skip to main content
10.1145/2639189.2670266acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnordichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

User interaction metadata for healthcare information systems

Published:26 October 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Semantically consistent understanding of data/content in information systems is a key issue in collaborative work settings. Even simple data -- such as timestamps -- can be a source of misunderstandings both in data entry and reporting tasks. Healthcare information systems generate timestamps during data entry situations. Timestamped data are used for various purposes, such as efficiency calculations, organizational development, and research. However, timestamps are often generated ambiguously in different ways: they are a source of semantic interpretation errors. In this paper we illustrate the phenomena of timestamp ambiguity in medical settings. We suggest that User Interaction Metadata (UIM) could reduce the problems caused by ambiguous and erroneous timestamps. UIM may reveal hidden heterogeneity in data interpretation. Additionally, it can be used to identify user behavior patterns that are currently unrecognizable from raw transaction data.

References

  1. Laine, S., Nieminen, M. and Helenius, M. User Interaction Metadata for Improved Information Traceability. Proc. ICIQ, MIT Information Quality Program (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Lopetegui, M., Yen, P., Lai, A., Jeffries, J., Embi, P. and Payne, P. Time motion studies in healthcare: What are we talking about? J. Biomed. Inform., 49, 0 (2014), 292--299. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Niazkhani, Z., Pirnejad, H., Sijs, H. v. d. and Aarts, J. Evaluating the medication process in the context of CPOE use: The significance of working around the system. Int. J. Med. Inf., 80, 7 (2011), 490--506.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Stoop, A. P., Vrangbæk, K. and Berg, M. Theory and practice of waiting time data as a performance indicator in health care: A case study from The Netherlands. Health Policy, 73, 1 (2005), 41--51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Taylor, F. W. The principles of scientific management. Harper & Brothers, New York, USA, 1911.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Yang, Z., Ng, B., Kankanhalli, A. and Yip, J. W. L. Workarounds in the use of IS in healthcare: A case study of an electronic medication administration system. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70, 1 (2012), 43--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. User interaction metadata for healthcare information systems

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      NordiCHI '14: Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational
      October 2014
      361 pages
      ISBN:9781450325424
      DOI:10.1145/2639189

      Copyright © 2014 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 October 2014

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      NordiCHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate89of361submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate379of1,572submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader