skip to main content
10.1145/2643188.2643190acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessccgConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Multiple instances object detection

Published:28 May 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Since the beginning of the new century the growing popularity of markerless augmented reality (AR) applications inspired the research in the area of object instance detection, registration and tracking. The usage of common daily objects or specially developed fliers or magazines (e.g. IKEA) as AR markers became more popular than traditional ARtoolkit-like black/white patterns. Although there are many different methods for object instance detection emerging every year, very little attention is paid to the case where multiple instances of the same object are present in the scene and need to be augmented (e.g. a table full of fliers, several exemplars of historical coins in the museum, etc.). In this paper we review existing methods of multiple instance detection and propose a new method for grayscale images overcoming the limitations of previous methods.

References

  1. Ballard, D. H. 1981. Generalizing the Hough transform to detect arbitrary shapes. Pattern recognition 13, 2, 111--122.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bay, H., Tuytelaars, T., and Van Gool, L. 2008. Speeded-up robust features (SURF). Computer Vision and Image Understanding 110, 3, 346--359. Similarity Matching in Computer Vision and Multimedia. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Calonder, M., Lepetit, V., Strecha, C., and Fua, P. 2010. BRIEF: binary robust independent elementary features. In Proceedings of the 11th European conference on Computer vision: Part IV, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, ECCV'10, 778--792. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Collet, A., Berenson, D., Srinivasa, S., and Ferguson, D. 2009. Object recognition and full pose registration from a single image for robotic manipulation. In Robotics and Automation, 2009. ICRA '09. IEEE International Conference on, 48--55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Fischler, M. A., and Bolles, R. C. 1981. Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Communications of the ACM 24, 6, 381--395. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Haladová, Z., and Šikudová, E. 2013. Combination of global and local features for efficient classification of paitings. In Spring Conference on Computer Graphics SCCG 2013, 21--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Ke, Y., and Sukthankar, R. 2004. PCA-SIFT: A more distinctive representation for local image descriptors. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on, vol. 2, IEEE, II--506. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Lowe, D. 2004. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision 60, 2, 91--110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Mikolajczyk, K., Leibe, B., and Schiele, B. 2006. Multiple object class detection with a generative model. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on, vol. 1, IEEE, 26--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Piccinini, P., Prati, A., and Cucchiara, R. 2009. A fast multi-model approach for object duplicate extraction. In Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2009 Workshop on, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Piccinini, P., Prati, A., and Cucchiara, R. 2010. SIFT-based segmentation of multiple instances of low-textured objects. In Proceedings of international conference on machine vision (ICMV), Hong Kong, 28--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Piccinini, P., Prati, A., and Cucchiara, R. 2012. Real-time object detection and localization with SIFT-based clustering. Image and Vision Computing 30, 8, 573--587. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Rosten, E., and Drummond, T. 2006. Machine learning for high-speed corner detection. In Computer Vision ECCV 2006, A. Leonardis, H. Bischof, and A. Pinz, Eds., vol. 3951 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 430--443. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Rublee, E., Rabaud, V., Konolige, K., and Bradski, G. 2011. ORB: An efficient alternative to sift or surf. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2564--2571. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Zickler, S., and Veloso, M. 2006. Detection and localization of multiple objects. In Humanoid Robots, 2006 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on, 20--25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Multiple instances object detection

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        SCCG '14: Proceedings of the 30th Spring Conference on Computer Graphics
        May 2014
        105 pages
        ISBN:9781450330701
        DOI:10.1145/2643188

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 28 May 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate42of81submissions,52%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader