skip to main content
10.1145/2591971.2592004acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmetricsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Pricing data center demand response

Authors Info & Claims
Published:16 June 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Demand response is crucial for the incorporation of renewable energy into the grid. In this paper, we focus on a particularly promising industry for demand response: data centers. We use simulations to show that, not only are data centers large loads, but they can provide as much (or possibly more) flexibility as large-scale storage if given the proper incentives. However, due to the market power most data centers maintain, it is difficult to design programs that are efficient for data center demand response. To that end, we propose that prediction-based pricing is an appealing market design, and show that it outperforms more traditional supply function bidding mechanisms in situations where market power is an issue. However, prediction-based pricing may be inefficient when predictions are inaccurate, and so we provide analytic, worst-case bounds on the impact of prediction error on the efficiency of prediction-based pricing. These bounds hold even when network constraints are considered, and highlight that prediction-based pricing is surprisingly robust to prediction error.

References

  1. Report to congress on server and data center energy efficiency. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. D. J. Aigner and J. G. Hirschberg. Commercial/industrial customer response to time-of-use electricity prices: Some experimental results. The RAND Journal of Economics, 16(3):341--355, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. B. Aksanli, J. Venkatesh, L. Zhang, and T. Rosing. Utilizing green energy prediction to schedule mixed batch and service jobs in data centers. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 45(3):53--57, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. B. Allaz and J.-L. Vila. Cournot competition, forward markets and efficiency. Journal of Economic theory, 59(1):1--16, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. M. Baran and F. F. Wu. Optimal sizing of capacitors placed on a radial distribution system. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 4(1):735--743, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. O. Besbes and A. Zeevi. Dynamic pricing without knowing the demand function: Risk bounds and near-optimal algorithms. Operations Research, 57(6):1407--1420, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. O. Besbes and A. Zeevi. On the minimax complexity of pricing in a changing environment. Operations research, 59(1):66--79, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. D. W. Cai and A. Wierman. Inefficiency in forward markets with supply friction. In Proc. of CDC, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. L. Chen, N. Li, S. H. Low, and J. C. Doyle. Two market models for demand response in power networks. In IEEE SmartGridComm, pages 397--402, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Y. Chen, D. Gmach, C. Hyser, Z. Wang, C. Bash, C. Hoover, and S. Singhal. Integrated management of application performance, power and cooling in data centers. In Proc. of NOMS, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. H.-D. Chiang and M. E. Baran. On the existence and uniqueness of load flow solution for radial distribution power networks. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, 37(3):410--416, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. A. J. Conejo, J. M. Morales, and L. Baringo. Real-time demand response model. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 1(3):236--242, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Department of Energy. The smart grid: An introduction.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. M. Farivar, C. R. Clarke, S. H. Low, and K. M. Chandy. Inverter var control for distribution systems with renewables. In IEEE SmartGridComm, pages 457--462, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. M. Farivar, R. Neal, C. Clarke, and S. Low. Optimal inverter var control in distribution systems with high pv penetration. In IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, pages 1--7, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. L. Gan, U. Topcu, and S. H. Low. Optimal decentralized protocol for electric vehicle charging. In IEEE CDC, pages 5798--5804, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. L. Gan, A. Wierman, U. Topcu, N. Chen, and S. H. Low. Real-time deferrable load control: handling the uncertainties of renewable generation. In Proc. of ACM eEnergy, pages 113--124, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. A. Gandhi, Y. Chen, D. Gmach, M. Arlitt, and M. Marwah. Minimizing data center SLA violations and power consumption via hybrid resource provisioning. In Proc. of IGCC, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. N. Gast, J.-Y. Le Boudec, A. Proutière, and D.-C. Tomozei. Impact of storage on the efficiency and prices in real-time electricity markets. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Future energy systems, pages 15--26. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. G. Ghatikar, V. Ganti, N. Matson, and M. Piette. Demand response opportunities and enabling technologies for data centers: Findings from field studies. 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. J. Heo, P. Jayachandran, I. Shin, D. Wang, T. Abdelzaher, and X. Liu. Optituner: On performance composition and server farm energy minimization application. Parallel and Distributed Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 22(11):1871--1878, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Y.-Y. Hsu and C.-C. Su. Dispatch of direct load control using dynamic programming. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 6(3):1056--1061, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. https://www.sce.com/wps/portal/home/regulatory/load-profiles.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. http://www.apple.com/environment/renewable-energy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. http://www.google.com/green/energy/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. http://www.nrel.gov/midc/lmu/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. L. Huang, J. Walrand, and K. Ramchandran. Optimal demand response with energy storage management. In IEEE SmartGridComm, pages 61--66, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. D. Irwin, N. Sharma, and P. Shenoy. Towards continuous policy-driven demand response in data centers. Computer Communication Review, 41(4), 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. R. Johari and J. N. Tsitsiklis. Parameterized supply function bidding: Equilibrium and efficiency. Operations research, 59(5):1079--1089, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. J. Koomey. Growth in data center electricity use 2005 to 2010. Oakland, CA: Analytics Press. August, 1:2010, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. J.-Y. Le Boudec and D.-C. Tomozei. A demand-response calculus with perfect batteries. In Measurement, Modelling, and Evaluation of Computing Systems and Dependability and Fault Tolerance, pages 273--287. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. N. Li, L. Chen, and S. H. Low. Optimal demand response based on utility maximization in power networks. In IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, pages 1--8, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. M. Lin, Z. Liu, A. Wierman, and L. Andrew. Online algorithms for geographical load balancing. In Proc. of IGCC, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. M. Lin, A. Wierman, L. L. H. Andrew, and E. Thereska. Dynamic right-sizing for power-proportional data centers. In Proc. of INFOCOM, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Z. Liu, Y. Chen, C. Bash, A. Wierman, D. Gmach, Z. Wang, M. Marwah, and C. Hyser. Renewable and cooling aware workload management for sustainable data centers. In Proc. of ACM Sigmetrics, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. P. Loiseau, G. Schwartz, J. Musacchio, S. Amin, and S. S. Sastry. Incentive mechanisms for internet congestion management: Fixed-budget rebate versus time-of-day pricing. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Z. Ma, D. Callaway, and I. Hiskens. Decentralized charging control for large populations of plug-in electric vehicles. In IEEE CDC, pages 206--212, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. A. H. Mahmud and S. Ren. Online capacity provisioning for carbon-neutral data center with demand-responsive electricity prices. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, 41(2):26--37, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. D. Meisner, C. Sadler, L. Barroso, W. Weber, and T. Wenisch. Power management of online data-intensive services. In Proc. of ISCA, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. A.-H. Mohsenian-Rad and A. Leon-Garcia. Optimal residential load control with price prediction in real-time electricity pricing environments. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 1(2):120--133, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. F. Murphy and Y. Smeers. On the impact of forward markets on investments in oligopolistic markets with reference to electricity. Operations research, 58(3):515--528, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. National Institute of Standards and Technology. NIST framework and roadmap for smart grid interoperability standards. NIST Special Publication 1108, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. NY Times. Power, Pollution and the Internet.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. N. S. Rau. Optimization principles: practical applications to the operation and markets of the electric power industry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. B. Urgaonkar, G. Kesidis, U. V. Shanbhag, and C. Wang. Pricing of service in clouds: Optimal response and strategic interactions. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. R. Urgaonkar, B. Urgaonkar, M. Neely, and A. Sivasubramaniam. Optimal power cost management using stored energy in data centers. In Proc. of the ACM Sigmetrics, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. P. Van de Ven, N. Hegde, L. Massoulie, and T. Salonidis. Optimal control of residential energy storage under price fluctuations. In Proc. of ENERGY, pages 159--162, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/rates/electric/coincident-peak.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. H. Xu and B. Li. Cost efficient datacenter selection for cloud services. In Proc. of ICCC, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Y. Xu, N. Li, and S. Low. Demand response with parameterized supply function bidding.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. J. Yao, S. S. Oren, and I. Adler. Two-settlement electricity markets with price caps and cournot generation firms. European Journal of Operational Research, 181(3):1279--1296, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Y. Yao, L. Huang, A. Sharma, L. Golubchik, and M. Neely. Data centers power reduction: A two time scale approach for delay tolerant workloads. In Proc. of INFOCOM, pages 1431--1439, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Q. Zhang, M. Zhani, Q. Zhu, S. Zhang, R. Boutaba, and J. Hellerstein. Dynamic energy-aware capacity provisioning for cloud computing environments. In ICAC, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. R. D. Zimmerman, C. E. Murillo-Sánchez, and D. Gan. A matlab power system simulation package, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Pricing data center demand response

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGMETRICS '14: The 2014 ACM international conference on Measurement and modeling of computer systems
      June 2014
      614 pages
      ISBN:9781450327893
      DOI:10.1145/2591971

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 June 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGMETRICS '14 Paper Acceptance Rate40of237submissions,17%Overall Acceptance Rate459of2,691submissions,17%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader