skip to main content
10.1145/2632048.2632102acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Diagnosing New York city's noises with ubiquitous data

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 September 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Many cities suffer from noise pollution, which compromises people's working efficiency and even mental health. New York City (NYC) has opened a platform, entitled 311, to allow people to complain about the city's issues by using a mobile app or making a phone call; noise is the third largest category of complaints in the 311 data. As each complaint about noises is associated with a location, a time stamp, and a fine-grained noise category, such as "Loud Music" or "Construction", the data is actually a result of "human as a sensor" and "crowd sensing", containing rich human intelligence that can help diagnose urban noises. In this paper we infer the fine-grained noise situation (consisting of a noise pollution indicator and the composition of noises) of different times of day for each region of NYC, by using the 311 complaint data together with social media, road network data, and Points of Interests (POIs). We model the noise situation of NYC with a three dimension tensor, where the three dimensions stand for regions, noise categories, and time slots, respectively. Supplementing the missing entries of the tensor through a context-aware tensor decomposition approach, we recover the noise situation throughout NYC. The information can inform people and officials' decision making. We evaluate our method with four real datasets, verifying the advantages of our method beyond four baselines, such as the interpolation-based approach.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p715-zheng.mov

mov

249.8 MB

References

  1. 311. http://nycopendata.socrata.com/Social-Services/311-Service-Requests-from-2010-to-Present/erm2-nwe9Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Couvreur, C. Environmental sound recognition: a statistical approach. Facult'e Polytechnique de Mons, Phd Thesis, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. D'Hondt, E., and Stevens, M. Participatory noise mapping. In Demo Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Pervasive Computing, pp. 33--36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Filipponi, L., Santini, S., and Vitaletti, A. Data collection in wireless sensor networks for noise pollution monitoring. In Proc. DCOSS 2008, IEEE Press (2008), 492--497. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Gaunard, P., Mubikangiey, C. G., Couvreur, C., and Fontaine, V. Automatic classification of environmental noise events by hidden Markov models. Applied Acoustics, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Karatzoglou, A., Amatriain, X., Baltrunas, L., and Oliver, N. Multiverse recommendation: n-dimensional tensor factorization for context-aware collaborative filtering. In Proc. RecSys 2010, ACM Press (2010), 79--86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Kolda, T. G., and Bader, B. W. Tensor decompositions and applications. SIAM review, 51, 3(2009): 455--500. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Maisonneuve, N., Stevens, M., Niessen, M. E., and Steels, L. NoiseTube: Measuring and mapping noise pollution with mobile phones. In Proc. ITEE 2009, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 215--228.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Ma, L., Smith, D., and Milner, B. Environmental noise classification for context-aware applications. In Proc. DEXA 2003, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 360--370.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Lane, N. D., Miluzzo, E., Lu, H., Peebles, D., Choudhury, T., and Campbell, A. T. A survey of mobile phone sensing. Journal of Communications Magazine, IEEE, 48, 9(2010): 140--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Li, D., Sethi, I. K., Dimitrova, N., and McGee, T. Classification of general audio data for content-based retrieval. Journal of Pattern recognition letters, 22, 5 (2001): 533--544. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Liu, T., Zheng, Y., Liu, L., Liu, Y., Zhu, Y. Methods for sensing urban noises. MSR-TR-2014-66, May 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Lu, H., Pan, W., Lane, N. D., Choudhury, T., and Campbell, A. T. SoundSense: scalable sound sensing for people-centric applications on mobile phones. In Proc. MobiSys 2009, ACM Press (2009), 165--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Oliver, Margaret A., and R. Webster. Kriging: a method of interpolation for geographical information systems. Journal of Geographical Information System, 4, 3(1990): 313--332.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Pushp, S., Min, C., Lee, Y., Liu, C. H., and Song, J. Towards crowd-aware sensing platform for metropolitan environments. In Proc. SenSys 2012, ACM Press (2012), 335--336. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Rana, R. K., Chou, C. T., Kanhere, S. S., Bulusu, N., and Hu, W. Ear-phone: an end-to-end participatory urban noise mapping system. In Proc. IPSN 2010, ACM Press (2010), 105--116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Santini, S., Ostermaier, B., and Vitaletti, A. First experiences using wireless sensor networks for noise pollution monitoring. In Woekshop on REALWSN 2008, ACM Press (2008), 61--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Santini, S., and Vitaletti, A. Wireless sensor networks for environmental noise monitoring. 6. Fachgespräch Sensornetzwerke (2007), 98.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Stevens, M., and D'Hondt, E. Crowdsourcing of pollution data using smartphones. In Workshop on Ubiquitous Crowdsourcing 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Xu, C., Li, S., Liu, G., Zhang, Y., Miluzzo, E., Chen, Y. F., Li, J., and Firner, B. Crowd++: unsupervised speaker count with smartphones. In Proc. Ubicomp 2013, ACM Press (2013), 43--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Yang, D., Zhang, D., Yu, Z., and Yu, Z. Fine-grained preference-aware location search leveraging crowdsourced digital footprints from LBSNs. In Proc. Ubicomp 2013, ACM Press (2013), 479--488. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Yilmaz, E., Kanoulas, E., and Aslam, J. A. (2008, July). A simple and efficient sampling method for estimating AP and NDCG. In Proc. SIGIR 2008, ACM Press (2008), 603--610. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Wang, Y., Zheng, Y., Xue, Y. Travel Time Estimation of a Path using Sparse Trajectories. In Proc. of KDD 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Yuan, N. J., Zheng, Y., and Xie, X. Segmentation of urban areas using road networks. MSR-TR-2012-65. 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Yuan, N. J., Zheng, Y., and Xie, X. Discovering regions of different functions in a city using human mobility and POIs. In Proc. KDD 2012, ACM Press (2012), 186--194. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Zhang, A. X., Noulas, A., Scellato, S., and Mascolo, C. Hoodsquare: Modeling and Recommending Neighborhoods in Location-based Social Networks. In Proc. SocialCom 2013, IEEE Press (2013), 69--74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Zhang, F., Wilkie, D., Zheng, Y., and Xie, X. Sensing the pulse of urban refueling behavior. In Proc. UbiComp 2013, ACM Press (2013), 13--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Zheng, V. W., Cao, B., Zheng, Y., Xie, X., and Yang, Q. Collaborative Filtering Meets Mobile Recommendation: A User-centered Approach. In Proc. AAAI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 236--241.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Zheng, V. W., Zheng, Y., Xie, X., and Yang, Q. Towards mobile intelligence: Learning from GPS history data for collaborative recommendation. Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 184(2012): 17--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Zheng, Y., Capra, L., Wolfson, O., Yang, H. Urban Computing: concepts, methodologies, and applications. ACM Trans. on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 5, 3 (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Data and executable files released at: http://research.microsoft.com/apps/pubs/?id=217236Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang, Y., Zheng, Y., Liu, T. A noise map of New York City. In Proc. of UbiComp 2014. Demo Paper. Website URL: http://citynoise.azurewebsites.net/ Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Diagnosing New York city's noises with ubiquitous data

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          UbiComp '14: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing
          September 2014
          973 pages
          ISBN:9781450329682
          DOI:10.1145/2632048

          Copyright © 2014 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 13 September 2014

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

          Upcoming Conference

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader