip effect in supply chains. Sloan Management Review 38, 3, 93--102.Google Scholar
- C. Legner and J. Schemm. 2008. Toward the Inter-organizational product information supply chain -- evidence from the retail and consumer goods industries. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 9, 3/4, 119--150.Google Scholar
- C. Legner, K. Wende, and A. digitale Forschungsplattform. 2007. The challenges of interorganizational business process design-a research agenda. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS’07). 106--118.Google Scholar
- K. Lenz and A. Oberweis. 2003. Inter-organizational business process management with XML nets. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2472, 243--263.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Leymann and W. Altenhuber. 1994. Managing business processes as an information resource. IBM Journal of Research and Development 33, 2, 326--348. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Li and H. Zhang. 2008. Confidentiality and information sharing in supply chain coordination. Management Science 54, 8, 1467--1481. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D.-R. Liu and M. Shen. 2003. Workflow modeling for virtual processes: an order-preserving process-view approach. Information Systems 28, 6, 505--532. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D.-R. Liu and M. Shen. 2004. Business-to-business workflow interoperation based on process-views. Decision Support Systems 38, 3, 399--419. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Malhotra, S. Gosain, and O. El Sawy. 2005. Absorptive capacity configurations in supply chains: Gearing for partner-enabled market knowledge creation. MIS Quarterly 29, 1, 145--187. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Mani, A. Barua, and A. Whinston. 2010. An empirical analysis of the impact of information capabilities design on business process outsourcing performance. MIS Quarterly 34, 1, 39--62. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. March, T. S. Raghu, and A. Vinze. 2008. Editorial introduction: Cultivating and securing the information supply chain. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 9, 4, 95--97.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. D. Myers and M. Newman. 2007. The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft. Information and Organization 17, 1, 2--26. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Papoulis. 1984. Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
- R. Patnayakuni, A. Rai, and N. Seth. 2006. Relational antecedents of information flow integration for supply chain coordination. Journal of Management Information Systems 23, 1, 13--49. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Raghu, B. Jayaraman, and H. Rao. 2004. Toward an integration of agent- and activity-centric approaches in organizational process modeling: Incorporating incentive mechanisms. Information Systems Research 15, 4, 316--335. Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Romano Jr., J. Pick, and N. Roztocki. 2007. Editorial introduction to the special issue on collaboration issues in cross-organizational and cross-border IS/IT. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 8, 4.Google Scholar
- K. A. Schulz and M. E. Orlowska. 2004. Facilitating cross-organisational workflows with a workflow view approach. Data & Knowledge Engineering 51, 1, 109--147. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Sobrero and E. Roberts. 2001. The trade-off between efficiency and learning in interorganizational relationships for product development. Management Science 47, 4, 493--511. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Sun, A. Kumar, and J. Yen. 2006a. Merging workflows: A new perspective on connecting business processes. Decision Support Systems 42, 2, 844--858. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. X. Sun, J. L. Zhao, F. N. Jay, and R. L. S. Olivia. 2006b. Formulating the data-flow perspective for business process management. Information Systems Research 17, 4, 374--391. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. M. P. Van der Aalst. 1999a. Interorganizational workflows. Systems Analysis Modelling Simulation 34, 3, 335--368.Google Scholar
- W. M. P. Van der Aalst. 1999b. Process-oriented architectures for electronic commerce and interorganizational workflow. Information Systems 24, 8, 639--671. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. M. P. Van der Aalst. 2000. Loosely coupled interorganizational workflows: modeling and analyzing workflows crossing organizational boundaries. Information & Management 37, 2, 67--75. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. M. P. Van der Aalst and K. Akhil. 2003. XML-based schema definition for support of interorganizational workflow. Information Systems Research 14, 1, 23--46. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. M. P. Van der Aalst, N. Lohmann, P. Massuthe, C. Stahl, and K. Wolf. 2008. From public views to private views-correctness-by-design for services. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Web Services and Formal Methods (WS-FM’07). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 139--153. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. M. P. Van der Aalst and M. Weske. 2001a. The P2P approach to interorganizational workflows. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. M. P. Van der Aalst and M. Weske. 2001b. The P2P approach to interorganizational workflows. In Advanced Information Systems Engineering. Springer, 140--156. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. D. C. d. Vimercati, S. Foresti, S. Jajodia, S. Paraboschi, G. Pelosi, and P. Samarati. 2008. Preserving confidentiality of security policies in data outsourcing. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society: Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Xiong, S. Chitti, and L. Liu. 2007. Preserving data privacy in outsourcing data aggregation services. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology 7, 3, 1--28. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Zeng, B. Benatallah, A. Ngu, M. Dumas, J. Kalagnanam, and H. Chang. 2004. QoS-aware middleware for web services composition. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 30, 5, 311--327. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Zhu. 2004. Information transparency of business-to-business electronic markets: A game-theoretic analysis. Management Science 50, 5, 670--685. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- A Dataflow Perspective for Business Process Integration
Recommendations
Business process integration: method and analysis
APCCM '09: Proceedings of the Sixth Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modeling - Volume 96In the study of business management, process integration has become an interesting area of research that affects analysts studying and working on existing system plans. Process integration aims to investigate relationships across a business compendium ...
Business information modeling for process integration in the mold making industry
Driven by industrial needs and enabled by the latest information technology, enterprise integration has rapidly shifted from information integration to process integration for performance excellence in the entire business process. This paper reports on ...
Business process design: Process comparison and integration
This paper proposes a framework for business process design, which is based on process comparison and integration. This framework supports process stakeholders to model business processes collaboratively, which can greatly enhance the efficiency and ...
Comments