skip to main content
10.1145/2652574.2653408acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesergoihmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

De la gestion du risque fatigue à la prise de décision collaborative: l'exemple du drone Harfang

Published:16 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Harfang UAV is a high value asset in french intelligence arena. Since the initial operational capability (IOC), it has been deployed and involved in NATO operations. Its long endurance capability can lead operators to drowsiness and misunderstanding among crewmembers. Oftenly involved in high value point of interest surveillance but sometimes in « looking at stones » missions all night long without any clue about what is gonna pop up » Harfang crewmembers are facing a big challenge. In this paper, we present some recommandations about how to manage fatigue risk in UAV military operations and how to improve communications for an enhanced sensemaking among crew members.

References

  1. Damasio, A. R. (1996). The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol.Sci., 351: 1413--1420.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Thomas, M. (2003). Neural basis of alertness and cognitive performance impairments during sleepiness II. Effects of 48 and 72 h of sleep deprivation on waking human regional brain activity. Thalamus Relat. Syst. 2: 199--229.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D. and Damasio, A. R. (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275: 1293--1295.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Killgore, William D. S. (2006). Impaired decision making following 49 h of sleep deprivation. J. Sleep. Res., 15: 7 6 13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Folkard, S., & Akerstedt, T. (2004). Trends in the risk of accidents and injuries and their implications for models of fatigue and performance. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine; 75(3, Suppl.):A161--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Åkerstedt, T., Folkard, S., Portin, C. (2004). Predictions from the three-process model of alertness. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 75 (3), section II, A75--A83.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Wolff, M. (2003). Apports de l'analyse géométrique des données pour l'analyse de l'activité. In Formalismes de modélisation pour l'analyse du travail et l'ergonomie, J.-C. Sperandio & M. Wolff Eds. PUF, Paris, 195--227.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Artman, H., Garbis, C. (1998). Situation Awarness as Distributed Cognition. Department of Communication studies Linköping University Sweden. ECCE'98, Limerick.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Boyd, J.R. (1996). The essence of winning and losing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousands Oaks, CA: SageGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors 37(1), 32--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Karsenty, L. (2008). L'incompréhension dans la communication, Le Travail Humain. Paris: PUF.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Berthoz, A. (2009). La simplexité, Odile Jacob.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. De la gestion du risque fatigue à la prise de décision collaborative: l'exemple du drone Harfang

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      Ergo'IHM '12: Proceedings of the 2012 Conference on Ergonomie et Interaction homme-machine
      October 2012
      261 pages
      ISBN:9781450318464
      DOI:10.1145/2652574

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 October 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader