skip to main content
10.1145/263698.263736acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessplashConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

UML (panel): the language of blueprints for software?

Published:09 October 1997Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Unified Method was launched by Grady Booch and Jim Rumbaugh at an OOPSLA'95 Conference Fringe meeting organised by Rational Software Corporation. In 1996 the Unified Method was re-scoped to a notation, and renamed the Unified Modeling Language (UML).Earlier this year, UML was submitted to the Object Management Group for standardisation and has been endorsed by Microsoft, IBM, HP, Platinum Technologies, ObjectTime and many other corporations. No wonder UML is the leading contender as the de facto standard notation for object-oriented analysis and design.The panel will take a sanity check, and will go beyond the hype and newsgroup flames and attempt to form an objective view of UML and its prospects.The members of the panel have been working closely with UhL in many different roles, including that of UML language designer, end-user, consultant, CASE tool expert, and object-oriented methodologist. The discussion will focus on how LJML matches up in practice against one of its original. raisons d'etre as "the language of blueprints for software".Specific issues to be addressed include:• What is the advantage of UML over existing OOA/D notations?• Can UML be used on real projects today?• Is the language sufficiently simple, and well-enough defined, to become the de facto standard?• Will UML lead to improved OOA/D methods and CASE tools?• What is the importance of the meta-model in UML?

References

  1. 1.Booeh, G. (1994). Object-Oriented Analysis and Design. Redwood City, California: The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.Jaeobson, I., M. Christerson, P. Jonsson, and G. Overgard (1995). Object-Oriented Software Engineering: A Use Case Driven Approach. Menlo Park, California: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.Rumbaugh, J. (1996). OMT Insights. New York, New York: SIGS Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.Rumbaugh, J., M. Blaha, W. Premerlani, F. Eddy, and W. Lorenson (1991). Object-Oriented Modeling and Design. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.van Harmelen, M., J. Artim, K. Buffer, A. Henderson, D. Roberts, M. B. Rosson, J. Tarby, and S. Wilson (1997). Object Models in User Interface Design: CHI'97 Workshop Summary. in preparation for SIGCHI Bulletin, October 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. UML (panel): the language of blueprints for software?

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        OOPSLA '97: Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming, systems, languages, and applications
        October 1997
        345 pages
        ISBN:0897919084
        DOI:10.1145/263698

        Copyright © 1997 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 9 October 1997

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate268of1,244submissions,22%

        Upcoming Conference

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader