skip to main content
research-article

Performance within a fiber-to-the-home network

Published: 28 July 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Fiber-To-The-Home (FTTH) networks are on the brink of bringing significantly higher capacity to residential users compared to today's commercial residential options. There are several burgeoning FTTH networks that provide capacities of up to 1 Gbps. We have been monitoring one such operational network---the Case Connection Zone---for 23 months. In this paper we seek to understand the extent to which the users in this network are in fact making use of the provided bi-directional 1 Gbps capacity. We find that even when given virtually unlimited capacity the majority of the time users do not retrieve information from the Internet in excess of commercially available data rates and transmit at only modestly higher rates than commodity networks support. Further, we find that end host issues---most prominently buffering at both end points---are often the cause of the lower-than-expected performance.

References

[1]
Bringing ultra high-speed broadband to Stanford homes. http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/10/bringing-ultra-high-speed-broadband-to.html.
[2]
Case Connection Zone. http://caseconnectionzone.org/.
[3]
Chattanooga, Tenn Announces only 1 Gigabit Broadband Service in U.S. for Both Residential and Business Customer. http://chattanoogagig.com/pdf/Chattanooga_GPON_EPB.pdf, 2010.
[4]
M. Allman. Comments on Bufferbloat. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 43(1), Jan. 2013.
[5]
M. Allman. On Changing the Culture of Empirical Internet Assessment. ACM Computer Communication Review, 43(3), July 2013. Editorial Contribution.
[6]
M. Allman, V. Paxson, and E. Blanton. TCP Congestion Control, Sept. 2009. RFC 5681.
[7]
H. Balakrishnan, V. N. Padmanabhan, G. Fairhurst, and M. Sooriyabandara. TCP Performance Implications of Network Path Asymmetry, Dec. 2002. RFC 3449.
[8]
H. Balakrishnan, S. Seshan, E. Amir, and R. Katz. Improving TCP/IP performance over wireless networks. MobiCom, 95:2--11, Nov. 1995.
[9]
Z. S. Bischof, J. S. Otto, and F. E. Bustamante. Up, Down and Around the Stack: ISP Characterization from Network Intensive Applications. In ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Measurements Up the STack (W-MUST), Aug. 2012.
[10]
Z. S. Bischof, J. S. Otto, M. A. Sánchez, J. P. Rula, D. R. Choffnes, and F. E. Bustamante. Crowdsourcing ISP Characterization to the Network Edge. In ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Measurements Up the STack (W-MUST), Aug. 2011.
[11]
E. Blanton and M. Allman. On Making TCP More Robust to Packet Reordering. ACM Computer Communication Review, 32(1):20--30, Jan. 2002.
[12]
S. Dawkins, G. Montenegro, M. Kojo, and V. Magret. End-to-end Performance Implications of Slow Links, July 2001. RFC 3150.
[13]
S. Dawkins, G. Montenegro, M. Kojo, V. Magret, and N. Vaidya. End-to-end Performance Implications of Links with Errors, Aug. 2001. RFC 3155.
[14]
M. Dischinger, M. Marcon, S. Guha, K. Gummadi, R. Mahajan, and S. Saroiu. Glasnost: Enabling end users to detect traffic differentiation. In Proceedings of the 7th USENIX conference on Networked systems design and implementation, Apr. 2010.
[15]
K. Fall and S. Floyd. Simulation-based Comparisons of Tahoe, Reno, and SACK TCP. Computer Communications Review, 26(3), July 1996.
[16]
S. Floyd. HighSpeed TCP for Large Congestion Windows, Dec. 2003. RFC 3649.
[17]
L. Gonick. Personal Communication, Apr. 2021.
[18]
Ultra high-speed broadband is coming to Kansas City, Kansas. http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/03/ultra-high-speed-broadband-is-coming-to.html.
[19]
S. Ha, I. Rhee, and L. Xu. CUBIC: A New TCP-Friendly High-Speed TCP Variant. ACM SIGOPS Operating System Review, 42(5), July 2008.
[20]
M. Handley, S. Floyd, J. Padhye, and J. Widmer. TCP Friendly Rate Control (TFRC): Protocol Specification, Jan. 2003. RFC 3448.
[21]
V. Jacobson. Congestion Avoidance and Control. In ACM SIGCOMM, 1988.
[22]
C. Jin, D. Wei, S. Low, J. Bunn, H. Choe, J. Doyle, H. Newman, S. Ravot, S. Singh, F. Paganini, G. Buhmaster, L. Cottrell, O. Martin, and W. chun Feng. FAST TCP: From Theory to Experiments. IEEE Network, 19(1), 2005.
[23]
C. Kreibich, N. Weaver, B. Nechaev, and V. Paxson. Netalyzr: illuminating the edge network. In ACM Internet Measurement Conference, Nov. 2010.
[24]
M. Mathis, J. Semke, J. Mahdavi, and T. Ott. The Macroscopic Behavior of the TCP Congestion Avoidance Algorithm. Computer Communication Review, 27(3), July 1997.
[25]
J. Padhye, V. Firoiu, D. Towsley, and J. Kurose. Modeling TCP Throughput: A Simple Model and its Empirical Validation. In ACM SIGCOMM, Sept. 1998.
[26]
V. Paxson. Automated Packet Trace Analysis of TCP Implementations. In ACM SIGCOMM, Sept. 1997.
[27]
V. Paxson. Bro: A System for Detecting Network Intruders in Real-Time. Computer Networks, Dec. 1999.
[28]
M. Sargent, E. Blanton, and M. Allman. Modern Application Layer Transmission Patterns from a Transport Perspective. In Passive and Active Measurement Conference, Mar. 2014.
[29]
M. Sargent, B. Stack, T. Dooner, and M. Allman. A First Look at 1 Gbps Fiber-To-The-Home Traffic. Technical Report 12-009, International Computer Science Institute, Aug. 2012.
[30]
Semke, J. and Mahdavi, J. and Mathis, M. Automatic TCP buffer tuning. In ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, volume 28, pages 315--323. ACM, 1998.
[31]
S. Sundaresan, W. de Donato, N. Feamster, R. Teixeira, S. Crawford, and A. Pescapè. Broadband Internet Performance: A View From The Gateway. SIGCOMM-Computer Communication Review, 41(4):134, 2011.
[32]
The Spamhaus Project - PBL. http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/.
[33]
M. Zhang, B. Karp, S. Floyd, and L. Peterson. RR-TCP: A Reordering-Robust TCP with DSACK. In Proceedings of the Eleventh IEEE International Conference on Networking Protocols (ICNP), Nov. 2003.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)When satellite is all you haveProceedings of the 22nd ACM Internet Measurement Conference10.1145/3517745.3561432(137-150)Online publication date: 25-Oct-2022
  • (2022)TCP Capacity Utilization In Next Generation Passive Optical Network During Degradation Attack2022 IEEE 6th International Symposium on Telecommunication Technologies (ISTT)10.1109/ISTT56288.2022.9966544(44-49)Online publication date: 14-Nov-2022
  • (2020)Putting DNS in ContextProceedings of the ACM Internet Measurement Conference10.1145/3419394.3423659(309-316)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Performance within a fiber-to-the-home network

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
      ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review  Volume 44, Issue 3
      July 2014
      127 pages
      ISSN:0146-4833
      DOI:10.1145/2656877
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 28 July 2014
      Published in SIGCOMM-CCR Volume 44, Issue 3

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. fiber-to-the-home
      2. measurement
      3. tcp

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2022)When satellite is all you haveProceedings of the 22nd ACM Internet Measurement Conference10.1145/3517745.3561432(137-150)Online publication date: 25-Oct-2022
      • (2022)TCP Capacity Utilization In Next Generation Passive Optical Network During Degradation Attack2022 IEEE 6th International Symposium on Telecommunication Technologies (ISTT)10.1109/ISTT56288.2022.9966544(44-49)Online publication date: 14-Nov-2022
      • (2020)Putting DNS in ContextProceedings of the ACM Internet Measurement Conference10.1145/3419394.3423659(309-316)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2020
      • (2019)Rethinking Home Networks in the Ultrabroadband Era2019 IEEE 39th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS)10.1109/ICDCS.2019.00185(1868-1877)Online publication date: Jul-2019
      • (2019)Phase-Modulated Hybrid High-Speed Internet /WiFi/Pre-5G In-Building Networks over SMF and PCF with GI-POF/IVLLC TransportIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2926709(1-1)Online publication date: 2019
      • (2018)Improving Communication through Overlay Detours: Pipe Dream or Actionable Insight?2018 IEEE 38th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS)10.1109/ICDCS.2018.00143(1422-1431)Online publication date: Jul-2018
      • (2016)Bandwidth efficiency in the next generation access architecture XG-PON2016 Eighth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN)10.1109/ICUFN.2016.7537154(833-838)Online publication date: Jul-2016
      • (2015)Resilience of Deployed TCP to Blind AttacksProceedings of the 2015 Internet Measurement Conference10.1145/2815675.2815700(13-26)Online publication date: 28-Oct-2015

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media